Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FP rear housing problems, laggy, low HP, HELP!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2016, 05:12 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
MR1JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 45
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FP rear housing problems, laggy, low HP, HELP!

Greetings from Australia!

I run an Evo 7 RS over here and we have recently switched the motor out for a built 2.3L after the old built 2L gave up the ghost a few months ago

Basic specs are as follows:

High compression 2.3L (9.8:1)
Mild head porting
Kelford 272 degree cams
GTPumps 792 Turbo with FP Stainless rear housing and Turbosmart 40mm external gate

The GTpumps 792 is a proven performer on evo's here, unfortunately I am the first person here to try it on a 2.3 with the FP housing though, a mate has tried it with a 2.55L and it made 380+ KW at the wheels

Basically the issue we are having is the turbo is very very lazy, takes ages to spool, we dont see usable power until 5K RPM which isnt really suitable or right for a high compression stroker.

Not to mention the peak power is only 302kw, which is way too low for this setup.

Dyno sheet here:

Name:  2221c85f-a26f-4751-b1a8-618686ad7afd_zpsj3c85g2p.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  378.5 KB

My question is where do we start looking to find this issue? Could it be a wastegate issue? The fabricator who made the screamer and dump pipe is adamant he installed the gate correctly with the ring to seal.

Any help would be appreciated!

Last edited by MR1JZ; Jun 1, 2016 at 06:27 PM.
Old Jun 1, 2016, 07:58 PM
  #2  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
You should expect about 500rpm slower spool up and slower transient response with the single scroll housing vs a twin scroll MHI housing.
Old Jun 1, 2016, 09:14 PM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
MR1JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 45
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I gather it will be a little bit laggier but that laggy with what I consider to be **** all top end something else is the contributing factor surely?
Old Jun 1, 2016, 09:20 PM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
MR1JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 45
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A couple of people have suggested cam timing could be out...possible?
Old Jun 2, 2016, 06:38 AM
  #5  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
I'm not familiar with the gt792. What size is the compressor?

Part of the issues could he you're using a turbo smart 40mm gate on a tial 38mm flange.

Which line on the graph is boost?
Old Jun 2, 2016, 05:51 PM
  #6  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,695
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
IIRC, the GT Pumps bigger turbo spooled like an FP Black and put down power like a Red. By adding the single scroll housing you're only making that worse. So you turned 4500rpm spool up into 5000 spool up.

I think that actually makes sense and lines up with what I've seen (which isn't a lot for those GT Pumps turbos).

http://www.gtpumps.com.au/

Also looks like you're not really pushing the turbo too much...~26 or 27psi
The following users liked this post:
MR1JZ (Jun 4, 2016)
Old Jun 3, 2016, 05:17 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TheBoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Space time
Posts: 1,278
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Did you check all the basics.


Boost leak test
Compression test
Timing Sync - make sure 0* on the computer is 0* on the motor.
Check Timing belt to make sure all timing marks are on point.
AFR's
Timing numbers
Fuel type


More info, but check the basics first.
The following users liked this post:
Erik@MIL.SPEC (Jun 3, 2016)
Old Jun 3, 2016, 11:09 PM
  #8  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Also, does GTP use the same turbine as FP? If they're not the same size, you're killing performance.
Old Jun 4, 2016, 12:54 AM
  #9  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
MR1JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 45
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rear wheel is identical.

Have checked for boost leaks and found nothing.

Engine builder is 100% confident cam timing is correct

Motor was blueprinted at 9.8:1 compression, adding more boost does nothing to the peak power figure, we might have narrowed it down to a restriction in the exhaust, back on dyno next week with a straight pipe to see if that makes a difference. Will post here with the results.
Old Jun 4, 2016, 12:56 AM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
MR1JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 45
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Erik@MIL.SPEC
IIRC, the GT Pumps bigger turbo spooled like an FP Black and put down power like a Red. By adding the single scroll housing you're only making that worse. So you turned 4500rpm spool up into 5000 spool up.

I think that actually makes sense and lines up with what I've seen (which isn't a lot for those GT Pumps turbos).

http://www.gtpumps.com.au/

Also looks like you're not really pushing the turbo too much...~26 or 27psi
Not pushing the turbo yet because more boost does nothing to improve peak power, after actually giving the car a proper run on the road it feels very usable for what i want to do with it (circuit racing)

Hopefully the exhaust makes a difference, if it does I will get busy making a 4" exhaust
Old Jun 4, 2016, 08:19 AM
  #11  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
You should not need a 4" exhaust. This is my car on an FP red with a 3 exhaust on an O2 dump. MHI twin scroll turbine housing. Something else is wrong with your car unless you had a broken muffler or collapsed catalytic converter.
Attached Thumbnails FP rear housing problems, laggy, low HP, HELP!-photo96.jpg  
Old Jun 4, 2016, 03:50 PM
  #12  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
MR1JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 45
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
You should not need a 4" exhaust. This is my car on an FP red with a 3 exhaust on an O2 dump. MHI twin scroll turbine housing. Something else is wrong with your car unless you had a broken muffler or collapsed catalytic converter.
If it is the rear muffler restricting it then the straight pipe will resolve it but make it undrivable on the road

This is how loud it is with the muffler on the back


The idea behind a 4" exhaust would be to keep it quiet(er) whilst maintaining good exhaust flow
Old Jun 4, 2016, 04:37 PM
  #13  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
My car has a 3" exhaust that was quite quiet until I took it to a track day lol. It has a large magnaflow muffler at the back of the car, and a resonated test pipe.
Keeping a 4" exhaust quiet is going to he hard.
Old Jun 4, 2016, 05:29 PM
  #14  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (94)
 
Erik@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,695
Received 23 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by MR1JZ
Not pushing the turbo yet because more boost does nothing to improve peak power, after actually giving the car a proper run on the road it feels very usable for what i want to do with it (circuit racing)

Hopefully the exhaust makes a difference, if it does I will get busy making a 4" exhaust
It's been shown by lots of different testing that even a 3.5" exhaust isn't needed unless you're running super-high hp (800+).

I only mentioned boost because you had said it only made xxx hp...and most all of the stock-based turbos need lots of pressure to make good power.

Like I said before, I know those GTPumps turbos are popular in AUS and NZ, but all the plots I've seen show FP Red power with FP Black spool...and that's with an MHI housing. You have a SS housing on there which makes everything worse (spool wise).

I think a ported MHI housing would help eliminate some of your issues.

Good luck and I hope you find the issue (although I think it's the turbo).
Old Jun 4, 2016, 06:05 PM
  #15  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
MR1JZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 45
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would have liked to have gone FP red but two factors put me off

1. Cost (the usd is horrible against the AUD at the moment) A borg warner would have cost me about the same
2. Local support for the GTP, I have been able to speak to Mark about these issues over the phone, not a luxury I would have really had with an FP turbo


Quick Reply: FP rear housing problems, laggy, low HP, HELP!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 PM.