Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

PF01 Evo 17x9.5 ET38 anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 26, 2017, 03:53 PM
  #1  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
PF01 Evo 17x9.5 ET35 anyone?

Anyone running these on their Evo? Wondering if they clear the calipers without a spacer.

Note: I had initially listed these wheels as being +38 mm, but they are actually +35 mm.

Last edited by mrfred; Sep 6, 2017 at 07:44 PM.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 08:06 AM
  #2  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Update. I called Enkei, and a 4 mm spacer is needed to clear the front caliper.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 11:16 AM
  #3  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
That's good. You can run a 20mm spacer on that spec wheel and it'll still fit in the front.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 01:06 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
heel2toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,690
Received 126 Likes on 121 Posts
Not sure if its a helpful data point but the NT03's with the same exact specs clear with no spacers needed. I know youre asking specifically about the PF01 and of course the spoke designs are different but if youre after a specific width and offset without needing spacers that would be my vote.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 01:27 PM
  #5  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
That's good. You can run a 20mm spacer on that spec wheel and it'll still fit in the front.
With or without a fender roll?
Old Sep 6, 2017, 01:36 PM
  #6  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
With or without a fender roll?
In the front, no.
In the rear, I'm sure it'll fit without a spacer. But still may need a fender roll.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 02:42 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
heel2toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,690
Received 126 Likes on 121 Posts
^Correct, front will have plenty of room and the rear with a 255/40 should fit no problem without a roll but anything meatier than that will require a roll. I will admit however that with a 17x9.5 +38 in the rear the rim will actually make some contact and self clearance the trailing arm. I didn't know this at first but one day noticed an interesting find on my trailing arms and upon further inspection of the wheel it was clear what had happened.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 03:58 PM
  #8  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by heel2toe
^Correct, front will have plenty of room and the rear with a 255/40 should fit no problem without a roll but anything meatier than that will require a roll. I will admit however that with a 17x9.5 +38 in the rear the rim will actually make some contact and self clearance the trailing arm. I didn't know this at first but one day noticed an interesting find on my trailing arms and upon further inspection of the wheel it was clear what had happened.
These are +35, so maybe they will clear the rear trailing arm with spacers.

Are you guys saying that at the front, a 17x9.5" +31 mm offset with a 255/40-17 will clear without a fender roll? It looks to me like it should work, but curious what you guys think.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 06:36 PM
  #9  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 812 Likes on 677 Posts
Crap.. I was considering the PF because I thought they didn't' need a spacer.

Originally Posted by heel2toe
^Correct, front will have plenty of room and the rear with a 255/40 should fit no problem without a roll but anything meatier than that will require a roll. I will admit however that with a 17x9.5 +38 in the rear the rim will actually make some contact and self clearance the trailing arm. I didn't know this at first but one day noticed an interesting find on my trailing arms and upon further inspection of the wheel it was clear what had happened.
My RPFs did the same. Not a biggie. Sounds like the NT-03 is the way to go. Ugly in that size/offset, but I don't mind.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 07:43 PM
  #10  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by kaj
Crap.. I was considering the PF because I thought they didn't' need a spacer.



My RPFs did the same. Not a biggie. Sounds like the NT-03 is the way to go. Ugly in that size/offset, but I don't mind.
PF01SS in 17x9" +35 mm does not require a spacer, but its only 9" wide. The 17x9.5" +35 mm PF01 Evo only requires a 4 mm spacer, so its a pretty minor addition.
Old Sep 6, 2017, 10:34 PM
  #11  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (2)
 
Ayoustin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Detroit
Posts: 2,894
Received 573 Likes on 431 Posts
I've got a set of 17x9.5 +38 NT03 and can confirm they clear the calipers without spacers.

Actually selling them if anyone is interested: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sa...m-w-tires.html
Old Sep 7, 2017, 07:59 AM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
heel2toe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,690
Received 126 Likes on 121 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
These are +35, so maybe they will clear the rear trailing arm with spacers.

Are you guys saying that at the front, a 17x9.5" +31 mm offset with a 255/40-17 will clear without a fender roll? It looks to me like it should work, but curious what you guys think.
I see you now changed the offset of the wheels but that should as you mentioned help your case in the rear. Honestly I never bothered with a spacer bc after it happened the first time around it fixed itself so it was never an issue. As for the front you'd be surprised how much wheel and tire you can fit. Now of course ride height and camber both will come into play so its hard to compare apples to apples but a 9.5+31 is well within the range of what will work.

Rolling the fronts are actually really tricky to do properly. The rear quarters are steel and are very easy but the fronts being aluminum are extremely brittle and love to crack. I ruined my fenders up front attempting to roll them right as I was finishing up they cracked so I ended up just spacing them out Evodave style.

But once again if youre only going with a 255 on a 9.5" wheel youll be perfectly fine fitting those. Pretty sure they are many folks running an effective +18 offset up front with no issues.
Originally Posted by kaj
Crap.. I was considering the PF because I thought they didn't' need a spacer.



My RPFs did the same. Not a biggie. Sounds like the NT-03 is the way to go. Ugly in that size/offset, but I don't mind.
They're great wheels and are stronger than RPF1's so while they do give up in the weight department Id prefer to have a strong wheel that is still pretty light. As for aesthetics, I have a set of 17x9.5 +38 as well as 18x10.5 +30 NT03s and while I will admit that my 18's look better, the 17's in person do still look good.
Old Sep 7, 2017, 09:57 AM
  #13  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
I run 17x10 +18 with a 255/40r17 NT01 in the front, no rub at 3* of camber. Well, a little bit on the fender liner, but not the fender. Narrower wheel + a narrower street tire + higher offset = will fit fine. Hell, I even run the 18x9.5 +35's and 265/35r18's in my sig with the same 20mm spacer up front and same alignment, doesn't rub.


Pretty much all the fitment issues with these cars arise in the rear, especially when you're only trying to run a 255 or 265 width tire.
Old Sep 7, 2017, 12:55 PM
  #14  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
I run 17x10 +18 with a 255/40r17 NT01 in the front, no rub at 3* of camber. Well, a little bit on the fender liner, but not the fender. Narrower wheel + a narrower street tire + higher offset = will fit fine. Hell, I even run the 18x9.5 +35's and 265/35r18's in my sig with the same 20mm spacer up front and same alignment, doesn't rub.


Pretty much all the fitment issues with these cars arise in the rear, especially when you're only trying to run a 255 or 265 width tire.
Cool. Sounds like the PF01 Evo is a nice viable choice for a 17x9.5" wheel.
Old Sep 7, 2017, 01:19 PM
  #15  
Newbie
 
NewEvoGuyInFL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone have any pictures installed with side angle shots?


Quick Reply: PF01 Evo 17x9.5 ET38 anyone?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:42 PM.