![]() |
Got Dyno'd! with dynosheet!
Got my MR on the dyno for the first time just to see where I was at and have a baseline to go from. I do not know correction factors ect. but I do know it is a corrected number on an all wheel dyno at Precision Dyno Tuning. I took my car there on saturday for the holiday dyno day and couldn't be happier. They are a great bunch of guys and would reccomend them to anyone.
I came out with 295WHP and 298TQ. I was not expecting such a high number to be honest. I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. My mod list is as follows. 1. Agency Power Cat Back 2. UR 2.5 inch test pipe 3. Dynoflash mail in Thats all! 1st run http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d4...r/PC180020.jpg 2nd run http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d4...r/PC180019.jpg |
Thats a beast!
|
OMG THATS REALLY HOT..I MUST GET AN EVO9 MR....
I GOT 12.5 AND 110mph with my 03 evo with cam, methanol kit .running(25psi) and ported manifold o2 housing, and turbin housing.....etc...u name it i did it all except stock turbo.... this is amazing # on mustang dyno~! |
That's one high reading mustang dyno.
|
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno Sergio dyno'd just about the same at PD (305whp/296wtq), but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. What do you think? |
Originally Posted by yesevo
OMG THATS REALLY HOT..I MUST GET AN EVO9 MR....
|
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Hey, Petey, those definitely are surprising numbers. I can't seem to reconcile them with these results, though:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...highlight=dyno Sergio dyno'd just about the same, but trapped 114.8 on 93oct. |
Originally Posted by razorlab
Well he did say these are correct numbers...
|
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Corrected numbers? Yes, maybe, but Sergio's were also SAE corrected. I listed the uncorrected numbers. Sergio's SAE corrected numbers were 300whp/290wtq. Still right in the same ballpark, which is strange for a 6-7mph difference in trap speed.
|
What are you guys talking about, his 108 trap was without the cat back.
"I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. " |
WOW! Congrats, those are insane numbers! You should be proud that you have a factory monstor ;)
|
Originally Posted by IEXCELR8
What are you guys talking about, his 108 trap was without the cat back.
"I have ran 12.6@108 with the same setup minus the cat back. After installing the cat back the car seems to have gotten more of a top end. " |
how did u brake-in ur engine??? for the first 20miles? easy or hard?
|
noob question...
are dyno pulls always done in 3rd gear or does it vary. I know they can't do 1st and 2nd gear pulls due to slippage, j/w if its only 3rd? |
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
That's no more than 10-15whp. He already had a test pipe, which gives the biggest gain in the exhaust. He might trap 109-110 now, but not 114+.
You may be right. He may not have had the TP on either.We will see when hits the track. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:57 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands