Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

How much better are quality coilovers for ride comfort really?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2019, 08:45 AM
  #31  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
MinusPrevious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 7,704
Received 1,384 Likes on 1,317 Posts
Originally Posted by Fox_IX
But that requires quite an investment from whomever does the test, I'm not surprised no such tests and exist and I'm definitely not holding my breath. If people want to start sending me shocks I'll happily drive up to PSI or Works in Sonoma and post dyno plots :P
You know how much some of these YT'rs make??? ($$$$)

That Engineering guy could easily buy 1 C/or from the top suppliers & have an outside shock Dyno tuner compare the guts (valves, shims, seals, shafts etc) & then do a Dyno shootout showing the characteristics of each (understanding the basics a shock dyno plot is not that diff)
Old Mar 22, 2019, 09:19 AM
  #32  
Evolved Member
 
kikiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 2,026
Received 269 Likes on 207 Posts
There is one more thing no one mentions and that is the choice of springs.
You can not talk about ride comfort and at the same time run double OE spring rate, lowered car and somewhat smaller bump travel.

To touch on the OP initial question, Ohlins is amazingly comfortable for what it is (relatively stiffly sprung coilover) but under 20-30 mph you can feel the spring stiffness if your roads have potholes and are not smooth. At some speed it deals with bad surfaces quite well even though it doesnt have too much travel. On the other hand, if you drive on track a lot, Ohlins spring rates are on the softer side of what you need... One thing is certain, it is much better than stock damper with lowering spring, and really is the next step from stock bilsteins.. AST is another good option, especially if you do not want to go too low... as they have lots of travel..

On the other had I have had the pleasure of driving with some high spec rally dampers made for bumpy tarmac and mix tarmac/gravel, and those run stock-ish MR spring rates (so quite soft really), but still provide surprising body control, incredible turn in and can do so while you do 100 mph on potholes... Oh yeah, they cost 4x as much as ohlins..
Old Mar 22, 2019, 09:59 AM
  #33  
EvoM Community Team Leader
 
Biggiesacks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 5,688
Received 704 Likes on 592 Posts
there is also machining/build quality, materials quality, engineering quality, serviceability, availability of parts, manufacturer support, warranty. I don't think a shock dyno would necessarily tell you any of those things. You might have brand new shocks that perform a certain way but then you put 10k miles on them and not so much the case anymore. Different qualities will be important to you based on your use case as well. IMO the best kind of info is from people who have experience with the product your looking at and are using it like you plan to use it.
Old Mar 22, 2019, 10:55 AM
  #34  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (4)
 
Construct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,661
Received 143 Likes on 119 Posts
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
You know how much some of these YT'rs make??? ($$$$)

That Engineering guy could easily buy 1 C/or from the top suppliers & have an outside shock Dyno tuner compare the guts (valves, shims, seals, shafts etc) & then do a Dyno shootout showing the characteristics of each (understanding the basics a shock dyno plot is not that diff)
Most shock dyno plots shared online are peak velocity plots. Those plots only tell a small part of the story. It's a bit like looking at a 4th gear engine dyno when you really want to know about the turbo transient response from 5000RPM tip-in in 2nd gear on an autocross course. In both cases you can get a general idea from the graphs, but the real-world transient performance can still range from great to terrible for a given dyno plot.

Continuous shock velocity plots can show more of the picture, including hysteresis. When you look at a simplified peak velocity plot you're only seeing just that: The peak damping force for a given velocity. In the real-world, the damping force for a given velocity will be different if the shock is accelerating or decelerating, for example. Bad shocks might have a great-looking peak velocity plot, but in real world transient conditions the low-speed damping might be all over the place due to hysteresis.

KevinD posted some interesting shock data collection a few years ago: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/mo...ta-thread.html One of the most interesting graphs in that post is the histogram of shock velocities in a straight line. The x-axis on that chart is from -0.2 to 0.2 in/sec, but it looks like most of the activity is constrained to +/- 0.1 in/sec or less. Now compare that to the x-axis of a typical shock PVP dyno plot, which commonly ranges from 0 to 10.0 in/sec. The straight-line shock velocities rarely exceed the first 1% of the shock dyno plot. I think the PVP shock dynos are useful for seeing how the car will settle in big transitions and how it will absorb big bumps, but to be honest I don't actually know how well that correlates to what people are talking about when they say "ride quality".
Old Mar 22, 2019, 11:18 AM
  #35  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
MinusPrevious's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 7,704
Received 1,384 Likes on 1,317 Posts
^^^Well said

Ive been YT'ng a bit & learning a bit about shock dynos & all the diff parameters that can be measured.

Even our popular Fort Auto guys have a beginners guide on CVP vs PVP here: https://fortune-auto.com/shock-dyno-basics/

The " brand X coilover is so much better than Y coilover" just doesnt do a lot for me anymore

Old Mar 22, 2019, 12:00 PM
  #36  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,755
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by kaj
Ooh, yeah. Found them there for $2,400. Not too far off from my current coilover, so definitely in my price range, in the near future. If I can get $900-1000 for mine, that would make it so much easier
You have to call/email them for a quote. Their website lists retail pricing and doesn't reflect the discount they put on quotes.

Originally Posted by Construct
6K/8K for a street setup is not a bad idea if you want to go all-in on comfort. In the past, Performance Shock would revalve for free if you bought the coils and springs from them.
Revelves aren't "free" exactly. They give you less of a discount on the coilovers if you want them revalved. Still ends up less than retail price though.

Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
Said it before but will say it again
How can any of us objectively compare one brand vs another w/out examining the Dyno plots?
I can only imagine how enlightening it would be to see a real, non bias, Dyno plot test comparing the all the big hitters (Moton/ Ohlins / AST / Stance / Feal / FA / etc, etc, etc)
Ill continue searching, but have not found any YT Vids tackling this type of comparison
Because I've driven Evo's with 10 different coilovers on them on the same roads multiple times, for the price Ohlins c a n n o t be beaten. Dyno plots don't tell you a whole lot, especially so when most people don't know what they're looking.

Originally Posted by kikiturbo
There is one more thing no one mentions and that is the choice of springs.
You can not talk about ride comfort and at the same time run double OE spring rate, lowered car and somewhat smaller bump travel.

To touch on the OP initial question, Ohlins is amazingly comfortable for what it is (relatively stiffly sprung coilover) but under 20-30 mph you can feel the spring stiffness if your roads have potholes and are not smooth. At some speed it deals with bad surfaces quite well even though it doesnt have too much travel. On the other hand, if you drive on track a lot, Ohlins spring rates are on the softer side of what you need... One thing is certain, it is much better than stock damper with lowering spring, and really is the next step from stock bilsteins.. AST is another good option, especially if you do not want to go too low... as they have lots of travel..

On the other had I have had the pleasure of driving with some high spec rally dampers made for bumpy tarmac and mix tarmac/gravel, and those run stock-ish MR spring rates (so quite soft really), but still provide surprising body control, incredible turn in and can do so while you do 100 mph on potholes... Oh yeah, they cost 4x as much as ohlins..
I've never driven anything that makes potholes feel smooth at 25mph that wasn't my offroad truck.

Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
^^^Well said

Ive been YT'ng a bit & learning a bit about shock dynos & all the diff parameters that can be measured.

Even our popular Fort Auto guys have a beginners guide on CVP vs PVP here: https://fortune-auto.com/shock-dyno-basics/

The " brand X coilover is so much better than Y coilover" just doesnt do a lot for me anymore

Having driven two Evo's with Fortune auto's, two Evo's with Ohlins and knowing two guys that went from FA to Ohlins- I can matter of factly say that Ohlin's do a better job.

My statements on Ohlins being the best option for the money is not anecdotal "I bought these coilovers (and have never driven anything else) and they're the ****ing best. I've driven brand O, X, Y, and Z; on track, on good roads, on bad roads, on twisty back roads, you name it. Brand Ohlins is where its at for $2k.
Old Mar 22, 2019, 07:40 PM
  #37  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Name User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 371
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
I was thinking of ordering the Ohlins combo from Vorschlag with the camber/caster plates, but then I'm reading that will move the wheels and possibly add to the already catastrophic rubbing/lock I'll be dealing with on 285s. This means I could then use the whiteline caster correction kit to recenter the wheels in the wells a bit, is that correct? That's like $700 for some caster. Hooo boy this messageboard and this ******* car, I swear.

Right now on 8/9k KW V3s, if I dial in stiffer settings the car gets pretty scary, bouncy and nervous on faster sweeping turns. Stock sway bar I think. Car is like 80% daily 15% autocross 5% track, so I'm probably sticking to no more than 8/10k.
Old Mar 22, 2019, 08:56 PM
  #38  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 812 Likes on 677 Posts
Originally Posted by Name User
I was thinking of ordering the Ohlins combo from Vorschlag with the camber/caster plates, but then I'm reading that will move the wheels and possibly add to the already catastrophic rubbing/lock I'll be dealing with on 285s. This means I could then use the whiteline caster correction kit to recenter the wheels in the wells a bit, is that correct? That's like $700 for some caster. Hooo boy this messageboard and this ******* car, I swear.

Right now on 8/9k KW V3s, if I dial in stiffer settings the car gets pretty scary, bouncy and nervous on faster sweeping turns. Stock sway bar I think. Car is like 80% daily 15% autocross 5% track, so I'm probably sticking to no more than 8/10k.
Going the other way, I have PSRS and Vorshlag plates. The plates made hardly any difference in how far forward my wheel is. A few mm at the camber plate translates to very little movement of the wheel. I rub a LOT on the front fender liners with a 255 tire on a +18 wheel. It's really bad. I can't imagine the plates causing much problem by themselves, but I really don't now your clearances. Are you that close to rubbing stuff? Adding offset bushings to the control arm will absolutely correct movement from the plates, and then some.

As for your V3s, it just sounds like you could use some tuning. Without knowing the details, maybe more rebound damping?
Old Mar 22, 2019, 10:37 PM
  #39  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Dallas J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,805
Received 724 Likes on 566 Posts
Depending a bit on some of the variable, but the wheel moves about 1:3 with the top hat off the top of my head. Will have to double check my CAD to verify the spacing from ball joint to hub and hub to strut top. So my caster plates for the ohilins moving the top back 20mm will give about 1.65deg caster and move the wheel back about 7mm. That can be a lot of you are already rubbing or close to it.

The offset bushing in the control arm is great for pushing the wheel forward and adding another ~1-1.5deg of caster depending whos version you have but the major downside is the added stiction you get in the inner control arm bushing as it binds against the bolt. If the goal is to leave that bushing normal rubber or urethane and not a spherical, then I would actually leave the strut top and control arm offset bushing out of it. The stiction is just to high.
Old Mar 22, 2019, 11:00 PM
  #40  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 812 Likes on 677 Posts
Originally Posted by Dallas J
Depending a bit on some of the variable, but the wheel moves about 1:3 with the top hat off the top of my head. Will have to double check my CAD to verify the spacing from ball joint to hub and hub to strut top. So my caster plates for the ohilins moving the top back 20mm will give about 1.65deg caster and move the wheel back about 7mm. That can be a lot of you are already rubbing or close to it.

The offset bushing in the control arm is great for pushing the wheel forward and adding another ~1-1.5deg of caster depending whos version you have but the major downside is the added stiction you get in the inner control arm bushing as it binds against the bolt. If the goal is to leave that bushing normal rubber or urethane and not a spherical, then I would actually leave the strut top and control arm offset bushing out of it. The stiction is just to high.
So you would rather do neither?

FWIW, I want to say my caster is really high.. like 7* or more.
Old Mar 23, 2019, 12:29 AM
  #41  
Evolved Member
 
kikiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 2,026
Received 269 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
I've never driven anything that makes potholes feel smooth at 25mph that wasn't my offroad truck.
Ok, pothole might be a bit of a strong word.. But on our broken up tarmac and crossing over the tram rails in the city the car does shake you up a bit up to 20-25 mph... I might be too old for that on a daily bassis..

Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
My statements on Ohlins being the best option for the money is not anecdotal "I bought these coilovers (and have never driven anything else) and they're the ****ing best. I've driven brand O, X, Y, and Z; on track, on good roads, on bad roads, on twisty back roads, you name it. Brand Ohlins is where its at for $2k.
Agree on that 100%. I have installed and used Ohlins on two evo X's, evo 9, and a GTR and for the money it is a great all round combo.





All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:13 PM.