Stock 2.0L with GT3076R
It varys. There are plenty of threads discussing this. Ive seen some guys run into the 10s with a stock bottom end. Not sure of the power though. Mainly 500 or so. Its the torque that will cause more problems. You can adjust the tune to get more hp and less tq to keep it safer.
I made 475awhp at AMS a few years back on stock bottom end. The torque was 390. Chris didnt want to push the tq curve and risk breaking things. Plus I had to drive it home.
I made 475awhp at AMS a few years back on stock bottom end. The torque was 390. Chris didnt want to push the tq curve and risk breaking things. Plus I had to drive it home.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-hta3076.html
443whp stock bottom end.
Its not power that breaks parts, its torque and then how the torque looks in the dyno chart. If it makes 400 ft lbs at 3000rpm there is more load on the rods there than 400 ft lbs at 7000.
443whp stock bottom end.
Its not power that breaks parts, its torque and then how the torque looks in the dyno chart. If it makes 400 ft lbs at 3000rpm there is more load on the rods there than 400 ft lbs at 7000.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...e-hta3076.html
443whp stock bottom end.
Its not power that breaks parts, its torque and then how the torque looks in the dyno chart. If it makes 400 ft lbs at 3000rpm there is more load on the rods there than 400 ft lbs at 7000.
443whp stock bottom end.
Its not power that breaks parts, its torque and then how the torque looks in the dyno chart. If it makes 400 ft lbs at 3000rpm there is more load on the rods there than 400 ft lbs at 7000.
thanks for sharing and how to we control (increase & decrease) by tune?
Izzit by just increasing timing or boost?
Thanks
Trending Topics
It varys. There are plenty of threads discussing this. Ive seen some guys run into the 10s with a stock bottom end. Not sure of the power though. Mainly 500 or so. Its the torque that will cause more problems. You can adjust the tune to get more hp and less tq to keep it safer.
I made 475awhp at AMS a few years back on stock bottom end. The torque was 390. Chris didnt want to push the tq curve and risk breaking things. Plus I had to drive it home.
I made 475awhp at AMS a few years back on stock bottom end. The torque was 390. Chris didnt want to push the tq curve and risk breaking things. Plus I had to drive it home.
No problem. Chris pulled timing in the mid range power band to keep the tq lower. As Aaron said, the mid range tq will cause added stress on the rods and they are the weak link in the bottom end.
I was running a turbonetics 62-1 turbo.
I was running a turbonetics 62-1 turbo.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SpeedI2acerX
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
Nov 4, 2016 01:40 PM
SBR INC
Vendor Classifieds
37
Sep 20, 2011 11:57 AM







