Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Vented VS. Sealed Catch Can Test, which is Better? Watch to find out!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 14, 2017, 08:48 AM
  #31  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Does the vent line to the intake pipe have any sort of venturi or scavenging geometry? Or does it simply tee into the intake pipe at a 90 degree angle with nothing sticking into the intake pipe?
Old Nov 14, 2017, 11:01 AM
  #32  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
Does the vent line to the intake pipe have any sort of venturi or scavenging geometry? Or does it simply tee into the intake pipe at a 90 degree angle with nothing sticking into the intake pipe?
Just a standard -10AN bung welded onto the intake pipe from the catch can and a -6AN bung welded onto the intake pipe from the valve cover.
Old Nov 14, 2017, 11:50 AM
  #33  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
V.8MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: STL
Posts: 2,230
Received 226 Likes on 155 Posts
Well I'm going to be running the STM sealed setup with an STM SD intake with re-circulation pipe for the DV. I dont like the idea of "polluting" the cold side of the motor with oil etc, but expect I'll have the stuff off for cleaning if it becomes a problem.

Turbo is a 71HTA.

Hope I made the right choice here vs going to a VTA setup.
Old Nov 15, 2017, 07:18 PM
  #34  
Newbie
 
Evo8noob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: California
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
following
Old Nov 16, 2017, 03:31 AM
  #35  
Admin Emeritus
 
Speedlimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NR Reading PA
Posts: 2,239
Received 100 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by Evo8noob
following



Edit:

There is no need to add 'following' to threads you want to follow. Look under the lower nav bar under 'Thread Tools'. Seclect 'Subscribe'. Thanks.

Bob
Old Nov 20, 2017, 03:26 PM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
03whitegsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,001
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
I also run a sealed catch can setup, routed to intake, but on my Evo 10.

Here is a log of the car with crankcase pressure at WOT showing vacuum while in boost, 600whp.
Would be interesting to see what it looked like if you pulled off the intake filter.
Old Nov 20, 2017, 03:38 PM
  #37  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
Would be interesting to see what it looked like if you pulled off the intake filter.
It would but I won't. I like my compressor in one piece.

It's a decent size filter. It barely fits. (pressed up against headlight harness) I would have to get a custom intake to fit a larger filter.

It's 6"x7.5"x5.1"

Old Nov 20, 2017, 03:48 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
03whitegsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,001
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
ah come on...for the sake of our internet criticism???

I suppose it's kind of irrelevant though. It pulls that much vacuum in the crank case, regardless of if it's from the Bernoulli effect or static pressure drop due to the filter.

Also, I might have been fortunate in the past in that I really never had turbos that leaked oil though the compressor seals. Seeing all the issues many modern DI turbo motors are having with valve deposits and oil build up in the intercooler, maybe sucking oil into the intake is not any more of an issue then the typical amount spit out by the turbo. At least we have fuel in the intake tract to help deal with it...
Old Nov 20, 2017, 03:52 PM
  #39  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
ah come on...for the sake of our internet criticism???

I suppose it's kind of irrelevant though. It pulls that much vacuum in the crank case, regardless of if it's from the Bernoulli effect or static pressure drop due to the filter.
I'm just happy I'm not getting positive crank case pressure at 640whp and 28psi.
Old Nov 21, 2017, 03:53 PM
  #40  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (12)
 
Pal215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,915
Received 345 Likes on 262 Posts
Very good information here. I think at the bear minimum, everyone should be running a sealed catch can between the rear of the valve cover and the intake manifold nozzle. This way they are not letting the intake suck oil vapor directly into the combustion chamber like the stock setup does. The only thing I did differently on that side was that I placed the oem pcv valve right at the Intake manifold vacuum nozzle and not on the crank case entry side of the catch can. This way you're not pressurizing your catch can under boost, which can be just another boost leak source.

As long as you are seeing less pressure in the crank case than what it takes to push oil back up the oil return line of the turbo, then you're in good shape.

The more restrictive your intake filter is, the more vacuum you will see at the intake pipe port.

Last edited by Pal215; Nov 21, 2017 at 06:32 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roni4g63
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
4
Dec 17, 2016 08:54 PM
Kemist
Evo General
49
Feb 24, 2010 11:31 PM
XK120
For Sale - Interior / Exterior / Sound / Styling
10
May 27, 2009 01:31 PM
NeX
Lancer Audio and Security (All models)
13
Mar 29, 2003 02:45 AM



Quick Reply: Vented VS. Sealed Catch Can Test, which is Better? Watch to find out!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:06 AM.