Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

IC pipe size question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 11:20 PM
  #1  
Evoisdream's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
IC pipe size question?

hey guys just doing some reading and finding out that my IC pipe kit inner diameter might not b a full 2.5" might b more like a 2.25 well anyways i plan on upgrading my turbo and shooting for 450-500HP will this size difference make a difference at all? would it b wise for me to upgrade to a full 2.5" pipe kit? thanks


evoisdream
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 12:56 AM
  #2  
turbolarry's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA
S.C.C. ran a series of articles "Suck, Squish, Bang, Blow" which describes in great detail, the components of a complete turbo system and covered piping diameters;
"For setups under 300hp, the piping diameter should be kept to between 2 and 2.25 inches in diameter. For up to 400hp, 2.25 inches from the compressor discharge to the intercooler with 2.5 from the intercooler to the throttle body works well. For 500hp and up, 2.5 inches works pretty well."
S.C.C.
October 2001
page 304
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 01:12 AM
  #3  
Evoisdream's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Hrmmm so maybe i would only need to go with the new side...... i wonder if it would b a Noticeable difference like 30HP or something big.... if it was like 5 woudnt even worry about it
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 10:06 AM
  #4  
Evoisdream's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Hrmmmm
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 10:09 AM
  #5  
lil'evil_evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,424
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
I wouldn't worry about it. The Helix should be fine. Have you measured it?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 10:12 AM
  #6  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
On the Evo, the lower IC pipe is restrictive and you can get 5 or so HP with a better one like AMS, but you mostly gain spool up. The UICP will LOSE you HP if you are not pushing more than 25 psi or have a bigger turbo. Same principle as a bigger intercooler but none of the cooling properties. Just more space to fill. Both ICP's will help with more consistent boost though since there will be less rubber tubing to expand.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #7  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Evoisdream
hey guys just doing some reading and finding out that my IC pipe kit inner diameter might not b a full 2.5" might b more like a 2.25...
This shouldn't really matter much.

No matter how much boost you put through it, the volume of the engine remains a relatively small 2.0L. In other words, increasing the boost pressure does not increase the volume of air moving through the IC pipes - which stays relatively constant. This same principle applies to the TB and any component on the pressurized side of the turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #8  
Evoisdream's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
thanks for the help guys now less bends would make signifigantly more power or just slightly better spool etc.... like if i went from the helix top pipe to like the buschur one.... thanks again
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 02:31 PM
  #9  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Fewer bends is always better, but the value of "better" is directly proportional to the velocity of the air charge moving through the pipes.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #10  
plokivos's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,902
Likes: 4
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by turbolarry
S.C.C. ran a series of articles "Suck, Squish, Bang, Blow" which describes in great detail, the components of a complete turbo system and covered piping diameters;
"For setups under 300hp, the piping diameter should be kept to between 2 and 2.25 inches in diameter. For up to 400hp, 2.25 inches from the compressor discharge to the intercooler with 2.5 from the intercooler to the throttle body works well. For 500hp and up, 2.5 inches works pretty well."
S.C.C.
October 2001
page 304
for the minimal requrement i would think.

and it's back in october 2001.

i think 3" would be more than enough for anything under 400whp.

would go 3.5" for 500whp under with 4" exhaust.

just makes more sense on boosted car to have a bigger travel with shorter pipe.

with those numbers, you would need a bigger pipe for the bigger turbo anyway,.

stock's 2.5" all the way, exhaust, intake, ic pipes.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #11  
hueman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 2
From: northern virginia
any more substantial info from our vendors or anyone?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2005 | 11:53 AM
  #12  
inarut's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Thanks for the info.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #13  
MrMejia's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Oceanside
so the buschur 2.5 inch lower intercooler pipe should be fine for a stock turbo setup? Or will I get lag? I do have a tune for it.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 10:11 PM
  #14  
MrMejia's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 701
Likes: 1
From: Oceanside
bump
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 01:43 AM
  #15  
Jakeg97's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
Originally Posted by MrMejia
so the buschur 2.5 inch lower intercooler pipe should be fine for a stock turbo setup? Or will I get lag? I do have a tune for it.
no tune needed, less lag , quicker spool
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:36 AM.