Yea I know that this may be stupid but I was curious about what the engine in the Evolution VIII/IX makes(horsepower/torque) before or without the turbo...If anyone has an idea or knows where I can find out please post it...

~Merc~

 

465 awhp / 486 awtq. the turbo makes the car smog legal

 

I think the closest thing you'll find is that the na 2.0 4g63 put out 135 rated hp in the 90-94 eclipse / talon / laser. source: http://members.shaw.ca/costall/1000Q/

why would you ever need this information?

all 'evolutions' have had turbos.

 

Well, I was wondering what the motor actually made before mitsu jammed ~20psi of boost into it...

 

I was actually wondering the same thing as I came across this post. Thx for the info

 

Oh really, sure that makes since(not) and I guess that the intake filter is to clean the air around the car and put out pure oxygen to help all the little animals that dont turn into road kill breathe I was just curious about the evo thats all but thanks for the sarcasm

 

My guess would be around 170-190 HP & TQ to the flywheel

 

Less then that due to the low compression pistons used for forced induction. It would probably be a dog as is with no turbo as it sits.

 

You might be able to do a coarse estimation using the fraction of pressure that the NA engine would see, since this would be a rough estimate of the fraction of air... 286hp*14.7psi/(14.7psi+20.0psi) ~ 120hp

 

I can see the next question coming on EVOM....what kind of hp would I get if I removed the turbo and had the engine built for high compression would the car be more reliable?

Sorry just having fun

 

in a word.. no. at least not if you want any significant power out of it. If you want N/A power with minimal displacement, look to honda.

 

I don't know if anyone remembers the Cordia, 2 door hatchback. This was my first Mitsu. I think it had the 4g63 engine in it. I know it was a 2.0 liter. The N/A engine had 88 HP. Not sure what the turbo version had.

 

a mitsu engine without a turbo = weak

 

Thanks for the info I already know...I was just having fun, and hence wrote that to help pick up the sarcasim of the post....Wasnt actually looking for an answer

 

wtf where the hell did you get that idea....since when does a turbo make a car less powerful?