Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

J.D. Power and Associates Reports:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #16  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by EVOTEXAS
You misunderstood. Please devise and implement a more accurate assesment of the market than JD Power has done. I do not need a longer paragraph explaining your idea. I know what your idea is. I read the same book some time ago. However, the world isn't idea(l). It's about money. Are you going to PAY for more accuracy? I didn't think so. JD Power's sample and method of administration is as good as it gets for the amount spent. Marketing isn't cheap and it is also somewhat generic in nature. Let me know your more accurate results when you get them. Thanks.
It seems you missed my initial point. J.D. Powers results are an indication at best.
I'm not sure why you take offense to my opinion, I did not intend to offend.
I simply like to indicate that blindly following these results will NOT necessarily ensure the same owner experience as the survey indicates.
To answer your question about surveys that might more accurately represent owner experience, the German Auto Club (ADAC - TUV), which has 15 million members, has devised an interesting approach. Since it is in German, I'll quickly explain it here:

Total members for each brand and each model.
Total number of service calls received for each brand and model by members in a year. The service calls are then separated into problem categories (engine, tranny, electrical, etc.)

Here's the site, it's subscription unfortunately.
http://www.adac.de/Auto_Motorrad/pan...geID=69904%230

This focuses primarily on mechanical quality and reliability and ignores fit & finish issues.

BTW, as a consumer I don't have to pay for what J.D. Powers does.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 08:40 AM
  #17  
Kordwood's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Vestal, NY
These studies are flawed. Dependability results include silly items like rattling noises or other minor things that only the most **** would notice.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 08:55 AM
  #18  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by evomk8
It seems you missed my initial point. J.D. Powers results are an indication at best.
I'm not sure why you take offense to my opinion, I did not intend to offend.
I simply like to indicate that blindly following these results will NOT necessarily ensure the same owner experience as the survey indicates.
To answer your question about surveys that might more accurately represent owner experience, the German Auto Club (ADAC - TUV), which has 15 million members, has devised an interesting approach. Since it is in German, I'll quickly explain it here:

Total members for each brand and each model.
Total number of service calls received for each brand and model by members in a year. The service calls are then separated into problem categories (engine, tranny, electrical, etc.)

Here's the site, it's subscription unfortunately.
http://www.adac.de/Auto_Motorrad/pan...geID=69904%230

This focuses primarily on mechanical quality and reliability and ignores fit & finish issues.

BTW, as a consumer I don't have to pay for what J.D. Powers does.

I am not saying as a consumer you should pay for what they do. I am saying that in order to become more "accurate" JD Powers will. When the improvement will be marginal for the amount spent, the amount will not be spent. You're missing my point. I am asking you to put yourself in their shoes. No offense taken, just trying to have a reasonable conversation.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 09:39 AM
  #19  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
I am thoroughly enjoying this conversation by the way and am glad I did not offend.
I understand that as a business, J.D. Power is here to provide a service and make money (which they do via automakers). I am not discounting their legitimacy, nor their procedures.
I do research and deal with the difficulties of getting accurate data on a near daily basis.
As a consumer (I'd like to think of myself as a well-researched consumer... ), however, I like to caution about putting too much emphasis on ratings obtained via survey response. Most consumers are not aware of the limitations of this type of research.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 11:24 AM
  #20  
EVOTEXAS's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,111
Likes: 2
From: Texas
Originally Posted by evomk8
I am thoroughly enjoying this conversation by the way and am glad I did not offend.
I understand that as a business, J.D. Power is here to provide a service and make money (which they do via automakers). I am not discounting their legitimacy, nor their procedures.
I do research and deal with the difficulties of getting accurate data on a near daily basis.
As a consumer (I'd like to think of myself as a well-researched consumer... ), however, I like to caution about putting too much emphasis on ratings obtained via survey response. Most consumers are not aware of the limitations of this type of research.

Well, then we mostly agree. I just think that it would be wise for any consumer to take any report, advertisement, rating, etc. etc. etc. with a few grains of salt. We agree on that much I know. Take care.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AboodsEvo
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
8
Nov 22, 2010 07:34 PM
nukblazi
Mid-Atlantic Region
5
Aug 8, 2008 03:30 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:46 AM.