Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2.4LR Evo 9 93oct Virtual Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2018, 02:33 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
ConEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: EvoNation
Posts: 135
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
2.4LR Evo 9 93oct Virtual Dyno Results

Hello everyone, this is my first post in the forum and also my first thread. I would like some advice and thoughts about my current build. The build is as follows:

Engine
2.4LR Block
Carrilo 156mm H-Beam Rods
Wiseco 1400HD 86.5mm Pistons
Manley 100mm Billet Crankshaft
GSC Race Balance Shaft
Fluidampr Crank Pulley
ΟΕΜ intake manifold
ΟΕΜ throttle body
ΟΕΜ manifold
Evo 8 turbo with 20G compressor & 10.5 Hotside
Forge Evo 9 IWG with 18psi spring
Tomei V2 Downpipe
De-cat Test Pipe
HKS Hi-Power Silent Exhaust
Greddy intercooler
Mishimoto Intercooler Pipe Kit
ARP 2000 Head Studs
ARP Main Studs
ARP Balancer Bolt

Head
Mild Intake & Exhaust Porting
GSC R2 Cams
GSC spring & Retainer Kit
GSC Zero Tick Lifters
Supertech STD size valves
HKS Cam Pulley
ER Mivec Gear Mod
ARP Cam Tower Bolts
ARP Cam Bolts

Transmission
5speed trans from Evo 6 - Rebuild with Synchrotech carbon synchros
ORC Twin Clutch
4.11 Final Drive

ECU
Link G4+

Fuel
AEM 320 Fuel Pump
AMS Fuel Rail
ID 1050x injectors
93oct

Handling
Tein Flex Z
Project mu 2 piece SCR-Pro front rotors and HC+ pads with teflon brake lines

Wheels
OEM for now wearing Continental contact 3. Upgrading to Advan RS 17x8.5 wearing 245/40/17 Michelin Pilot Sport 4.

The run was done in 3rd Gear, 93oct pump gas. The boost was 25psi and uptop dropping to 20psi probably due to backpressure issues. I also attach the csv file of the log.

Next step after the purchase of Magnus V5 and S90 TB, is the purchase of a T4 1.15a/r 6466 TS with a T4 TS Manifold and twin mvs 38mm wastegates. After these, I will try to hit my goal which is around 600+whp or even 650+ on pump gas. Before you ask me why I use pump gas, E85 is unavailable at my country and race gas is not in my thoughts at the moment as it is a DD. However, here we use 98oct RON pump gas which i think it is a high quality 93pump gas in us

Thank you
Attached Files
File Type: csv
high.csv (10.9 KB, 0 views)

Last edited by ConEvo; Nov 22, 2018 at 02:51 AM. Reason: correction
Old Feb 26, 2018, 05:36 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
hutch959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,459
Received 109 Likes on 99 Posts
i notice you had 4.11 final. you did correct your VD data for it .. correct?
Old Feb 26, 2018, 06:09 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
ExViTermini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Needs more wgate preload. tq is delayed badly.
The following users liked this post:
Wicked_X (Sep 19, 2019)
Old Feb 26, 2018, 06:26 PM
  #4  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 813 Likes on 678 Posts
why are you not seeing full boost until almost 5k RPM?
Old Feb 27, 2018, 12:04 AM
  #5  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
ConEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: EvoNation
Posts: 135
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by hutch959
i notice you had 4.11 final. you did correct your VD data for it .. correct?
Yes, i corrected it
Old Feb 27, 2018, 12:05 AM
  #6  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
ConEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: EvoNation
Posts: 135
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ExViTermini
Needs more wgate preload. tq is delayed badly.
That is what i noticed too. The wastegate is a Forge IWG with a 18psi spring
Old Feb 27, 2018, 12:09 AM
  #7  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
ConEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: EvoNation
Posts: 135
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by kaj
why are you not seeing full boost until almost 5k RPM?
I do not know what is wrong with boost. I attached the csv log file. i did not manage to set up virtual dyno to show psi correctly. I maybe doing something wrong with the log recording
Old Feb 27, 2018, 12:12 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
ConEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: EvoNation
Posts: 135
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Keep in mind that the tuning was done on the street and not on dyno. I do not know if on dyno the tuner can set it up to spool earlier
Old Feb 27, 2018, 04:45 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Tuxevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 569
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Something isn't right. A 20g on a 2.4 should see peak boost much, much sooner.
Old Feb 27, 2018, 05:45 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
ConEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: EvoNation
Posts: 135
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Tuxevo
Something isn't right. A 20g on a 2.4 should see peak boost much, much sooner.
I know. I will have a look to my wastegate preload and also on my 10.5 hotside for possible leaks
Old Feb 27, 2018, 02:28 PM
  #11  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 813 Likes on 678 Posts
Originally Posted by ConEvo
Keep in mind that the tuning was done on the street and not on dyno. I do not know if on dyno the tuner can set it up to spool earlier
I'm not too familiar with a 20g, but my FP HTA71 reached 20psi by 3400RPM or so and my FP Green did so around 3600RPM, both on a stock 2.0L. You're not seeing it until 4300RPM. Could be a number of reasons, but I'd do a boost leak test just in case, so you don't kill the turbo.
The following users liked this post:
ConEvo (Feb 27, 2018)
Old Mar 4, 2018, 10:36 AM
  #12  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
ConEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: EvoNation
Posts: 135
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Update.

This weekend I tried to adjust the wastegate preload. the preload was far too stiff. Maybe 6 full turns. I adjusted it to 3 full turns and took it for a road test. It seems that it had slightly better spool but nowhere near from what is supposed to spool. Probably the hotside must have cracks. Here's the new log


Regards
Old Mar 4, 2018, 11:31 AM
  #13  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (3)
 
CurseDSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pinckney, Michigan
Posts: 3,193
Received 184 Likes on 130 Posts
If I may make a suggestion if your going new intake mani, look at something with larger runners to let that 2.4 breath. The magnus is a sweet piece but to small for the 2.4. I would suggest the AMS f1 if you could fine one, or a JMF manifold. The larger ports on the runners will help a ton. Plus it will push the rpm band more to the right some which will help your top end. I am planning on running a JMF drag mani on my car. Good luck with the build.
The following users liked this post:
ConEvo (Mar 4, 2018)
Old Mar 4, 2018, 11:35 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
 
MR ArcticC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 126
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Your spool is bad. My 2.4LR (gsc s3+ magnus V5+fp black mhi housing) hits 300tq sooner than yours. Is your 2.4LR cam timing spot on?
Old Mar 5, 2018, 01:34 AM
  #15  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (3)
 
CurseDSM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Pinckney, Michigan
Posts: 3,193
Received 184 Likes on 130 Posts
Originally Posted by MR ArcticC
Your spool is bad. My 2.4LR (gsc s3+ magnus V5+fp black mhi housing) hits 300tq sooner than yours. Is your 2.4LR cam timing spot on?
Remember he is on a stock intake mani, and tb they are both choke points on a 2.4. My car makes 300 ft lbs of tq by 3500 rpms on stock tb and Rev3 ported intake mani with a turbo similar to a black.


Quick Reply: 2.4LR Evo 9 93oct Virtual Dyno Results



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 PM.