Retired navy guy spray painted my evo (caught during the act) pics & vids
Dec 7, 2011, 06:41 PM
#286
Newbie
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Anywhere but here :)
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this video is better and it explains the legal system very well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g3aMkIsCyM
sue everybody!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_g3aMkIsCyM
sue everybody!!!
Dec 7, 2011, 06:41 PM
#287
Newbie
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
whoa - wait as sec. the OP said that the perpetrator grabbed him, spit on him, and you saw what he did to his car. The perpetrator is alive, just beat up - he may want to press charges, but NOTHING will happen, as it is clear that he precipitated the whole incident. The perpetrator charging the OP does not pass the laugh test or the smell test.
Dec 7, 2011, 06:43 PM
#288
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dec 7, 2011, 06:45 PM
#291
Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have got to be kidding. In NONE of the cases I studied did ANYONE intend to KILL the person. But it happened. The point is YOU NEVER KNOW what is going to happen UNTIL IT HAPPENS. So you should exercise restraint when it comes to violently harming someone, and only harm someone to the extent that OP did if it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. In OP's case, it was definitely not. Which is why he will eventually be sued/charged.. And he would have gone to prison for negligent homicide/manslaughter if something life threatening would have happened to the vandalizer. Because the force he exuded was NOT necessary.
1. The vet was damaging private property when he was confronted. (vandalism/ hate crime)
2. After being confronted the vet called the owner racial slurs. (all a hate crime)
3. The vet then spit on the owner and pushed him. (assault)
4. At that point the driver attempted to protect himself and broke the vet's nose. (self defense)
5. The vet tried to flee the scene of a crime and the driver stopped him from operating a vehicle by closing the door on him and broke his leg. The driver did not know if he was going for a weapon in the car and was protecting himself. (Self defense)
6. After the vet was under control, no more damage was done to him and there were no direct threats made to him and the police were called.
You think the Vet is going to win? Im sorry if im missing something, but can you explain how the vet would even be able to justifiably charge the driver?
Dec 7, 2011, 06:46 PM
#293
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ft Riley, Kansas/Tampa, FL
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll keep an eye out on major media companies to put this out to every lawyer in the country. You probably just made that WELL DESERVED UNITED STATES VETERAN A very wealthy man. Good job Mr. "Cage Fighter".
Dec 7, 2011, 06:53 PM
#299
Ok, lets get this straight:
1. The vet was damaging private property when he was confronted. (vandalism/ hate crime)
2. After being confronted the vet called the owner racial slurs. (all a hate crime)
3. The vet then spit on the owner and pushed him. (assault)
4. At that point the driver attempted to protect himself and broke the vet's nose. (self defense)
5. The vet tried to flee the scene of a crime and the driver stopped him from operating a vehicle by closing the door on him and broke his leg. The driver did not know if he was going for a weapon in the car and was protecting himself. (Self defense)
6. After the vet was under control, no more damage was done to him and there were no direct threats made to him and the police were called.
You think the Vet is going to win? Im sorry if im missing something, but can you explain how the vet would even be able to justifiably charge the driver?
1. The vet was damaging private property when he was confronted. (vandalism/ hate crime)
2. After being confronted the vet called the owner racial slurs. (all a hate crime)
3. The vet then spit on the owner and pushed him. (assault)
4. At that point the driver attempted to protect himself and broke the vet's nose. (self defense)
5. The vet tried to flee the scene of a crime and the driver stopped him from operating a vehicle by closing the door on him and broke his leg. The driver did not know if he was going for a weapon in the car and was protecting himself. (Self defense)
6. After the vet was under control, no more damage was done to him and there were no direct threats made to him and the police were called.
You think the Vet is going to win? Im sorry if im missing something, but can you explain how the vet would even be able to justifiably charge the driver?
