Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

htuff rods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2018, 09:36 PM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Crank bearings failed?
Old Mar 20, 2018, 02:59 AM
  #32  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
inin36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 79
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
yes it did.
Old Mar 20, 2018, 04:09 AM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
RS200's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 610
Received 118 Likes on 95 Posts
Originally Posted by inin36
9k. acl bearings. was on motul xcess iirc when it gave way


can share link for the recommendation?
http://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/man...f-rods.499390/
Old Mar 20, 2018, 11:58 AM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by inin36
yes it did.
That doesn't make sense. It doesn't seem like the cause is the rod and piston combo. And oil seems odd too since their purpose is to lubricate.
Old Mar 20, 2018, 01:12 PM
  #35  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (12)
 
Pal215's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,915
Received 345 Likes on 262 Posts
Main bearing failure is more rare than rod bearing failure, but it can happen under a few circumstances.

1. The main bearing oil clearance was not set properly
2. The Crank was bent
3. Loss of oil pressure/oil film strength
4. Bearing crush pressure was lost due to improper torque spec on main studs, causing the cradle to back off (highly unlikely with single piece, cast iron cradles)

On the rod bearing side the list is similar, but it's much easier to spin a rod bearing because all what's needed is to stretch a rod bolt.


I'm sure that I beams will cause the rod bolts to stretch faster than lighter weight rods, but if you keep your engine low reving (7500 - 8000rpm) it won't be too much of an issue.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 20, 2018)
Old Mar 21, 2018, 07:45 PM
  #36  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
inin36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 79
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
That doesn't make sense. It doesn't seem like the cause is the rod and piston combo. And oil seems odd too since their purpose is to lubricate.
Im not sure of what the exact caused as i left it to my mech to work on it. was told its the oil.

Originally Posted by Pal215
Main bearing failure is more rare than rod bearing failure, but it can happen under a few circumstances.

1. The main bearing oil clearance was not set properly
2. The Crank was bent
3. Loss of oil pressure/oil film strength
4. Bearing crush pressure was lost due to improper torque spec on main studs, causing the cradle to back off (highly unlikely with single piece, cast iron cradles)

On the rod bearing side the list is similar, but it's much easier to spin a rod bearing because all what's needed is to stretch a rod bolt.


I'm sure that I beams will cause the rod bolts to stretch faster than lighter weight rods, but if you keep your engine low reving (7500 - 8000rpm) it won't be too much of an issue.
Thanks for the info the engine was 3 to 4 years old after rebuilt. The crank wasnt bent but definitely there was loss of oil press.

Let me share what had happened.
i had 2.0 built engine and was using amsoil and motul 300v. the car was running t3 gt37 pushing 700hp for few years and had no issue. changed to fp black and used motul xcess got it tuned 2 days later before the bearings give way.
i had few frenly drag with some frens, 1st run was fine, after 2nd run the oil temp shoot pass 110, water temp was only 86 and oil pressure drop below 1.3bar. let it cool down and check oil and radiator. topped up few ml of oil. Start again, at idle, it shot passed 110 within 1min. decided to call it a day while on the way back, the engine was vibrating badly, oil press fluctuated and oil temp hovers at 115 so i suspected either oil pump gave way or oil gotten thin.. stopped somewhere after bearings gave way and got it towed to my mechanic. During the runs, i was on low boost - 1.5bar and shift gears at only 7.5krpm.

So i decided on 2.2kit. Gotten htuff which is thicker than normal h beams but there wasnt much info on this rod. Wish to know before tune and how far i can push it.

Last edited by inin36; Mar 21, 2018 at 07:51 PM.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 21, 2018)
Old Mar 21, 2018, 08:08 PM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by inin36
Im not sure of what the exact caused as i left it to my mech to work on it. was told its the oil.



Thanks for the info the engine was 3 to 4 years old after rebuilt. The crank wasnt bent but definitely there was loss of oil press.

Let me share what had happened.
i had 2.0 built engine and was using amsoil and motul 300v. the car was running t3 gt37 pushing 700hp for few years and had no issue. changed to fp black and used motul xcess got it tuned 2 days later before the bearings give way.
i had few frenly drag with some frens, 1st run was fine, after 2nd run the oil temp shoot pass 110, water temp was only 86 and oil pressure drop below 1.3bar. let it cool down and check oil and radiator. topped up few ml of oil. Start again, at idle, it shot passed 110 within 1min. decided to call it a day while on the way back, the engine was vibrating badly, oil press fluctuated and oil temp hovers at 115 so i suspected either oil pump gave way or oil gotten thin.. stopped somewhere after bearings gave way and got it towed to my mechanic. During the runs, i was on low boost - 1.5bar and shift gears at only 7.5krpm.

So i decided on 2.2kit. Gotten htuff which is thicker than normal h beams but there wasnt much info on this rod. Wish to know before tune and how far i can push it.
What was the specs of your old engine (if you don't mind giving out that info)?
Old Mar 21, 2018, 08:26 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
How is your new 2.2 kit compared to 2.0? Is it bored bigger or stroked?
Old Mar 22, 2018, 02:15 AM
  #39  
Evolved Member
 
kikiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 2,026
Received 269 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
How is your new 2.2 kit compared to 2.0? Is it bored bigger or stroked?

2.2 is 94 mm crank...
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 22, 2018)
Old Mar 22, 2018, 08:01 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by kikiturbo
2.2 is 94 mm crank...
And I assume pistons are about 86.25 mm to get 2.196 L or 86.5 mm to get 2.2096 L?

Crank/rod radius increases by 3.4%. And goal rev linit is still 9000 RPM?

I think proportion to 1.997 L, 9000 RPM should be reduced to 8426 RPM. Otherwise, it's like pushing your 2.0 L 9000 RPM to 9614 RPM.

Last edited by 2006EvoIXer; Mar 22, 2018 at 08:15 AM.
Old Mar 22, 2018, 08:46 AM
  #41  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Max bore size on 4g63 is 86mm. .020" over (85.5mm) with 94mm crank is ~2.16L.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 22, 2018)
Old Mar 22, 2018, 06:57 PM
  #42  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
inin36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 79
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
yeap 94mm crank. i might start a new thread for my build. now lets come back to the topic..

Last edited by inin36; Jan 2, 2019 at 05:28 PM.
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Mar 22, 2018)
Old Apr 2, 2018, 07:38 PM
  #43  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
inin36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 79
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
ups
Old May 17, 2018, 09:33 PM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
ExViTermini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
For the record the htuff 156mm do not clear the block with the 100mm crank. Clearancing like with ibeam's is required.
Old May 30, 2018, 01:16 AM
  #45  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
inin36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Singapore
Posts: 79
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ExViTermini
For the record the htuff 156mm do not clear the block with the 100mm crank. Clearancing like with ibeam's is required.
correct.


Quick Reply: htuff rods



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:31 AM.