testdrove a 2.7t audi a6 today
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: north jersey (15 min from nyc)
testdrove a 2.7t audi a6 today
my brother was interested in getting a used audi 2.7t a6 quattro 2002 so we both testdrove it, im not sure if anyone here drove one before, but is it just me, or is that car way too slow for a 250hp awd car? i know its not supposed to be evo fast but that thing is slower than a maxima, or at least it felt that way, and i punched it too so its not like i was running off boost
with a flash that car can run low 12's
edit. at least what my buddy who is an audi mechanic says, but its not supposed to be fast it just looks good, its a heavy b1tch never the less.
edit. at least what my buddy who is an audi mechanic says, but its not supposed to be fast it just looks good, its a heavy b1tch never the less.
Originally Posted by lookEVO
with a flash that car can run low 12's
edit. at least what my buddy who is an audi mechanic says, but its not supposed to be fast it just looks good, its a heavy b1tch never the less.
edit. at least what my buddy who is an audi mechanic says, but its not supposed to be fast it just looks good, its a heavy b1tch never the less.
Kind of like the 1.8Ts. Slow as crap but you get owners who think they're fast because it has a turbo. Power to weight ratio is poor on a lot of the Audi's. I had a friend who chipped one and it never ran right afterward.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Well, you know that's not true. Low 12s on something that heavy that doesn't even run 13s stock? Chips do great things on turbo'd audis, but to hit low 12s, he'd need around 400whp.
that was kinda what i told him. I think we was just trying to say that it didnt matter. that car isnt supposed to be fast. just look good. but he swears by it. he has the 4.2 A8. his is fast. he has a bunch of (forget the name) parts on it that probably cost an arm and a leg. its quick though
Yeah, you'd need a little more than a "chip" to get to the 12s in that boat.. Have a look at it's stock stats..
YEAR/MAKE/0-60/1320
1998 Audi A6 Quattro 8.7 16.6
From..
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Good luck hitting 12s with that!
YEAR/MAKE/0-60/1320
1998 Audi A6 Quattro 8.7 16.6
From..
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
Good luck hitting 12s with that!
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Well, you know that's not true. Low 12s on something that heavy that doesn't even run 13s stock? Chips do great things on turbo'd audis, but to hit low 12s, he'd need around 400whp.
Trending Topics
If you do a google search you'll find that they have shaved a bit of time off the 98 I mentioned, but not enough to make a real difference. It's official 0-60 is still just over 6.0 seconds!!
Nice car.. but not fast/quick.
Nice car.. but not fast/quick.
Originally Posted by lookEVO
oh ok. and you didnt say what year. i dont know if that makes a difference. his is a 2004 but either way, its a sweet car. I would drive it.
No F***ing way a 2.7T can run low 12's with a flash. I recently traded in my A6 4.2 quattro for the EVO MR and have no regrets. That thing was slow, heavy, felt like a bloated whale. Sure, it was luxurious, great highway cruiser, looked fantastic, and was more upscale but it was so boring to drive. In my opinion, Audi's are not great examples of sports sedans even though they are touted as being such. Even the new S4 isn't that fast for the price you pay. I will never buy an Audi again.
Here's where I raise the BS flag and back it up with a link..
http://cars.about.com/cs/testdrives/fr/audia627_t.htm
Thank you, drive through.
http://cars.about.com/cs/testdrives/fr/audia627_t.htm
Audi claims a 0-60 mph time of six seconds flat
Originally Posted by atlvalet
The time for that Audi A6 is not for the 2.7t. My dad used to have one, and while it's not that fast it certainly isn't that slow.
Evolving Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: Maple Shade NJ - All ur base r belong to us
Originally Posted by Kordwood
Kind of like the 1.8Ts. Slow as crap but you get owners who think they're fast because it has a turbo. Power to weight ratio is poor on a lot of the Audi's. I had a friend who chipped one and it never ran right afterward.
) kept trying to pull away from me from a stop. never happened, as i was able to stay with it every time, although in 3rd it would slowly start to gain, but heck, i was in a 120,000 mile N/A car.
my friend had one too, he traded it in for a diesel jetta to saves on gas money though. A4's r nice cars, but that's like what, same engine as the passat.
Originally Posted by siantjab
Here's where I raise the BS flag and back it up with a link..
http://cars.about.com/cs/testdrives/fr/audia627_t.htm
Thank you, drive through.
http://cars.about.com/cs/testdrives/fr/audia627_t.htm
Thank you, drive through.
What exactly are you saying? That the 16.6 1/4mile time is right? If so, I'd say try again.
Read my quote genious.. 0-60 is ~6 seconds. You will not "chip" a car like that and get 12s.. You also can't really beleive what you said..
It IS, very slow, and we ARE talking about the 2.7t.
Move on.
What exactly are you saying? That the 16.6 1/4mile time is right? If so, I'd say try again.
The time for that Audi A6 is not for the 2.7t. My dad used to have one, and while it's not that fast it certainly isn't that slow.
Move on.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
What exactly are you saying? That the 16.6 1/4mile time is right? If so, I'd say try again.


