New BW EFR Turbo Thread
a couple photos:

^^^This is one of my favorite manifolds weve ever built at Full-Race. EFR Internal-WG ONLY it will not work with any other turbo. I personally worked hard on this, paying special attention to the runner geometry and smooth flowing runners with no cheats or short radius bends - just optimally flowing properly paired cylinders in a very compact space. This photo shows the mock-up, and you can see part of the collector points at the wastegate port, the other part points at the volute. boost control is rock-solid, zero creep

^^here is a clearer engine bay shot for you jalal - the kit looks sooo clean without wastegates, dumptubes, bov or boost solenoid. everything is right on the turbo, ultra-OEM looking. Its one of the easier kits ive plumbed also, since the oil return is tapped and the feed fitting came from the oil filter housing

fitting 275/35/18 BFG R1 road race slicks, i need less offset or more fender "massaging" since my 18x9.5 are +22 are barely clearing

at the dyno the other day, will try and upload youtube vids next

^^dynochart repost

This is the turbo shaft speed gauge, i really like it. very simple to use. I installed this unit the other day and will be updating firmware today and finishing up the vid on it after. i have to keep stopping whatever im doing to give everyone joyrides, its like the state fair everyone wants to go for a ride

^^^This is one of my favorite manifolds weve ever built at Full-Race. EFR Internal-WG ONLY it will not work with any other turbo. I personally worked hard on this, paying special attention to the runner geometry and smooth flowing runners with no cheats or short radius bends - just optimally flowing properly paired cylinders in a very compact space. This photo shows the mock-up, and you can see part of the collector points at the wastegate port, the other part points at the volute. boost control is rock-solid, zero creep

^^here is a clearer engine bay shot for you jalal - the kit looks sooo clean without wastegates, dumptubes, bov or boost solenoid. everything is right on the turbo, ultra-OEM looking. Its one of the easier kits ive plumbed also, since the oil return is tapped and the feed fitting came from the oil filter housing

fitting 275/35/18 BFG R1 road race slicks, i need less offset or more fender "massaging" since my 18x9.5 are +22 are barely clearing

at the dyno the other day, will try and upload youtube vids next

^^dynochart repost

This is the turbo shaft speed gauge, i really like it. very simple to use. I installed this unit the other day and will be updating firmware today and finishing up the vid on it after. i have to keep stopping whatever im doing to give everyone joyrides, its like the state fair everyone wants to go for a ride
Last edited by Geoff Raicer; Feb 18, 2012 at 01:51 PM.
I'm jealous of that top mount manifold and the setup looks awesome. I am a true believe of the TS setups based on my own results. I also appreciate the tech tips from FULL RACE as I was building my TS manifold. I contemplated a Short Runner TS design using an internally gated BW turbo, but the turbos are hard to obtain. Please keep posting pics and results.
Question about the bearings:
Are the inner races (2 parts) an interference fit (press fit) onto the shaft?
What I'm thinking about is, what are the chances that they could actually move slightly on the shaft during use, thereby messing up the bearing clearance?
On the other hand, if they are locked down tight to the shaft, then they would follow the shaft axially - thermal expansion and contraction wise. If there was ever much of a temperature difference between the shaft and the outer bearing race - then again there would be a bearing clearance problem. Assuming the shaft temporarily hotter than the outer race, the bearings would temporarily be too loose.
Here's a pic of the inner races (2 parts) from the EFR video:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Are the inner races (2 parts) an interference fit (press fit) onto the shaft?
What I'm thinking about is, what are the chances that they could actually move slightly on the shaft during use, thereby messing up the bearing clearance?
On the other hand, if they are locked down tight to the shaft, then they would follow the shaft axially - thermal expansion and contraction wise. If there was ever much of a temperature difference between the shaft and the outer bearing race - then again there would be a bearing clearance problem. Assuming the shaft temporarily hotter than the outer race, the bearings would temporarily be too loose.
Here's a pic of the inner races (2 parts) from the EFR video:
[IMG]
[/IMG]Ball bearings were used on a few Nissan applications in the 90's (SR20s) and are currently used on the Ford Powerstroke diesel. If they can survive an OEM diesel application, they are plenty durable.
It would be nice to have some good pics or diagrams of the Garrett bearing system. But I don't think they use angular contact bearings. The way the parts are split up (like the inner races) so that they can be assembled is likely different.
Designing and manufacturing a ball bearing system that works robustly at ~140,000 rpm while running on a shaft that is subject to large rapid temperature fluctuations is not exactly a walk in the park.
What I am thinking is that BW tried very hard to hit a home run with this bearing system - rotating inertia wise, and drag wise. I don't think that it is configured the same as any of the other turbo ball bearing systems that are "proven". It is not configured the way I would have tried to do it. My way would still have used 2 angular contact ball bearings, but it would have had more bearing drag and more rotating inertia, because it would require a 3rd bearing at the other end, allowed to float axially. The 2 angular bearings would have been back to back, right next to each other. So basically, my suspicion is that BW took a higher risk approach, hoping to hit a home run performance wise, relying on a long period of testing to run down any real-world problems. I think the testing is .... not exactly over!
Last edited by Talonboost; Feb 18, 2012 at 04:13 PM.
I can understand your curiosity, but in all honesty - you have no idea what youre talking about with respect to these turbos and what does or does not work. I am not at liberty to address any of this formally, just letting you know these turbo bearings are taking more than 13 times the thrust load that the airwerks turbos can handle, and there is no way for their laboratory test stands to create any more thrust load IE they can not overload these BB's to failure
here is a video of the EFR speed sensor install on my evo8- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B196nyntLbQ the last few seconds show some in-car footage
sent him a couple emails a couple months ago with no reply.
Last edited by n2oiroc; Feb 18, 2012 at 05:00 PM.
I am not at liberty to address any of this formally, just letting you know these turbo bearings are taking more than 13 times the thrust load that the airwerks turbos can handle, and there is no way for their laboratory test stands to create any more thrust load IE they can not overload these BB's to failure
Geoff, I doubt that these items are really an issue and I'm not trying to bad-mouth BW in any way. I just think it's an area of interest. Anybody who has been in engineering for a long time I'm sure has several stories of problems that were not solved until after a product went into production. I sure do. These things are not easy. I understand that you can't get into it in any detail because the information is intellectual property, so I'm not going to bug you for it. I also know that BW has some cool equipment for measuring and watching shaft oscillation, so I'm sure that if there is a problem they will figure it out. Here's a pic from the EFR video showing the display of this machine. Some of the labeling on the display: Shaft motion plot, Shaft motion vs turbo speed, Amplitude. Cool stuff.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
here is a video of the EFR speed sensor install on my evo8- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B196nyntLbQ the last few seconds show some in-car footage
Last edited by EvoDan2004; Feb 18, 2012 at 09:03 PM.








