Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

To heat rap my down pipe or not to? your thaughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 04:55 PM
  #16  
ItsStockOfficer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Originally posted by mhgsx


Ok, I'll bite.

The problem with your 'horn' theory is that you're causing the exhaust pulses to lose energy as the propigate down the pipe. How? Because that pulse has a set amount of energy. Now you're asking it to expend it's energy to fill up a larger and larger space. ( assuming you get a perfect taper like a horn) Not to mention that the exhaust pulse is already losing energy due to transfer of heat to the piping. Basically, by increasing the exhaust diameter as you go further from the turbo, you're actually increasing backpressure as pulse after pulse hits each other as it goes down the piping.

I would rather go from a 3" downpipe, into a 3" cat-con, then into a tapering 2.5" catback.
IM gonna hafta say this is even worse. Going from bigger to smaller is just ineffcient. I prefer big all the way if I can. It add significant power over a 2.5 inch down pipe.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:25 PM
  #17  
mhgsx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Wouldn't the velocity increase or at least not slow down as the piping tapers down? A similar concept would be intake runner design. Most taper down into the head.

And I never said to use a 2.5" downpipe. I would still use a 3" one to help maximize the pressure differential between the downpipe and exhaust manifold.

And I would still use a 3" cat since the cat represents the most backpressure source for the entire exhaust.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:27 PM
  #18  
ItsStockOfficer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
The velocity would definitley increase if you went from larger to smaller, but that does not mean its moving more volume. it would not.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 05:30 PM
  #19  
Quickshift's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: MD
I wouldnt worry about needing to heat wrap the pipe. I have there full 3in turbo back unit and did not heatwrap any of it. I have not expereinced any problem such as over heating the oil or anything of that nature (I have an oil temp sensor by the oil filter).
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:01 PM
  #20  
x7eVoLuTiOn7x's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 259
Likes: 1
From: philippines
I was also planning to wrap my apexi 3" downpipe to lessen the heat going to the engine.
Question is would wrapping it cause the downpipe to rust or crack when you get it wet all the time?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:08 PM
  #21  
ItsStockOfficer's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Originally posted by x7eVoLuTiOn7x
I was also planning to wrap my apexi 3" downpipe to lessen the heat going to the engine.
Question is would wrapping it cause the downpipe to rust or crack when you get it wet all the time?
I imagine if it got wet and you drove it around the block hard it would not be wet any more, as for cracking, it should not. I have never actaully seen that happen, and I had an RnR DP wrapped for quite a while. Im sure every now and then a bad down pipe gets out from every vendor, but I think if it doesn't crack from all the extreme heat cycling and flexing, it probably never will.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EvoEmperor4G63
Evo General
17
Feb 28, 2006 05:58 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:32 AM.