results from tuning my IX!
This is from the "Build and Price" section of the Mitsubishi site. Just want to get it understood. If its really 286 at the crank then okay I get it, if not then just looking for the explanation.
http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/j...d.do?loc=en-us
Factory performance-tuned (2.0-liter, MIVEC DOHC, 16-valve, turbocharged and intercooled) engine with 286 horsepower and 289 lb-ft of torque
http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/j...d.do?loc=en-us
Factory performance-tuned (2.0-liter, MIVEC DOHC, 16-valve, turbocharged and intercooled) engine with 286 horsepower and 289 lb-ft of torque
This is from the "Build and Price" section of the Mitsubishi site. Just want to get it understood. If its really 286 at the crank then okay I get it, if not then just looking for the explanation.
http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/j...d.do?loc=en-us
Factory performance-tuned (2.0-liter, MIVEC DOHC, 16-valve, turbocharged and intercooled) engine with 286 horsepower and 289 lb-ft of torque
http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/j...d.do?loc=en-us
Factory performance-tuned (2.0-liter, MIVEC DOHC, 16-valve, turbocharged and intercooled) engine with 286 horsepower and 289 lb-ft of torque
I have seen stock IX's (early builds) make 286 uncorrected stock and 261 corrected on Dynojets. Dont be so quick to lump all of them together in the 286 @ the crank.
Last edited by JohnBradley; Jan 9, 2007 at 11:30 AM. Reason: add'l information.
Got it, thanks for clearing it up.
In part its cause it was on a Dyno Dynamics and was running 19psi of boost. Both those factors are going to make it lower than what some IX's have been dyno'd at.
I have seen stock IX's (early builds) make 286 uncorrected stock and 261 corrected on Dynojets. Dont be so quick to lump all of them together in the 286 @ the crank.
I have seen stock IX's (early builds) make 286 uncorrected stock and 261 corrected on Dynojets. Dont be so quick to lump all of them together in the 286 @ the crank.
It wasn't necessarily required, but it's a safety item. Running 25psi is not smart on 93oct, but it's even less smart on 93oct with the stock fuel pump, so you make the call...
Senator, you didn't know power numbers listed by manufacturers were also to the crank and weren't even measured but rather estimated? You also didn't know that dynos read differently and that a DD reads the lowest of all? Strange.
John, 19psi isn't low - that's normal. Being a DD is why it's low.
Senator, you didn't know power numbers listed by manufacturers were also to the crank and weren't even measured but rather estimated? You also didn't know that dynos read differently and that a DD reads the lowest of all? Strange.
John, 19psi isn't low - that's normal. Being a DD is why it's low.
Some of the higher reading AWD dynos (Like the Dynojet) will read stock whp at ~255.
No one knows how much power you make at the crank - you can't base it off your WHP. You'd have to put it on an engine dyno, so even trying to guess the crank numbers is useless.







