Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Borg Warner s200sxe (s257)

Old Jan 12, 2018, 05:10 PM
  #76  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
cficare68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 358
Received 34 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Strm Trpr
Damn that's awesome, I can't wait to hear about your build!

Please keep us posted!

I have a 99 GSX I'm building for road racing track days and street sweeping...

I have a virgin 99 4G63 and a virgin 99 4G64 I can build.

I can't decide which to build, a LR2.4L or a 94mm stroker....


I'm building a drag car with the Talon. I'm just doing a standard 2.0 for it.
Old Jan 13, 2018, 07:07 PM
  #77  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 330
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Nice cant wait to see the results on that 257!
Old Jan 13, 2018, 08:50 PM
  #78  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
DSM*BOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice!
Old Jan 16, 2018, 05:40 PM
  #79  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
cficare68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 358
Received 34 Likes on 30 Posts
Test fitted the turbo today. Man its tiny compared to my 6466.
The following users liked this post:
Strm Trpr (Jan 16, 2018)
Old Jan 16, 2018, 09:12 PM
  #80  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 330
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Looking good!
Old Jan 21, 2018, 07:14 AM
  #81  
Evolving Member
 
RWD4G63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Mattawan, MI
Posts: 152
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by SnailSpeed
Any more info on this car? power figures?
He just got it on the dyno. Makes 520whp and 400ft/lbs of torque at 28lbs. He's going to run more boost but keep torque down as it's a stock block (lame I know). Also, boost threshold is a bit high because of the 1.22 housing (I told him it would), so he's considering moving down a size or two in A/R. I'll try and get a graph for you guys.
Old Jan 21, 2018, 11:00 AM
  #82  
Evolving Member
 
Strm Trpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NorCal
Posts: 201
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by RWD4G63
He just got it on the dyno. Makes 520whp and 400ft/lbs of torque at 28lbs. He's going to run more boost but keep torque down as it's a stock block (lame I know). Also, boost threshold is a bit high because of the 1.22 housing (I told him it would), so he's considering moving down a size or two in A/R. I'll try and get a graph for you guys.
Excellent!
Looks like a consolidated runner T4 top mount.
Interested to see to boost plot or at least know when 28psi is reached.

Old Jan 21, 2018, 10:37 PM
  #83  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 330
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by RWD4G63
He just got it on the dyno. Makes 520whp and 400ft/lbs of torque at 28lbs. He's going to run more boost but keep torque down as it's a stock block (lame I know). Also, boost threshold is a bit high because of the 1.22 housing (I told him it would), so he's considering moving down a size or two in A/R. I'll try and get a graph for you guys.
Thats decent, is this on pump gas?
Old Jan 21, 2018, 11:01 PM
  #84  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
SnailSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 330
Received 32 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by awhit17
Speaking on response and powerband, I think the Borg Warner EFRs can be better than some of the stock frame options. With the price of stock frame bb turbos surging, the difference in price is not so bad either. On top of this, the overspeed resistance with the smaller wheels is much better if you are worried about that kind of thing.

This is my car with a twin scroll IWG 7163 on pump gas, at a flat 24.5psi. We decided to soften the tq at lower RPM for max safety.

on Flickr

I would still like to drive a well setup FP Red/Green car before making statements, but on the road with this turbo my car is very, very responsive. The dyno only tells part of the story. Also, I like the way my car sounds over the stock frame stuff. A little more even but not raspy.


on Flickr
Sounds pretty good in the videos! I have a thing for how the evos exhaust note sounds lol. Most of the time when you change the manifold the sound changes a lot, sounds more like a boosted honda. This setup sounds pretty good tho!
Old Jan 22, 2018, 06:49 AM
  #85  
Evolved Member
 
2winscroll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 816
Received 81 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by SnailSpeed
Sounds pretty good in the videos! I have a thing for how the evos exhaust note sounds lol. Most of the time when you change the manifold the sound changes a lot, sounds more like a boosted honda. This setup sounds pretty good tho!
Looks like full boost by 3600 rpm on the 7163. That s200sxe won’t even be close to that with the 1.22 a/r single scroll. Even a 1.15 a/r won’t touch that on a single scroll manifold. 1.22 is made more for a twin scroll application. M2C
Old Jan 23, 2018, 06:51 PM
  #86  
Evolving Member
 
RWD4G63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Mattawan, MI
Posts: 152
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by SnailSpeed
Thats decent, is this on pump gas?
I’ll double check on fuel. Definitely not done tuning.

Originally Posted by 2winscroll
Looks like full boost by 3600 rpm on the 7163. That s200sxe won’t even be close to that with the 1.22 a/r single scroll. Even a 1.15 a/r won’t touch that on a single scroll manifold. 1.22 is made more for a twin scroll application. M2C
The 1.22 and 1.15 are twin scroll housings. If you’re talking about the car i posted, it is a twin-scroll manifold. He’s trying to get a hold of a 1.00 I believe.
Old Apr 16, 2019, 11:04 AM
  #87  
Newbie
 
Shamsiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Virginia
Posts: 63
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
We can finally put this to rest. I'm doing a stock short block built head, Ported w Kelford 272s, s257sxe open t3 .82 off a tubular ramhorn, I'm shooting for 500whp on e85. It'll be tuned on a mustang dyno so numbers may be low. Neither my tuner nor the shop whos installing it believe it will happen since they're used to the older box charger sx series. However I really think that this setup can do it, hopefully it if these numbers show some promise this will turn into a popular option for DSM/Evo guys. It should be getting tuned in a few weeks to a month.
Old Apr 16, 2019, 07:48 PM
  #88  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
cficare68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 358
Received 34 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Shamsiel
We can finally put this to rest. I'm doing a stock short block built head, Ported w Kelford 272s, s257sxe open t3 .82 off a tubular ramhorn, I'm shooting for 500whp on e85. It'll be tuned on a mustang dyno so numbers may be low. Neither my tuner nor the shop whos installing it believe it will happen since they're used to the older box charger sx series. However I really think that this setup can do it, hopefully it if these numbers show some promise this will turn into a popular option for DSM/Evo guys. It should be getting tuned in a few weeks to a month.
I already did it. Except i have a 2.4 and kelfords 276 cams. Made approx 520hp. On about 32 psi. Ran into back pressure issues though. Was a fun turbo but sold it and went back to my 6466.
Old Apr 16, 2019, 08:31 PM
  #89  
Newbie
 
Shamsiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Virginia
Posts: 63
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by cficare68
I already did it. Except i have a 2.4 and kelfords 276 cams. Made approx 520hp. On about 32 psi. Ran into back pressure issues though. Was a fun turbo but sold it and went back to my 6466.
I mean't stock bore/stroke stock compression results. Since that's most likely the kind of people that will be using this kind of turbo. It peaks right around the middle to end of the acceptable range of a stock block. I also have the perfect turbine housing size for that goal, and its an open t3 so you can't really get anymore of a baseline that than.
Old Apr 17, 2019, 12:20 PM
  #90  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
cficare68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 358
Received 34 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Shamsiel
I mean't stock bore/stroke stock compression results. Since that's most likely the kind of people that will be using this kind of turbo. It peaks right around the middle to end of the acceptable range of a stock block. I also have the perfect turbine housing size for that goal, and its an open t3 so you can't really get anymore of a baseline that than.
I'm 8.5:1 comp on my 2.4 so thats lower than stock compression and thats the same turbine housing I ran on mine. Only advantage im going to have over a stock bottom end is spool due to the 2.4 and a more aggressive cam setup. Turbo would be prefect for a stock bottom. Spec'd out size wise it is close to a journal bearing fp red. Reminded me a lot of mine old gt3076r. For the price its definitely a fun turbo.
The following users liked this post:
Shamsiel (Apr 17, 2019)

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Borg Warner s200sxe (s257)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:45 PM.