Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Buschur Racing dyno thread.....new developments.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 2, 2005 | 11:33 PM
  #436  
robi's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: socal
Originally Posted by ASTROEVO
wow... David sounds good.... cant sleep either
S#H#I#T# who cares about spool at 200!!!GT35R baby!!!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 12:40 AM
  #437  
evo81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 0
did you guys ever find out if the hks 280's worked with a flash.i think you said that al was coming last weekend to test it out????
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 02:48 AM
  #438  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
This car is running our BB580 which is a GT35R and always has been.
So, the BR580 is a GT35R and you've previously posted that a BR500 is a GT30R. What is a BR440?

Originally Posted by davidbuschur
To make a long story short I made multiple pulls over 600 whp and the datalogger never once hit 31 psi. Not even for an instant. Between tuning and a few experiments I tried I pulled the car 27 times. The best pull was 624 whp and 576 ft lbs of torque at 30 psi of boost.

With a peak boost of 22 psi at 7500 rpm the car still layed down 513 whp! I figure with pump gas in it and a timing number the car could live with it would still put 490 whp out like it is on 94 octane.
Wowee...congrats!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 03:41 AM
  #439  
SuperchargedGTZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ
wow david. as soon as i get rid of my other freakin, money sucking up car....you have defintely made my mind up with who to go to for a turbo kit...except i wont be getting the 580 or 500...i think i will just stick with the 440.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 07:34 AM
  #440  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
The computer is about 4 feet from the front of the car. Like I say, this is the 3rd one we had crash back there. HP, Compaq and a Gateway. It sucks as this time there was too much valuable testing information in it. Before they were just dyno runs that didn't matter much. Hopefully this guy can recover the stuff. Guess I'll order another Dell. As cheap as they are we have 6-7 of them here and have never had a problem with one.

The BR440, 500 and 580 are all non ball bearing turbos. The BR440 is not able to be built in a ballbearing cartridge. The 500 and 580 are equivelant to the GT30 and GT35R's but not exactly. The BR500BB and BR580BB are both true GT30 and GT35 ballbearing turbos. Difference in them being the turbine housings. We use a Mitsubishi style turbine housing on them, or have in the past. This was the idea behind the cast manifold we did, it allowed use of all the great DSM style turbos we have used in the past.

We have found though that here is a very large power difference in using the T3 housing on the GT30/GT35 turbos compared to the Mitsubishi housings we were using in the beginnning. We will probably only be offering these larger turbos with the T3 housings in the future. I am busy now converting a bunch of them that we did in beginning with the Mitsu housings on them. We made a billet adapter that goes between our cast manifold and the T3 housing which has worked out extremely well. What is going to end up happening is we are going to probably build a killer header for the car and then send it out and have it cast. Then we will offer two manifolds, one for the Mitsu style turbos and one for the T3 housings. The cost of doing the casting is extremely high and I am still thinking about our next plan.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 08:01 AM
  #441  
BigLEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
wow, great info, posting so i can subscribe
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 08:11 AM
  #442  
smackdaddy's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
From: NE PA
Just when I thought I about had my mind made up... I know your just pondering things at the moment, but any thoughts on a time frame on the new cast manifold for the T3 housing? Any thoughts on if we buy an older style kit with the adapter to T3 and then want the new style T3 manifold later?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 09:05 AM
  #443  
dipdm's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Dave sorry to hear about you PC issues. I use an external hard drive to keep anything important on PC crash and hard drive fail. Might want to look at an external raid set up so you can just throw about the OS and PC as needed and keep the data you want/need.
ping me off list if you need/want help with setting something up.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 09:52 AM
  #444  
TomG's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
DVD burner, and make automated backups...a life saver!

T
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 10:26 AM
  #445  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
<much snippage>
We have found though that here is a very large power difference in using the T3 housing on the GT30/GT35 turbos compared to the Mitsubishi housings we were using in the beginnning. We will probably only be offering these larger turbos with the T3 housings in the future. I am busy now converting a bunch of them that we did in beginning with the Mitsu housings on them. We made a billet adapter that goes between our cast manifold and the T3 housing which has worked out extremely well. What is going to end up happening is we are going to probably build a killer header for the car and then send it out and have it cast. Then we will offer two manifolds, one for the Mitsu style turbos and one for the T3 housings. The cost of doing the casting is extremely high and I am still thinking about our next plan.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Is there enough space to build a "universal" manifold with your own unique flange pattern that would allow you to create billet adapters for various turbine flange types? I guess realistically there's the Mitsu flange and the T3 but I'm just thinking that such an approach would allow you to standardize on a single casting. Or is it too much of a compromise from a flow standpoint?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #446  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I have a 256 MB Sandisk, never have used it. My own stupid fault that I lost all of this I guess.

The manifold we have now can be used for the T3 turbos with our adapter and Mitsu's without. The only other real flange out there is the T4 and we won't bother with an adapter for that. The Mitsu to T3 adapter came out really good and using the adapter with our manifold VS. a custom header on a GT35R there was no HP difference.

There is a slim chance that I may design a T3 manifold later and have it cast. There is a ton of expense involved in doing a casting so it is going to take some considering.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #447  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I did some datalogging on this GT35R car here that we made the 624 whp with.

On the dyno on the low boost pull of 513 whp the throttle went to WOT at 3191 rpm, this is in 4th gear. At 3695 rpm the car had 4.13 psi of boost. At 4688 rpm the car had 16.79 psi. At 5,000 rpm the car hit 19.8 psi. Ending boost was 22 psi, probaby a little bit of boost creep. I only made that one pull.

On the street with the boost set a peak of 30 psi doing a 3rd gear pull we went to WOT at 4547 and the boost was at 3.76 as soon as we did. At 5,000 rpm we had 23.45 psi and at 5375 rpm we had 30 psi. This held perfect at 30 psi to 7500 rpm when the pull was stopped.

For comparison. On the dyno with the RS I pull the car in 3rd gear. I start the pulls at 2,000 rpm every time. This particular pull I am looking at was when the car made the 387 whp. So it has a clipped and ported stock turbo with the 10.5 housing and ti/al wheel. WOT was at 2223 rpm. Boost was already .03 psi. At 3,000 rpm I had 7.31 psi. At 4,000 rpm I had 20 psi. The boost spikes to 24 psi and that happens at 4410 rpm. It then falls down to 21 psi by 5676 rpm and at 7504 rpm it is only 18.34 psi.

You can almost lay the two boost maps over top of each other from the stock turbo and the GT35R and see the dyno graph between the two. Stock is making a bunch more down low with the GT35R just running away from it over 5,000 rpm.

Just some interesting stuff, thought you guys might like it.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 04:13 PM
  #448  
KazzEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 2
From: Illinois
For those of us w/ADD following this AWESOME thread for so long can you sum up the mods on this beast??

GREAT job, David!!!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #449  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
What A/R turbine on the GT35R you were testing? I'm not sure if it's silly to assume .63...

Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I did some datalogging on this GT35R car here that we made the 624 whp with.

<snip>

Just some interesting stuff, thought you guys might like it.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2005 | 08:07 AM
  #450  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Kazz,

Which "beast" would you like me to sum up? The RS stock turbo car or the GT35R car?

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:34 AM.