he has a thread on here about it evil evo viii
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...=cosworth+cams

 

If you read his post, that mustang dyno only reads 5-6% lower dynojet, so on a dynojet he would make 362 which is not bad.

 

which one ıs the best so hks 272 or cosworth 272

 

my friend ross made 317whp on the same dyno on a evo9 with factory cams and intercooler,just intake exhust boost controler and a tune.

 

so you didnt break in the cams?

 

I Think this is the real 1st hks mivec test showen not enough test

 

my one 315 whp wıth stock cams and turbo
76 mm all pıpes blıtz last muffler (no cat)
rallıart fılter kıt pıpes and fılter
avc r
ecu flash (ı made)
hks twınplate
walbro 255
rallı art sport thermostat
hks ırrıdyum plugs
rallı art specıal plug wıres

 

i agree with this as for the dyno each dyno reads different so it does not make a difference what he posted about wich dyno read different so it doesnt make an difference as to what he says they can be calibrated in different ways.

 

Thats my car hes referring to, It was on 93 oct and it was 102* in the dyno bay that day.. And my car was road tuned NOT dyno tuned

 

Not trying to start a which cam is better war, just wanted to share my experience with everyone else. I wanted something different. I can say tonight it was about 80deg and the car was like a night and day difference...pulls hard. Is that gonna give you a good test...no, but for just under $600 someone else can give it a shot. I'm happy with my results..no doubt my numbers would be higher on 23psi and 93 Oct...BUT can't get 93 in Oklahoma so it's not practical. However, a splash of race gas at the track will give me the difference and you guys the numbers you're looking for.

PS.

After looking at a few of the Cosworth dynosheets...numbers aside...my peak torque seems to come nearlier, in the 3500-3600 range...which is great for getting out of the hole.

 

well hks make good products as well as cosworth at the same time if you have read my first post it worked you maid more power then what you had befor and your happy with your car thats what counts.congrats

 

How much tuning was needed on the AFR (fuelling)? With the HKS Cams, did it make your car run leaner?

Well Done!

 

Congrats Buddy - nothing wrong with HKS Cams!!!

Comon guys give the member a break man the numbers don't tell the whole story...

Anyway tunning is about what you want out of your car from your set-up and not everybody chooses a stick of "dynomite" when they want a cherry bomb! right? RIGHT!

Anyway Cams on the 9 don't give you the bolt-on 40-50HP like on the VIII because the stock IX cams are very very Good... So without going ultra agressive with much more lift + springs and retainers you can only expect about 15-25HP with an improved Torque and Power Curve on stock Turbo...

peace out!

.

 

well put Sal
are your HKS in yet dude!!

 

should be here this week, was at Nxgen last wed night till like 3am craig was tunning EVO_8-ZN 2.3L with the PT67 set-up that things a Monster!!!

.