Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Lets talk simple fueling for 850-950whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 20, 2013 | 10:03 PM
  #1  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Lets talk simple fueling for 850-950whp

With winter coming Ive decided its time to let go of the stock appearing turbo setup and connect a proper turbo to my motor. Once I get a new master cylinder in my car and hope thats why I suddenly lost my clutch pedal a few days ago after MONTHS of chasing lockout/engagement issues with multiple clutches, I will be selling a lot of parts from my car.

Ultimately, the goal is somewhere in the 850-950 range for a 150-155mph trap car with either a 6466 or a 6766 (probably the 64 since I only rev to 9000 and it should be lots of fun on my 2.4L, especially in the twinscroll configuration Im envisioning)

I already have FIC 2150's, and now I have stock send and return lines with two Walbro 255's on a Buschur double pumper. The car spends 90% of its life on E85 and 93 is put in every 1000 miles just for safetys sake to clean any gunk that may grace the injector tips with its ugly presence.


So, I know I need to upgrade my pumps and I know I need to upgrade my send line.

My questions are...
A. What pumps do I go with to replace my Walbros?
B. Do I leave the stock return line OR do I replace it with a -6 return?
C. What FPR do I go with?

Again, my goal is keep this all very simple. Id like a simple set of pumps that can drop right onto the double pumper setup and clip right in without any wild modifying. As much as Id like to run a fuel cell, I dont see it happening as of now.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 01:08 AM
  #2  
GotWheelHop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Jason (angryevo8) trapped 161 on a pair of Aeromotive 320's. Should be all you need to feed that hungry 6466/2.4 combo. As for an FPR, any of the replacement FPR setups you can buy will suffice. Such as the one from STM or MAP.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 08:32 AM
  #3  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Akash ran dual 255s, big lines, x4 2150s and was out at 905whp. Now it has dual 450s and went from a 12.2 to a 10.1 with no other changes.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 11:35 AM
  #4  
420a-t's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 735
Likes: 1
From: Idaho Falls, ID
I'm guessing that was at lower bfp? Or 43.5? ^^^
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 12:33 PM
  #5  
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 15
From: Lexington Park, MD
Aaron, was that an -8AN feed and -6AN return?
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 01:17 PM
  #6  
AngryEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 1
From: Joliet IL
Originally Posted by GotWheelHop
Jason (angryevo8) trapped 161 on a pair of Aeromotive 320's. Should be all you need to feed that hungry 6466/2.4 combo. As for an FPR, any of the replacement FPR setups you can buy will suffice. Such as the one from STM or MAP.
This was also with hardwiring the primary pump. I ran -8 feed and the stock return with a fuel lab mini Also made 850 on Boostins mustang dyno. Not that I really like the idea of relying on a second pump to kick on but it will get the job done.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 03:19 PM
  #7  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
hmmm yes I was looking into the 450s. keeping two 255s sounds interesting but I dont want you to have to tune my injectors to like 90+ IDC Aaron :P

I was thinking this perhaps too...leave one 255 as the primary and get one 450 and use that pump as the secondary wired to my hobbs switch. Thats a little more fuel than two 340s and Ill only have to change one pump.

so I taake it is ok then to run a stock return then too? I was interested in the mini regulator for sure.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2013 | 07:49 PM
  #8  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Svendiesel
hmmm yes I was looking into the 450s. keeping two 255s sounds interesting but I dont want you to have to tune my injectors to like 90+ IDC Aaron :P

I was thinking this perhaps too...leave one 255 as the primary and get one 450 and use that pump as the secondary wired to my hobbs switch. Thats a little more fuel than two 340s and Ill only have to change one pump.

so I taake it is ok then to run a stock return then too? I was interested in the mini regulator for sure.
my guess is it would be best to run the 450 as a primary and the 255 as a second pump. either way i think you may need a FPR but at least the fuel pressure spike will be much less with the 255 as your second pump.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2013 | 07:59 PM
  #9  
exhaust_note's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
You wouldn't want the 450 to feed the 255 because the 450 is going to outflow the 255 and the 255 will basically just become a bottleneck at that point.


The 255 feeding the 450 on the other hand should work fine.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2013 | 09:52 AM
  #10  
way2qik's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 651
Likes: 5
From: With my admirers in the BACK ROOM!
My fuel system is two 450s both hardwired in and both running the whole time with -8 feed and -6 return.

Why not just run both pumps the whole time? I've not had any problem with overwhelming the regulator. Just get a good one. To me, the idea of having the second pump on a hobbs switch is chancy. What if the switch fails? It will ruin your engine...
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2013 | 02:09 PM
  #11  
Frew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
^^^this
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2013 | 06:30 PM
  #12  
detroit pistins's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 19
From: Detroit
Running them simultaneously is a better bet but its an extra load at idle.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2013 | 08:32 PM
  #13  
Lexus01IS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
From: CT
How much WHP stock lines are good for with twin walbro 255?
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2013 | 09:10 PM
  #14  
GotWheelHop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 807
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by exhaust_note
You wouldn't want the 450 to feed the 255 because the 450 is going to outflow the 255 and the 255 will basically just become a bottleneck at that point.


The 255 feeding the 450 on the other hand should work fine.
The pumps run in parallel, not in series. Which pump activates first has no impact on maximum flow or volume. Having the 450 on full time lessens the fuel pressure spike when the secondary pump kicks on. For example, when my secondary 255 kicks on, my fuel pressure IMMEDIATELY spikes to 70-75psi. The factory regulator gets a bit overwhelmed at first, but then starts doin it's job.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2013 | 09:22 PM
  #15  
silvertune's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: MN
Hardwired 255's, AN 8 feed, AN 6 rail and return, Fuel Lab AN 6 inline mounted at the firewall. I'm not playing anywhere near 900whp but if I were the only thing I'd have to change is putting in bigger pumps.

The fuel system upgrades cheaper than just about anything else in the car. If you're running hard wired pumps they'll be going full blast all the time. You might be able to get away with a stock FPR or return but why put the stress on the pumps? 10 feet of AN line and a good FPR is worth the controllability and longevity you'll gain from it.

The rail is the big one though. I have a friend with a 2.4 FP black and he was running stock everything except injectors and a twin 255 setup and you could see the AFR gradient across his plugs like they'd come out of different motors and different mileages.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:15 AM.