Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

17" x 9" +35 on Swifts... 255/45R17, or 265/40R17?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2017, 06:16 AM
  #16  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
MinusPrevious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 7,704
Received 1,384 Likes on 1,317 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
Rolling is not needed with this combo in my experience. Even with +5 mm spacers (giving an effective offset of +30 mm),
Not sure if Im on board w/that opinion. Can this +30 setup do what is in the pic below?

If it cant, then IMO, it does not fit. Not throwing stones, just want to make we are clear on what is considered true, clear fitment w/out any potential of rub


Old Jun 9, 2017, 10:04 AM
  #17  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by True Blue
What suspension are you running? I'm on Swift Spec Rs and Bilstein HDs.
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
Not sure if Im on board w/that opinion. Can this +30 setup do what is in the pic below?

If it cant, then IMO, it does not fit. Not throwing stones, just want to make we are clear on what is considered true, clear fitment w/out any potential of rub

For a while, I was on MR Bilsteins with GTWorx springs with otherwise stock suspension. Front camber was -1.4 deg and rear was -1.2 deg. +35, +32, and +30 mm all worked with no rubbing. The GTWorx springs produce a fairly mild drop (<1 inch at the front and maybe 1/2 inch at the rears), so that may have helped with not needing any rolling.

Now I'm on Ohlins R&T along with an offset rear pivot for the front control arms. The offset pivot kicks the front wheels forward and outward slightly. Camber is -1.9 deg at the front and -1.5 deg at the rear. The car is dropped a bit more as well. Probably 1.25" at the front and 1" at the rear compared to stock. Zero rubbing issues with +35 and +32 mm. I have not tried +30 mm, but I think it wouldn't rub either.

I have not ever tried checking clearance with springs or shocks removed, but I'm on very light spring rates with the R&Ts (7 kg/mm at all corners) and I routinely transport my family of four around town and have never had any rubbing issues at all.

Keep in mind the fact that I'm running ASUHP that do run a bit more narrow than max performance tires. I could imagine that a max performance 255 could require +35 mm offset to clear the fenders (and would probably just barely clear my R&Ts at the front).
Old Jun 9, 2017, 11:43 AM
  #18  
Jp7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Jp7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,641
Received 104 Likes on 79 Posts
Has anyone figured a way to change a coefficient in the ECU to change wheel-diameter (gearing) so that the odometer/speedometer will be correct with modified overall tire diameters?
Old Jun 9, 2017, 12:15 PM
  #19  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by Jp7
Has anyone figured a way to change a coefficient in the ECU to change wheel-diameter (gearing) so that the odometer/speedometer will be correct with modified overall tire diameters?
The ECU does calculate the speed displayed by the speedo.
Old Jun 9, 2017, 02:32 PM
  #20  
Jp7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Jp7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,641
Received 104 Likes on 79 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
The ECU does calculate the speed displayed by the speedo.
So can we reflash it if we change tire outer diameter?
Old Jun 9, 2017, 06:45 PM
  #21  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by Jp7
So can we reflash it if we change tire outer diameter?
Sorry, I meant to say that the ECU does not calculate speed shown by the speedo. The speedo has some independent method.
Old Jun 10, 2017, 04:54 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Astro_Train's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: east coast
Posts: 542
Received 53 Likes on 51 Posts
I currently run Michelin Pilot Super Sports, on 17x9.5 +32 Weds TC105Ns.. these tires run very thin. I wish I would of went with 265/40s. Car is currently on Swift Spec Rs. No rubbing at all. Camber is at -1.8 F, -1.5 rears.

just showing comparison and optional other tire if you wanted to run the wider size you mentioned earlier but on a different tire.

I will lower the car a tad bit more once I get some Fortune Autos later this summer.

pics below to show how thin they run..

Name:  BB4DDA32-38AA-4CD0-998D-533EC72571EF_zps5khficyw.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  147.8 KB

Name:  836AE04C-198F-4CD9-BCCD-1383BB080BD9_zpscvmgfspd.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  188.0 KB

Last edited by Astro_Train; Jun 10, 2017 at 05:00 AM. Reason: added pics
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jay777
For Sale - Wheels / Tires
18
Oct 3, 2016 06:54 PM
Gruppe-S
Evo 'For Sale' Wheels / Tires
8
Jul 30, 2014 02:32 PM
fightex
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
9
Jun 1, 2012 02:08 PM
MitsuJDM
Evo Show / Shine
12
Mar 11, 2008 01:45 PM
evo 8 ya
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
8
Sep 7, 2004 10:45 AM



Quick Reply: 17" x 9" +35 on Swifts... 255/45R17, or 265/40R17?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:42 AM.