Stock Block Borg Warner S363sxe on C16 - mustang dyno results *video* - EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Go Back  EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community > Lancer Evolution 1-9 Forums > Evo Dyno Tuning and Results
Reload this Page >

Stock Block Borg Warner S363sxe on C16 - mustang dyno results *video*

Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning and Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stock Block Borg Warner S363sxe on C16 - mustang dyno results *video*

Reply

 
 
 
Old Oct 31, 2017, 08:08 AM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stock Block Borg Warner S363sxe on C16 - mustang dyno results *video*

Got my Evo strapped down to a Mustang dyno last Friday night, and gave it a tune on some VP C16. On 93 octane the car made around 530whp consistently on virtual dyno Dyno jet estimates.

On c16 the car put down 516whp on the Mustang dyno at 35 pounds of boost. The shop owner said on a dynojet it should make 598whp in comparison to his dyno.

Video link---->

We could have gotten a bit more aggressive and made more power, but I didn't want to risk it being that I was going to the track with the car the next morning.

mods are:
Untouched 102k mile block other than balance shafts removed
hks 280 cams
borg warner s363sxe
Forward facing manifold
spoolinup non cdi cop
fic 1100s
255 walbro
Vrsf intercooler
custom piping
3" aluminum exhaust
Etc
EvilDSM97 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 3, 2017, 03:33 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Evo_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Posts: 3,384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
The different between mustang and dynojet is approx 10%. Not 15%+
Evo_Jay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2017, 09:32 AM
  #3  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evo_Jay View Post
The different between mustang and dynojet is approx 10%. Not 15%+
I'm no expert on the matter, I don't own a dyno, but from what I am told it is dependent on how the dyno is loaded and can be anywhere between 10-15% difference. He said his tends to be more towards a 15% diference.

Last edited by EvilDSM97; Nov 8, 2017 at 11:03 AM.
EvilDSM97 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2017, 10:20 AM
  #4  
Evolving Member
 
Eric SlowEvo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Tx
Posts: 326
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Let her rip, u can make more lol
Eric SlowEvo8 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 9, 2017, 10:20 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
 
mines5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Streets of willow
Posts: 741
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Good Numbers buddy.

Did your fuel pump maxed out ?
mines5 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2017, 01:46 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
letsgetthisdone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 10,451
Thanked 509 Times in 485 Posts
If you have to run race fuel, why not get C85?
letsgetthisdone is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2017, 02:56 PM
  #7  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
razorlab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alameda, ca
Posts: 10,969
Thanked 218 Times in 192 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone View Post
If you have to run race fuel, why not get C85?
I'd imagine the 1100cc injectors have a lot to do with it.
razorlab is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 10, 2017, 05:46 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 542
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
In all my observations Mustang reads exactly 15% less then dynojet.
That is properly default calibrated heartbreaking Mustang.

I am happy to have two near me, that have consistently read exactly so, 15% less.
However cannot speak with certainty about the Mustang in question: owners advice sounds sound to me based on my Mustang experiences.
alpinaturbo is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 12, 2017, 11:17 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Evo_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Posts: 3,384
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by alpinaturbo View Post
In all my observations Mustang reads exactly 15% less then dynojet.
That is properly default calibrated heartbreaking Mustang.

I am happy to have two near me, that have consistently read exactly so, 15% less.
However cannot speak with certainty about the Mustang in question: owners advice sounds sound to me based on my Mustang experiences.
AMS, the only shop that has both dyno under the same roof, has said repeatedly, that the difference is 8-10%.

Also, every time I've see a car dyno on a mustang then dyno on a dynojet, it usually about 10% difference.
Evo_Jay is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2017, 08:47 AM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
letsgetthisdone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 10,451
Thanked 509 Times in 485 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab View Post
I'd imagine the 1100cc injectors have a lot to do with it.
Injectors are easily changed..
letsgetthisdone is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2017, 09:16 AM
  #11  
Evolving Member
 
evostanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Socal
Posts: 256
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Its 15% difference with my tuner
evostanman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 13, 2017, 07:04 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Like some stated above my injectors are the reasoning behind sticking with c16 over ethanol or even something like q16.
I'm right around 80% idc's with the fuel setup currently. The modded walbro 255 seems to be working well, I'm actually very surprised it has gotten me to this power level on a mustang dyno in all honesty.
As far as the particular dyno in question stock GTR's make in the 420-430whp range on it according to the shop owner?

For what its worth, Two seasons ago when my car was on the stock VIII turbo on e85 it made 345whp on this same dyno.
Last year with an old school Precision 6262 on pump gas it made 458whp on this dyno.
Ive gained another 58whp over that with the 63mm BW on race fuel with no other changes other than the Spoolinup cop.

Last edited by EvilDSM97; Nov 13, 2017 at 07:23 PM.
EvilDSM97 is offline  
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
spitefire1
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
10
Nov 30, 2017 04:18 PM
2winscroll
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
8
Nov 16, 2017 07:53 PM
EvilDSM97
Evo Dyno Tuning and Results
3
Oct 6, 2017 09:17 PM
EvilDSM97
Evo Dyno Tuning and Results
9
Jul 9, 2017 06:45 AM
Mortose
Evo X Dyno Results
3
Aug 8, 2016 05:37 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Stock Block Borg Warner S363sxe on C16 - mustang dyno results *video*


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.