My ATP 3071 dynoed…
My ATP 3071 dynoed…
I had my car dynoed today, you can see the mods in the signature. I think this dyno might be very different from the ones you guys are used to, this is a system which use four individual dynamometers that you put on each hub after removing the wheels. Here’s some information on the system they use:
http://www.rototest.com/index.php?DN=28
I had my car ran there when it was 100% stock three years ago and I then got these numbers: (at the hubs)
269hp @ 6500rpms
359Nm @ 3500rpms
Today I got these numbers:
367hp @ 7000rpms
454Nm @ 5000rpms
All the measurements were made using a static method braking the engine in 500rpm intervals for three seconds. We also made a sweep measurement between 2000-7500rpms but I don’t have the results from that run yet.
I really can’t compare these figures very well with other runs on here as I don’t think any were made in static intervals so we have to use my stock run as comparison.
They dyno crew though that the torque was dropping of a bit too much, don’t know if it’s the turbo that is the limiting factor or something else?
They said to calculate 12% transmission loss, if I count 367/0,88 I get 417hp in the engine, don’t know if that is a good estimate?
Any comments?
http://www.rototest.com/index.php?DN=28
I had my car ran there when it was 100% stock three years ago and I then got these numbers: (at the hubs)
269hp @ 6500rpms
359Nm @ 3500rpms
Today I got these numbers:
367hp @ 7000rpms
454Nm @ 5000rpms
All the measurements were made using a static method braking the engine in 500rpm intervals for three seconds. We also made a sweep measurement between 2000-7500rpms but I don’t have the results from that run yet.
I really can’t compare these figures very well with other runs on here as I don’t think any were made in static intervals so we have to use my stock run as comparison.
They dyno crew though that the torque was dropping of a bit too much, don’t know if it’s the turbo that is the limiting factor or something else?
They said to calculate 12% transmission loss, if I count 367/0,88 I get 417hp in the engine, don’t know if that is a good estimate?
Any comments?
If you got 269 hp when the car was stock then its safe to think that the numbers on that "dyno" are very high since hp at the crank for a stock Evo is around 276. You got 367 hp after the turbo, thats pretty damn low if you ask me. Those numbers are very low since a stock turbo can easily push those numbers with all the right mods (TBE, Cams, etc). A Dynojet shows about 235-240 whp for a stock Evo and 330-340 for a modded Evo with cams, so a 100 hp increase is attainable easily with the stock turbo.
Originally Posted by superz
If you got 269 hp when the car was stock then its safe to think that the numbers on that "dyno" are very high since hp at the crank for a stock Evo is around 276. You got 367 hp after the turbo, thats pretty damn low if you ask me. Those numbers are very low since a stock turbo can easily push those numbers with all the right mods (TBE, Cams, etc). A Dynojet shows about 235-240 whp for a stock Evo and 330-340 for a modded Evo with cams, so a 100 hp increase is attainable easily with the stock turbo.
I did a few G-tech runs as well and I got pretty consistent 11,6-11,7 times @ 120mph, what does that say about the power? I'll be trying some real 1/4 runs with proper timing equipment in a few weeks to verify those G-tech numbers.
Last edited by EVOVII_SWE; May 2, 2005 at 07:32 AM.
Originally Posted by Kuba23
damn 11.6 = 400-420 whp
At least not until I’ve had them proved with proper timing equipment 
Also, I always though it was the speed that told you most about the power not the time? I was using both launch control and anti lag when doing those times so you could probably say that I used the power more effectively.
Last edited by EVOVII_SWE; May 2, 2005 at 07:39 AM.
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by EVOVII_SWE
I did a few G-tech runs as well and I got pretty consistent 11,6-11,7 times @ 120mph, what does that say about the power? I'll be trying some real 1/4 runs with proper timing equipment in a few weeks to verify those G-tech numbers.
Originally Posted by 3deep
So how does the car feel after the new tune.Did you get rid of the surging.Have you changed your boost or cams.
Originally Posted by lil'evil_evo
How do you like the G-tech? I always wondered how good there numbers were.
Originally Posted by Ted B
FYI: Don't put much stock in that G-Tech. It's a neat toy for A/B testing, but I found it's accuracy to be rather optimistic when it comes to 1/4 E.T.s.
Originally Posted by EVOVII_SWE
I did a few G-tech runs as well and I got pretty consistent 11,6-11,7 times @ 120mph, what does that say about the power? I'll be trying some real 1/4 runs with proper timing equipment in a few weeks to verify those G-tech numbers.
I have an HP calculator on my forum www.aktivematrix.com if you want to figure it out again if you have an accurate weight on the car... All these calculations aren't exactly accurate, and throw in the GTech pro which can be a MPH and Tenth off..
Last edited by MalibuJack; May 2, 2005 at 12:57 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Extreme Tuners
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
1932
Jul 19, 2012 09:59 AM
9sec9
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
10
Nov 26, 2007 08:57 PM







