Stock UICP no go.
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stock UICP no go.
I was running the stock UICP and a AMS LICP, my car was having very high intake temps, and knocked, because my pipe was rubbing on the radiator inlet and side..
So i picked up a ETS UICP and my car has 0 knock, spools faster, and pulles harder.. any one running just the LICP get the UICP. The stock one is Bottleneck and is too close to the radiator..
So i picked up a ETS UICP and my car has 0 knock, spools faster, and pulles harder.. any one running just the LICP get the UICP. The stock one is Bottleneck and is too close to the radiator..
#7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was running the stock UICP and a AMS LICP, my car was having very high intake temps, and knocked, because my pipe was rubbing on the radiator inlet and side..
So i picked up a ETS UICP and my car has 0 knock, spools faster, and pulles harder.. any one running just the LICP get the UICP. The stock one is Bottleneck and is too close to the radiator..
So i picked up a ETS UICP and my car has 0 knock, spools faster, and pulles harder.. any one running just the LICP get the UICP. The stock one is Bottleneck and is too close to the radiator..
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Annandale, NJ
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
running Nisei Engineering 1018 Lower Intercooler Pipe with no probems. good thing for steel too, must have bottom it out multiply times and its scratched to $#%, an aluminum one would have been destroyed by now.