E85 evo 9 turbo w/ bolt-ons 432hp 406tq!
Hello guys,
Got my evo 8 a few years ago and finally made the big switch to evo 9 turbo/e85. Had the car tuned by Sam @ RRE for dual map 91/e85. The car made 432whp/406tq on e85 and 351whp 319tq on 91; more power than I expected with currently 95k on the engine. :D Let me know what you guys think Mods: Evo 9 turbo evo 9 bov DIY COP MAP 02 dump 3port boost solenoid APR head studs hks racing suction intake w/ amsoil filter kelford 272 4.5in Sheepey intercooler RC 1200 injectors walbro 255 ETS licp ETS uicp Perrin exhaust 3inch Perrin down pipe 3inch Ultimate racing high flow cat 3inch https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.evo...e720c6ba8d.png https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.evo...d2954e0357.png https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.evo...e7f113538b.jpg |
Holy **** that's basically as much power as my HTA71.
**edit: Dynapak. Makes sense, sounds about right. Nice job! |
Excellent results:thumbup:
You and i have similar runs, both tuned at RRE |
that's a hot tune lol... good numbers,
|
Great numbers on that stock turbo man!
|
thanks everyone! The car is awesome, first gear rips hard.....only thing is I might need to replace the clutch soon :updown: Going to Buttonwillow race way in 2 weeks, hopefully it can hold up lol
|
Nice! Going the same route early next year! SAM@RRE FTW! #hecantuneafish
|
Fist pump! Go Sam go!
|
:lol:
|
Originally Posted by Gtimportfanatic
that's a hot tune lol... good numbers,
|
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
(Post 11852714)
It's about normal. That dyno reads high.
Usually by 10%, but these numbers don't seem off quite that much. Maybe 5%? |
Yes our Dynapack reads higher than the average Mustang dyno. But it is consistent with Dynojet AWD numbers, usually a touch lower. Maybe again we need a reminder and some perspective on the RRE Dynapack numbers: It's been a while.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...yno-graph.html Posts #22 and #98 Our Dynapack specifically was featured in an exhaustive dyno comparison test done by D-Sport magazine. https://www.dsportmag.com/the-tech/d...dyno-showcase/ Mike W |
Originally Posted by Mike W
(Post 11852718)
Yes our Dynapack reads higher than the average Mustang dyno. But it is consistent with Dynojet AWD numbers, usually a touch lower. Maybe again we need a reminder and some perspective on the RRE Dynapack numbers: It's been a while.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...yno-graph.html Posts #22 and #98 Our Dynapack specifically was featured in an exhaustive dyno comparison test done by D-Sport magazine. https://www.dsportmag.com/the-tech/d...dyno-showcase/ Mike W Let Sam know we have a few active threads that are praising his toons Joe :beer: @Mike W |
Originally Posted by Aidanlee1
(Post 11852676)
Great numbers on that stock turbo man!
|
Originally Posted by ConnorEvoIXMR
(Post 11853553)
509 on my stock turbo ;)
:lol: |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:17 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands