Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Stock 2.0L with GT3076R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #1  
jameswwt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 2
From: The Universe
Stock 2.0L with GT3076R

Hi Guys, is it safe for a complete stock 2.0L pushing 360awhp with only a GT3076R turbo & RON91 pump gas?
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 10:35 AM
  #2  
evolve_VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 2
From: michigan
Yea. My friend is running the Buschur 3076r kit and made 420+ on 93 at 24psi
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 10:41 AM
  #3  
GotEvo9's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Socal
How much power can the stock internals handle with a safe tune
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 10:44 AM
  #4  
jameswwt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 2
From: The Universe
Originally Posted by GotEvo9
How much power can the stock internals handle with a safe tune
Yes, i want to know it too
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 12:37 PM
  #5  
evolve_VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 2
From: michigan
It varys. There are plenty of threads discussing this. Ive seen some guys run into the 10s with a stock bottom end. Not sure of the power though. Mainly 500 or so. Its the torque that will cause more problems. You can adjust the tune to get more hp and less tq to keep it safer.

I made 475awhp at AMS a few years back on stock bottom end. The torque was 390. Chris didnt want to push the tq curve and risk breaking things. Plus I had to drive it home.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 12:43 PM
  #6  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-hta3076.html

443whp stock bottom end.

Its not power that breaks parts, its torque and then how the torque looks in the dyno chart. If it makes 400 ft lbs at 3000rpm there is more load on the rods there than 400 ft lbs at 7000.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 06:41 PM
  #7  
jameswwt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 2
From: The Universe
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-hta3076.html

443whp stock bottom end.

Its not power that breaks parts, its torque and then how the torque looks in the dyno chart. If it makes 400 ft lbs at 3000rpm there is more load on the rods there than 400 ft lbs at 7000.
Hi Aaron,
thanks for sharing and how to we control (increase & decrease) by tune?
Izzit by just increasing timing or boost?

Thanks
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 06:52 PM
  #8  
jameswwt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 2
From: The Universe
Originally Posted by evolve_VIII
It varys. There are plenty of threads discussing this. Ive seen some guys run into the 10s with a stock bottom end. Not sure of the power though. Mainly 500 or so. Its the torque that will cause more problems. You can adjust the tune to get more hp and less tq to keep it safer.

I made 475awhp at AMS a few years back on stock bottom end. The torque was 390. Chris didnt want to push the tq curve and risk breaking things. Plus I had to drive it home.
Thanks Evolve for sharing
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 05:13 AM
  #9  
evolve_VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 456
Likes: 2
From: michigan
No problem. Chris pulled timing in the mid range power band to keep the tq lower. As Aaron said, the mid range tq will cause added stress on the rods and they are the weak link in the bottom end.

I was running a turbonetics 62-1 turbo.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2013 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
jameswwt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 2
From: The Universe
Originally Posted by evolve_VIII
No problem. Chris pulled timing in the mid range power band to keep the tq lower. As Aaron said, the mid range tq will cause added stress on the rods and they are the weak link in the bottom end.

I was running a turbonetics 62-1 turbo.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rom
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
25
May 15, 2017 04:47 PM
SpeedI2acerX
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
Nov 4, 2016 01:40 PM
SBR INC
Vendor Classifieds
37
Sep 20, 2011 11:57 AM
esevo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
0
Mar 17, 2008 05:29 PM
riceball777
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
1
Feb 6, 2007 09:28 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:50 AM.