2.3 l vs 2.0 l

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 18, 2007 | 12:33 PM

#31

hondafan

Evolved Member

iTrader: (25)

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 1,854

Likes: 4

From: york, PA

Quote:

Originally Posted by ALLBLACK-EVO

if you have a 600HP built 2.0 then lets find out shall we?

i wish i did, but unfortunately on my salary, i'm lucky to even have afforded to buy a new evo when i did.

Jun 18, 2007 | 01:11 PM

#32

ALLBLACK-EVO

Evolving Member

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 139

Likes: 0

From: Pacific Palisades

I can respect that.

Jun 18, 2007 | 02:53 PM

#33

SIGSP2340

Newbie

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 98

Likes: 0

From: East Coast

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hot Wheelz

Lets say two of the same cars @600whp, one is 2.3 other is 2.0, on the highway who would have the advantage from lets same a 70 mph highway bomb?
Thanks for the thoughts!

Well the bigger liter car "should" pull out ahead because of the quicker spool and more torque but thats not saying the guy running the 2.0 can't brake boost. It basically narrows down to who is the better driver.

Something else to keep in mind. Sure the 2.3 , 2.4 obviously provide more torque but that rises more issues with drivetrain failure specially if you plan on keeping the car stock weight.

Quote:

Originally Posted by HOSTILE_EVO

this guy said it. the ultimate drag motor is the destroked 2.1l from ams. it uses a 4G64 block and a 4G63 crank.

I could be wrong. But didn't Curt Brown run a destroked 2.1L and went back to a BR 2.0L ?

Jun 30, 2007 | 04:36 AM

#34

RobDogg

Account Disabled

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Dec 2005

Posts: 347

Likes: 0

From: San Diego

Breaking in my 2.3 l too dude! I can't tell everyone how awesome it is to boost instantly.. i mean 2400rpms in fourth at 30mph the car is frickin movin it's the best modification choice i could have ever made.. Following the worst (RnR 35r)