Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Wavetrac vs 1-way vs 1.5 way front diff experiences?

Old Jul 5, 2017, 11:33 AM
  #16  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
IIRC, Dallas J runs an Mfactory clutch front diff with good results in his SM autocross car.
Old Jul 5, 2017, 11:37 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
griceiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 1,571
Received 65 Likes on 52 Posts
the carbon pucks under the helical gears (6 of them) are not the problem. The wavetrac works fine if you have traction available on the inside tire. Its ability to lock when one tire has minimal traction is very limited relative to a clutch type diff. It's just the reality of comparing a single friction surface of ~1.5" diameter to 8+ friction surfaces of ~4" diameter.

The wavetrac is an extremely well designed and built unit that is much stronger than the factory torsen, but it is not the highest performing option available.
The following users liked this post:
alpinaturbo (Jul 5, 2017)
Old Jul 5, 2017, 11:55 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
griceiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 1,571
Received 65 Likes on 52 Posts
I've tried front clutch diffs from cusco, ATS, and carbonetic (plus a pre-production unit from OSGiken but since nobody can buy it yet it's sort of irrelevant). I think reliability of the cusco and ATS are good. The carbonetic exploded spider gears, apparently sintered metal vs the forged version found in the ATS. Even though carbonetic was really just marketing alias for the ATS diffs the carbonetic diffs never got the upgraded spider gears.

The downside of the clutch diffs is they eventually wear out and the preload decreases (edit: and they're really expensive). Street driving them will accelerate the wear. If I were street driving I would choose the wavetrac.

Last edited by griceiv; Jul 5, 2017 at 12:01 PM.
The following users liked this post:
alpinaturbo (Jul 5, 2017)
Old Jul 5, 2017, 07:05 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
alpinaturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 790
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
Griceiv

Do you mostly track or AX, please?

I know several winning Time Attack competitors from Europe who compete in extreme class with 700-800bhp 2300-2500lb developed Evo's, using Wavetrac.

So now that for first time I looked at the friction pads, 1.5" dia disc holder, I am reasoning through if on track where we avoid curbs (damage & driving off-line), if Wavetrac is still valid solution compared to Cusco 450F 1-way?

The EU competitors often drive in rainy conditions with challgingly modest traction even with 4WD and Wets.

Perhaps as long as wheel/tire (inside) touches ground there is enough reactive force to allow Wavetrac to hook up both front wheels enough to guarantee plehty of traction.

It's 4WD car so each wheel puts down 1/4 total torque.

It seems that for track oriented cat Cusco equivalent is best default solution.
For mostly street car Wavetrac for sure.

Griceiv,

How did the Cusco work - managing traction and understeer?
Old Jul 5, 2017, 08:03 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
griceiv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 1,571
Received 65 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by alpinaturbo
Griceiv

Do you mostly track or AX, please?
Autox.

I don't have much experience with track driving, but I believe the locking performance expectation of the diff goes down in higher gears because there is less torque that needs to be put down. I would imagine a wavetrac works just fine on a road course.
The following users liked this post:
alpinaturbo (Jul 5, 2017)
Old Jul 6, 2017, 09:23 AM
  #21  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by griceiv
Autox.

I don't have much experience with track driving, but I believe the locking performance expectation of the diff goes down in higher gears because there is less torque that needs to be put down. I would imagine a wavetrac works just fine on a road course.
Even in tighter 2nd gear corners on a track, they're never as tight as autocross, so with less steering input, there is less dynamic camber, and there is more available traction for acceleration.
Old Jul 10, 2017, 05:12 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
 
kikiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 2,026
Received 269 Likes on 207 Posts
and to come back to topic.... mrfred mentions weak stock helical front diff... I wasnt aware that it was a problem.... I have seen older front diffs break its bolts but that was due to bolt design.. not diff itself..
Old Jul 10, 2017, 11:52 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
alpinaturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 790
Received 52 Likes on 42 Posts
I'll blatantly blow the horn on behalf of knowledgeable but restrained genius,
You should know that Kikiturbo tunes ACD maps, and optimizes others ACD maps, aside from building all mechanicals, turbo kits, porting, tuning, and more.

So be assured his feedback based on the experience with ACD+AYC "rest of the world" Evo, and USDM Evo models, as well as successful rally Evo's which are a lot like USDM- ACD with RS rear diff.


Getting back to FRONT LSD:

I discussed with couple of highly experienced road race Evo chassis specialists, and both advised that Wavetrac is only front LSD they use, and pointed out how plates (wear) material in Plated Mechanical LSD gets into gearbox oil, and generally mechanical LSD plates require different oil(somewahat opposite requirements) oils not recommended for gearbox.

For race car the oil issue is moderate compromise, but for more club level and dual purpose car, Wavetrac is easier the better choice.
As far as performance, neither felt that Wavetrac gave up any performance to Plated Mechanical LSD on track, or road.

This is theirs point of view, their experience, and preferred method.
Old Jul 10, 2017, 12:00 PM
  #24  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by alpinaturbo
...

Getting back to FRONT LSD:

I discussed with couple of highly experienced road race Evo chassis specialists, and both advised that Wavetrac is only front LSD they use, and pointed out how plates (wear) material in Plated Mechanical LSD gets into gearbox oil, and generally mechanical LSD plates require different oil(somewahat opposite requirements) oils not recommended for gearbox.

....
Ivica, thanks much on this. I had suspected that this would be a problem for plate diffs, and you have just confirmed it.
Old Jul 10, 2017, 12:22 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
kyoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: US
Posts: 10,542
Received 233 Likes on 209 Posts
all ACD-only chatter moved to the ACD Tuning thread https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...t9as-read.html

sorry about that, we steered way off topic. very good info re: how wear material from a clutch plate front diff would get into the gearbox oil. I was wondering earlier if there would be any reason NOT to run a 1-way clutch for the front diff. that would be a huge one for me.
Old Jul 10, 2017, 01:16 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
 
kikiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 2,026
Received 269 Likes on 207 Posts
yes, front diff shares the oil with the box. As fas as oil is concerned, there are appropriate oils with additives for plate diffs, usually having an LS designation at the end. We already use such oil in the ACD. Having said that, one would need to change the gearbox oil more frequently due to oil contamination.
Old Jul 10, 2017, 01:22 PM
  #27  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
The issue with using an LS gear oil for the clutch diff is that the synchro's in the trans do not want an LS oil..
Old Jul 10, 2017, 01:41 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
 
kyoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: US
Posts: 10,542
Received 233 Likes on 209 Posts
i believe in the states we use GL4 in the gearbox (and front diff) and GL5 for t-case, rear diff. I'm assuming then the clutch plate would want GL5, but the additive packages are different, may not be optimal, plus the different wear metals flowing through with the clutch diff
Old Jul 10, 2017, 01:50 PM
  #29  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 812 Likes on 677 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
The issue with using an LS gear oil for the clutch diff is that the synchro's in the trans do not want an LS oil..
The downside of having a transaxle (sharing oil)...
Old Jul 10, 2017, 02:28 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
 
kikiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 2,026
Received 269 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by kyoo
i believe in the states we use GL4 in the gearbox (and front diff) and GL5 for t-case, rear diff. I'm assuming then the clutch plate would want GL5, but the additive packages are different, may not be optimal, plus the different wear metals flowing through with the clutch diff
the ACD clutch plate wants an LS oil, just like the plate diff

the guys on the uk forums who run plate diffs and normal syncho gearbox use IIRC millers GL4/5 LS trans oil with success. I plan on using motul gear 300 LS, that I normally use in the transfer box with ACD.

I agree that it is not optimal, from the wear standpoint, as we need to remember that the plate diffs are usually used in combination with dogboxes.
Having said that, Ralliart just specifies Diaqueen LSD oil for the gearbox with ralliart plate front diff...

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Wavetrac vs 1-way vs 1.5 way front diff experiences?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:06 PM.