2.0 6466 evo 9
Nov 8, 2017, 07:41 AM
#16
Account Disabled
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: bahrain, originally from cali
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Hp is kinda worthless your going to be worried about the TQ. Typically what causes **** in the t-case to go bad. Also don't launch or beat on it and your good. I made over 900 on stock t-case with a super 99 almost 3 years ago and friend just made 1077 on his super 99. Shortly after I sent my case to shep as did my friend. Both running 2.3's for the record as well.
Granted I would not go over 400-450 tq because at that point its only a matter of time
Granted I would not go over 400-450 tq because at that point its only a matter of time
Nov 10, 2017, 07:21 AM
#18
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Nov 18, 2017, 06:08 AM
#20
Originally Posted by Teal2nnr
Would you recommend the 2.4? Once my built 2.0 dies, Im considering a rev monster 2.1 or a ER 2.2. I was concerned about the head gasket sealing issues with the 2.4. Just curious on your thoughts.
All the motor configurations you have mentioned have proven to make power time and time again. Decide what you ultimately want to do with the car as a starting point. If you are set on a particular block displacement, I’m sure many people will chime in on pro’s and con’s, including myself.
Nov 20, 2017, 12:47 PM
#22
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
If you want to give up some torque and rev higher, an ER 2.2SLR is theee engine to have. Will rev to 9500 no issue, so no need for taller final drive.
Nov 20, 2017, 07:18 PM
#23
If you want a gnarly torque monster street car, the 2.4 is where it's at. However, it's limited to 8k rpm due to the stroke. So you need to put a 4.11 final drive in the trans so it can do 140 in 4th, and calm the torque down some.
If you want to give up some torque and rev higher, an ER 2.2SLR is theee engine to have. Will rev to 9500 no issue, so no need for taller final drive.
If you want to give up some torque and rev higher, an ER 2.2SLR is theee engine to have. Will rev to 9500 no issue, so no need for taller final drive.
Jan 20, 2018, 12:51 AM
#26
Evolving Member
I choose .84 to keep it streetable. Rather sacrifice a bit on top and get a better punch, it's a four Cylinder bro. I asked a different question regarding the rated hp of that turbo with that rear housing. Has anyone tried the 6466 with a .84 rear and what was the result ?
TS .84 AR you are choking your build might as well go for a smaller turbo 6062 or 6266
Jan 20, 2018, 12:54 AM
#27
Evolving Member
Hp is kinda worthless your going to be worried about the TQ. Typically what causes **** in the t-case to go bad. Also don't launch or beat on it and your good. I made over 900 on stock t-case with a super 99 almost 3 years ago and friend just made 1077 on his super 99. Shortly after I sent my case to shep as did my friend. Both running 2.3's for the record as well.
Granted I would not go over 400-450 tq because at that point its only a matter of time
Granted I would not go over 400-450 tq because at that point its only a matter of time
I would keep a 2.3 under 800 whp and ideally I would only use that build for 700 to 750 max. Also I wouldnt worry about whp.
4g64 build with LR for high hp build stroker are better engines.
Jan 20, 2018, 08:46 AM
#28
Evolving Member
Running a 2.3/6466 and haven't had any issues.
2.4 are prone to HG failure when you start giving it lots of boost.
Although I am definitely going 2.2 153mm on my next build.
Feb 20, 2018, 08:16 PM
#30
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Dover DE
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts