4g63 supercharger?
well with the help of 3240 i have decided that a stroker is just more economical.... but with that... who would be the best to go with... I really like JUN's but 6600 for a kit that most people sell for 2kish... isnt that good of a deal.... anyway that for another thread... just wanted to put this one to rest
the end
the end
I used to be into SCs. I had one on my Civic w/ GSR motor. I liked how it boost from idle to redline. But to tell you the truth, a turbo has so much more potental it rediculous.
Once again... I dont want a huge turbo... also I was wanting a twin charged system... all the low end of a SC and all the top end of a Turbo... Like having a 502 big block in my Evo.
20G9-5 (not the LT) and a 2.3 stroker kit, all from Buschur, and your car will be an ANIMAL!
You'll have plenty of torque down low.
Or you could just hit it with a 50 shot at low rpm.
You'll have plenty of torque down low.
Or you could just hit it with a 50 shot at low rpm.
Originally Posted by yellowEVO21
um, "making good boost"?
do you mean make good numbers to go along with that "quick spool"?
do you mean make good numbers to go along with that "quick spool"?
... i mean the 20g can handle more boost than our stock 16g, with almost stock like spool up..
buschur racings 20g makes good numbers also
sorry for the misunderstanding lol
Originally Posted by joseph143
my goal when i first built the car was 400 crank horse.... after damn near meeting that in just the first four months of owning it i decided to build the bottom end of the power band... something a turbo cant do... Turbo lag is the ultimate foreplay... but why have foreplay when you can get straight to the real thing first.
Why dont you just go back to V8's?....You will spend less money getting what you want and not near the headaches?
Plus you can always build a forced induction V8 that has everything you want?
Plus you can always build a forced induction V8 that has everything you want?
Originally Posted by travman
Why dont you just go back to V8's?....You will spend less money getting what you want and not near the headaches?
Plus you can always build a forced induction V8 that has everything you want?
Plus you can always build a forced induction V8 that has everything you want?
I think the stroker is the best deal if you're willing to go that route. It will compound increases in power from other modifications later on with proper tuning.
only a draw through style supercharger rather then a centrifugal supercharger would help with low end torque. These systems are usually mounted on top of the engine thus causing spacing issues. There is no substitute for displacement when it comes to low end torque. this would be a piping and EMS nightmare when combining both.
There is currently a manufacturer, i think volkswagen, that has a dual system running on a one liter engine. maybe you can study that configuration.
only a draw through style supercharger rather then a centrifugal supercharger would help with low end torque. These systems are usually mounted on top of the engine thus causing spacing issues. There is no substitute for displacement when it comes to low end torque. this would be a piping and EMS nightmare when combining both.
There is currently a manufacturer, i think volkswagen, that has a dual system running on a one liter engine. maybe you can study that configuration.
Last edited by pkradgreek; Oct 11, 2006 at 02:20 PM.
Originally Posted by pkradgreek
I think the stroker is the best deal if you're willing to go that route. It will compound increases in power from other modifications later on with proper tuning.
only a draw through style supercharger rather then a centrifugal supercharger would help with low end torque. These systems are usually mounted on top of the engine thus causing spacing issues. There is no substitute for displacement when it comes to low end torque. this would be a piping and EMS nightmare when combining both.
There is currently a manufacturer, i think volkwagen, that has a dual system running on a one liter engine. maybe you can study that configuration.
only a draw through style supercharger rather then a centrifugal supercharger would help with low end torque. These systems are usually mounted on top of the engine thus causing spacing issues. There is no substitute for displacement when it comes to low end torque. this would be a piping and EMS nightmare when combining both.
There is currently a manufacturer, i think volkwagen, that has a dual system running on a one liter engine. maybe you can study that configuration.
The cobra mustang Idea is the worst thing i have ever hear... Mainly because i despise the mustang... Way to over produced....
My Evo is running is the one running the 400 hp... Its not quite there but its close... I need just a few more things and then to have it tuned again and It will be there.








