Evo 9 - Big power on 93oct from an ETS Twinscroll 6266 turbokit
We finished Phillips evo for now on 93oct. He has to heavy of springs in the wastegates, so we were unable to control the boost. This is 100% on wastegate pressure only. cool thing is, the gas he uses is really good 93oct, so we were able to still get it done even with 38-40psi boost creeps.
This car made real high #'s on 93. higher than most setups do. *** this is just a temporary result due to not being able to go lower boost *** I just wanted to share with others how well the 6266 worked even on limited octane gas when pushed to the absolute edge. again though, i didn't do this boost curve by choice! the Tial MVS 38mm gates wont allow any lower boost with the 15psi springs! so if you guys are doing dual gates do not get them each with 15psi springs or this will be your boost curve! Fuel: 93octane~ ECU: Stock ecu + speed density Mods: Built 2.0 Manley pistons / Manley H-Beam Rods Kelford 272 Cams BR Double pumper FIC 1450cc Injectors Grimmspeed 3port Greddy Evo2 exhaust BR 65mm throttle body Ported intake manifold ETS Speed density 4" intake ETS 4" Intercooler ETS UICP LICP ETS turbo kit 6266 Ball bearing 1.00 Twin Scroll T4 Dual 38mm TiAL MVS Wastegates (15psi springs each) Tial Q BOV ACT XTSS Clutch With ACT Flywheel http://www.tscomptuned.net/_images/d...illip-6266.jpg ================================================== ==================== heres what it made on a dyno dynamics; (one of two pulls. other one made 595) http://www.tscomptuned.net/_images/d...phillip-dd.jpg Phillip emailed me the following: Welp the Dyno backed up the numbers and everyone was blown away. I won the 4 cylinder FI class! And folks flip that I had a dyno sheet already with those same numbers lol. (THIS DYNO IS CALIBRATED TO READ LIKE A LOCAL DYNOJET NEAR THEM) ================================================== ==================== curious to see what it makes once i can drop the boost around 33psi. def cant be running 40psi on 93 for to much longer. |
very nice work Tom....I bet drivebility is even better{thumbup}
|
Nice work tom
Couple of questions for you friend. What do you think on same setup but with 6466 t4 twinscroll 1.0 a/r? Voices say that spool very similar to 6266 but make way more power with a more brutal powerband. Do you think it will be interesting? |
Very nice power on 93oct.
I hope to get better results from my 6266 once the car is back from the shop and with Toms magic :) |
someone get this man a camera, we need a video!
|
This has me excited. I have a top mount 6266 being finished up right now. I'll be on E85 on a freshly built 2.0lr with S3 cams. Good job Tom on the tune, once again you have worked your magic.
|
that's serious boost on pump gas :) good work ;)
|
Originally Posted by detroit pistins
(Post 10821518)
very nice work Tom....I bet drivebility is even better{thumbup}
Originally Posted by el.guerrero
(Post 10821586)
Nice work tom
Couple of questions for you friend. What do you think on same setup but with 6466 t4 twinscroll 1.0 a/r? Voices say that spool very similar to 6266 but make way more power with a more brutal powerband. Do you think it will be interesting?
Originally Posted by Evo9_Dubai
(Post 10821616)
Very nice power on 93oct.
I hope to get better results from my 6266 once the car is back from the shop and with Toms magic :) The car in this current condition is only gonna see 1 tank of fuel most likely. its just temporary :)
Originally Posted by V8HAHA
(Post 10821696)
This has me excited. I have a top mount 6266 being finished up right now. I'll be on E85 on a freshly built 2.0lr with S3 cams. Good job Tom on the tune, once again you have worked your magic.
This boost will be dropped back to around 34psi or so not sure how much were gonna try and do, but the 38-40psi right now is not going to stay!
Originally Posted by HsamehH
(Post 10822023)
that's serious boost on pump gas :) good work ;)
Originally Posted by 05ah8james
(Post 10821637)
someone get this man a camera, we need a video!
|
must be reliable like that on 93 octane with only on 13 pounds. You just gave me an idea to do mine like that :). btw nice numbers and car.
|
Originally Posted by tscompusa
(Post 10822095)
{thumbup}
I am not sure. i don't think a 6466 could make more on 93 though in this cars current situation / case. however a 6466 on a t4 housing? it would kick ass! If you're interested in anything pm me i sold the guy this kit. I try to sell a lot of ETS parts because they are top notch & back up their work with a great warranty if anything ever were to crack or happen. What do you suggest me? |
That is just insne #'s on 93.
I would go 6466 and never look back. lol |
why u say this lexus?
|
dammit... maybe i should have done this instead of the ss 5858
|
Originally Posted by intoaevo
(Post 10822317)
must be reliable like that on 93 octane with only on 13 pounds. You just gave me an idea to do mine like that :). btw nice numbers and car.
Originally Posted by el.guerrero
(Post 10822393)
I also have a fullrace t4 twinscroll turbokit, planning to run after the rebuilt 93+ water/meth injection. I'm only confused if go for 6266 1.0 a/r t4 twinscroll or try the new 6466 1.0 a/r.
What do you suggest me?
Originally Posted by Lexus01IS
(Post 10822509)
That is just insne #'s on 93.
I would go 6466 and never look back. lol
Originally Posted by Silvermike
(Post 10822531)
dammit... maybe i should have done this instead of the ss 5858
|
the goal is 500. The reason i did not go with the 62xx turbo was bcuz this ca ris my DD and i was worried about loss of response. But the ts 6266 u tuned there looks brilliant.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands