EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)
-   Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-tires-wheels-brakes-suspension-23/)
-   -   What do I need to make rpf 1 18 x 10.5 +15 work? (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/evo-tires-wheels-brakes-suspension/751282-what-do-i-need-make-rpf-1-18-x-10-5-15-work.html)

Womb Raider Oct 11, 2018 02:22 PM

What do I need to make rpf 1 18 x 10.5 +15 work?
 
I just got those sized rims didnt want to have to do anything but later reading people have been having to do modifications. I will be on swift racing springs and bilstein struts. Im on 18 w/ 255 tires and i scrape the liner on hard turns.

Ayoustin Oct 11, 2018 03:44 PM

To make them fit and still have a useful suspension you need aftermarket body panels. The offset is too low for the rear of the car.

MinusPrevious Oct 11, 2018 04:02 PM

Yeah, +15 on a 10.5" is way too proud of the rear fender. Even those running the very popular Voltex over-fender dont run a +15 in the 10.5" IIRC

Steer clear of that spec :cool:

Heres the layout vs what i run (note: my rears are fully worked!). This +15 would poke 1.09" further

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.evo...cf4df57f57.jpg

Womb Raider Oct 11, 2018 04:17 PM

Looks like im gonna have to swap em out for the 18 x 9.5 +15 .

heel2toe Oct 11, 2018 05:40 PM

The +15 is really not a great offset specifically in the rear of our cars. Must it be an RPF1? And are you opposed to running a spacer in the front? Im pretty sure they have a 18x9.5 +38 that would would pretty good but would most likely require around a 20mm spacer possibly a little less, I dont honestly remember bc I dont run RPF1s but I do know the info is posted here somewhere so please take a look or perhaps someone else in the fitment crew can chime in.

My main point was that I would recommend you pursue something with a higher offset.

MinusPrevious Oct 11, 2018 06:14 PM

Eric, Pretty sure your notes the RPF1's are correct. If you dont run the +38, up front, you would have to run the +18 RPF1 & the +38 in the rear, but then you cant rotate

And, for sure, the +15 is not, in any width, good for the EvO rear. Some guys have certainly done it, but they rub & all the troubles that go w/it :crap:

But, on the other side, if your going for the Stance fit-up, the +15 is OK.

Not sure if youre a function > fit type or the other way around

Womb Raider Oct 11, 2018 06:30 PM

So stick with the stock fitment if i dont want any rubbing issues w/ also having springs

MinusPrevious Oct 11, 2018 06:44 PM


Originally Posted by Womb Raider (Post 11843684)
So stick with the stock fitment if i dont want any rubbing issues w/ also having springs

Not necessarily

You have to be willing to modify the rear fenders (rolling 3/4 or a full flat roll, fender pulling, bumper bolt relocation & a few other tricks may be needed)

Womb Raider Oct 13, 2018 11:06 PM

Which size requires the least mods?

MinusPrevious Oct 14, 2018 09:34 AM

No definite answer, but generally speaking IMO

17x9 to 17x9.5 +28 to +35
18x9 to 18x9.5 +28 to +35

Tire size certainly plays a factor

You have to be willing to modify the rear fenders. No way around it!

Womb Raider Oct 14, 2018 02:50 PM

Mod rear fender in what way? Roll and Camber, just roll?

MinusPrevious Oct 14, 2018 03:52 PM

Not sure if Ive ever shared my ride w/you. Visually it looks very tame, in regards to wheel / tire fit but this set-up below required the following rear fender work
  • 3/4 rear fender roll
  • A noticeable rear fender pull just above the rear bumper cover
  • Bumper bolt relocation
  • -1.9 degrees of camber
  • Lower rear bumper cover has been pushed out 1"
W/T spec: 17x9.5 +30 running a wide federal 265/40 tire

Now, imagine running that +15 which pokes 1" further than this. There is no amount of work that could be done to fit those +15's properly

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.evo...b0015a1ce8.jpg

Womb Raider Oct 15, 2018 04:11 PM

Hmm, very well. I guess i'll return these and get a smaller size.

Womb Raider Oct 16, 2018 07:49 PM

Sending them back tomorrow. Does anyone else have any size inputs before I decide to task on a different size.

kaj Oct 16, 2018 08:18 PM


Originally Posted by Womb Raider (Post 11844541)
Sending them back tomorrow. Does anyone else have any size inputs before I decide to task on a different size.

All listed above your post:


Originally Posted by heel2toe (Post 11843681)
Im pretty sure they have a 18x9.5 +38 that would would pretty good.


Originally Posted by MinusPrevious (Post 11843683)
Eric, Pretty sure your notes the RPF1's are correct. If you dont run the +38, up front, you would have to run the +18 RPF1 & the +38 in the rear, but then you cant rotate


Originally Posted by MinusPrevious (Post 11844089)
No definite answer, but generally speaking IMO

17x9 to 17x9.5 +28 to +35
18x9 to 18x9.5 +28 to +35


Originally Posted by MinusPrevious (Post 11844139)
  • 3/4 rear fender roll
  • A noticeable rear fender pull just above the rear bumper cover
  • Bumper bolt relocation
  • -1.9 degrees of camber
  • Lower rear bumper cover has been pushed out 1"
W/T spec: 17x9.5 +30 running a wide federal 265/40 tire

Now, imagine running that +15 which pokes 1" further than this. There is no amount of work that could be done to fit those +15's properly



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:12 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands