EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)
-   Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-engine-turbo-drivetrain-22/)
-   -   question on upgrading fuel lines - difficult to remove stock lines? (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-engine-turbo-drivetrain/585944-question-upgrading-fuel-lines-difficult-remove-stock-lines.html)

anthonyrb98 Nov 25, 2011 09:23 PM

question on upgrading fuel lines - difficult to remove stock lines?
 
i'm planning on upgrading my fuel lines to stainless braided ones, and was wondering how hard it is to replace the hard lines that go under the car and in the engine compartment. are the oem supply and return lines somehow linked together under the car? is it a simple unbolt and remove affair? i currently have a parallel fuel setup with an intank and external pump and i plan to upgrade the oem supply line after the "Y". Can i simply replace the supply line and leave the return line in place if i decide to keep the stock return line? i plan to upgrade to 8an supply. i will be running an aftermarket fuel rail and regulator.

TurboTravis Nov 25, 2011 09:39 PM

I'm going to ask for my own fuel system sticky soon...

1) There is NO reason to use ANYTHING bigger than a -6 feed line. Period. I'm currently making 790WHP on E85 with -6 Feed line, stock regulator, stock return line. Buschur DP W/modded 255's supplies it. I started to see the stock fuel feed line becoming a restriction at around 700whp, and the -6 feed line TOTALLY solved that.

2)Use Aeroquip pushloc. It's the most readily available Ethanol compatable fuel line. Most of your braided line is not, and even if you can find it compatible, it's more expensive, heavier, and a PITA to cut/terminate.

anthonyrb98 Nov 26, 2011 05:50 AM

Good info. Thanks. Can u explain how u replaced the stock feed line then?

TurboTravis Nov 26, 2011 09:37 AM


Originally Posted by anthonyrb98 (Post 9774902)
Good info. Thanks. Can u explain how u replaced the stock feed line then?

I left it in place (incase I wanted to use it in the future), and used Adel clamps to hold the new line.

anthonyrb98 Nov 26, 2011 10:16 AM

fair enough...

mrfred Nov 26, 2011 09:41 PM

Hard line (e.g., stainless steel tubing) is a better option.

TurboTravis Nov 26, 2011 10:15 PM


Originally Posted by mrfred (Post 9776292)
Hard line (e.g., stainless steel tubing) is a better option.

Enlighten me

mrfred Nov 26, 2011 11:11 PM


Originally Posted by TurboTravis (Post 9776336)
Enlighten me

Stainless tubing is guaranteed to last forever. Good quality braided line that you suggest is fine but at some point, it will need to be replaced. I suppose it depends on the timespan that's important. 10 years of life from ethanol compatible braided line seems quite reasonable, so it should be good for most people.

TurboTravis Nov 26, 2011 11:33 PM


Originally Posted by mrfred (Post 9776412)
Stainless tubing is guaranteed to last forever. Good quality braided line that you suggest is fine but at some point, it will need to be replaced. I suppose it depends on the timespan that's important. 10 years of life from ethanol compatible braided line seems quite reasonable, so it should be good for most people.

Show me where I suggested braided line...

mrfred Nov 27, 2011 12:10 AM


Originally Posted by TurboTravis (Post 9776430)
Show me where I suggested braided line...

ok, you got me, Aeroquip Socketless (I assume this is what you meant by pushloc) has a rubber external sheath and not a braided external sheath.

TurboTravis Nov 27, 2011 12:19 AM


Originally Posted by mrfred (Post 9776459)
ok, you got me, Aeroquip Socketless (I assume this is what you meant by pushloc) has a rubber external sheath and not a braided external sheath.

{thumbup}

Properly routed, it'll last the life of the car. Even if it had to be replaced once or twice, it's still way easier than farting around with bending a solid line. Aluminum is not compatible with all fluids, and stainless is a pain to flare correctly.

LCS Nov 27, 2011 08:33 AM

When I bought my car it came with a blue -6AN Aeroquip hose running from pump to fuel rail. I changed it for a black one -aesthetics, you know - mostly because I was concerned about a 7 year old hose. On the end the old hose was fine, without cracks and no britle feeling. At least I´ve got a cleaner looking engine.

mrfred Dec 3, 2011 06:45 PM


Originally Posted by TurboTravis (Post 9774622)
....

2)Use Aeroquip pushloc. It's the most readily available Ethanol compatable fuel line. Most of your braided line is not, and even if you can find it compatible, it's more expensive, heavier, and a PITA to cut/terminate.

So I did a bit of research on ethanol compatible hose. Aeroquip socketless looks fine, but its not obvious to me that there is something about it that makes it stand above the rest. Goodridge 811 or 910 PTFE lined smooth bore hose looks good to me, and attaching the AN fittings doesn't look difficult.

I've not had time to get a look under the car - is there a fitting, e.g. at the transition from flex to hardline, where I can easily switch over to hose?

mrfred Dec 4, 2011 09:38 AM

For kicks, I did a few pressure drop calculations using different ID fuel lines and flow rates (http://www.pressure-drop.com)

**Inputs**
- Fuel line length - 10 ft (approx distance from the tank to the fuel rail)
- Assume straight pipe
- Fluid - pure ethanol (0.789 gr/cm3, coefficient of viscosity = 0.001095 Ns/m2)


**Pressure Drop Results**
*Scenario 1* --- Flow rate: 4.4 l/min (Four 1100 cc/min injectors maxed out)
Factory hardline (~0.25" ID) - 4.5 psi pressure drop
- 6 AN hose (~0.38" ID) - 0.6 psi pressure drop
- 8 AN hose (~0.50" ID) - 0.2 psi pressure drop

*Scenario 2* --- Flow rate: 6.7 l/min (~800 whp on E85)
Factory hardline (~0.25" ID) - 9.3 psi pressure drop
- 6 AN hose (~0.38" ID) - 1.3 psi pressure drop
- 8 AN hose (~0.50" ID) - 0.4 psi pressure drop

Scenario 1 approximates my setup. For a Walbro 255, a ~4 psi pressure drop reduces fuel flow by about 12 L/hr or reduces max power potential for a given AFR by about 25 whp (due to the reduced flow).

anthonyrb98 Dec 4, 2011 09:52 AM

wow, the hardline really restricts flow!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:40 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands