Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

15 X GSR GTX3076R Dyno results Whalen Tuned!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2016, 07:21 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
BlueByU2004GSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Peotone, Il
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
15 X GSR GTX3076R Dyno results Whalen Tuned!

You can see my build thread here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/pr...l#post11575834 , but this is the results of the build with an ATP GTX3076R on 93 and e85. I'm overall very pleased with the results and the great experience I had with John and the guys at Whalen's Speed R&D. He is definitely a perfectionist! We hit a limit on e85 because of the FIC 1100's, but we kept some room in the IDC % to stay safe on the stock engine. Here are the results!
Attached Thumbnails 15 X GSR GTX3076R Dyno results Whalen Tuned!-tony-s-iphone-6s-plus-feb16-323.jpg   15 X GSR GTX3076R Dyno results Whalen Tuned!-tony-s-iphone-6s-plus-feb16-324.jpg  
Old Feb 13, 2016, 07:39 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (36)
 
e_kobz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 2,960
Received 98 Likes on 94 Posts
I was originally gonna go with the FIC 1100's for my upcoming build but I decided I wanted a little more head room so I went with ID1300's
Old Feb 13, 2016, 07:53 AM
  #3  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
BlueByU2004GSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Peotone, Il
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by e_kobz
I was originally gonna go with the FIC 1100's for my upcoming build but I decided I wanted a little more head room so I went with ID1300's
These flow well, and I'm still on a stock engine so when I decide to (or if something goes wrong) I will be going with FIC 2150's and a surge tank setup with a bosch 044.
Old Feb 13, 2016, 11:07 PM
  #4  
Newbie
 
aspirollari1994's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Harrisonburg, VA
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueByU2004GSR
You can see my build thread here https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/pr...l#post11575834 , but this is the results of the build with an ATP GTX3076R on 93 and e85. I'm overall very pleased with the results and the great experience I had with John and the guys at Whalen's Speed R&D. He is definitely a perfectionist! We hit a limit on e85 because of the FIC 1100's, but we kept some room in the IDC % to stay safe on the stock engine. Here are the results!
geeeeez... great numbes
Old Feb 14, 2016, 08:25 AM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
BlueByU2004GSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Peotone, Il
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by aspirollari1994
geeeeez... great numbes
Thanks! I'm loving the feel of the car, I can't wait to get it out to the track in spring!
Old Feb 14, 2016, 08:32 PM
  #6  
EvoM Administrator
iTrader: (24)
 
Noize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 8,849
Received 134 Likes on 81 Posts
You have all the ***** in the world revving it that deep. Cut back to just before 7800 and it should last so much longer.
Old Feb 18, 2016, 10:30 PM
  #7  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
JoeyBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How's the low end? Is this beefy enough to the point of not being able to be fully usable for canyon runs with back to back corners over and over again, as in it won't get a chance to spool fully
Old Feb 19, 2016, 08:48 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBoy
How's the low end? Is this beefy enough to the point of not being able to be fully usable for canyon runs with back to back corners over and over again, as in it won't get a chance to spool fully
If you're worried about spool, can you also go with the smaller GTX3071R. There is also the smaller 0.73 A/R (vs. larger 0.94) if you really want better low-end.

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...-Cosworth.aspx
Old Feb 20, 2016, 10:15 AM
  #9  
Newbie
iTrader: (2)
 
JoeyBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spdracerut
If you're worried about spool, can you also go with the smaller GTX3071R. There is also the smaller 0.73 A/R (vs. larger 0.94) if you really want better low-end.

http://www.motoiq.com/MagazineArticl...-Cosworth.aspx
What about like a Cavalli stage 2 or a MHI-18k? What are you personal though on those instead?
Old Feb 26, 2016, 09:38 AM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
BlueByU2004GSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Peotone, Il
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Noize
You have all the ***** in the world revving it that deep. Cut back to just before 7800 and it should last so much longer.
I've usually kept it to about 7-7.5k rpm while making a quick acceleration or pull while I'm out driving it from point A to point B. It's solid advice though, I'll probably still shift just before 7800 rpm like you suggested for longevity sake.
Old Feb 26, 2016, 09:45 AM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
BlueByU2004GSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Peotone, Il
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBoy
How's the low end? Is this beefy enough to the point of not being able to be fully usable for canyon runs with back to back corners over and over again, as in it won't get a chance to spool fully
The GTX3076R has been great, it's been very responsive in every situation that I've put it in so far. I'm in Illinois though so I couldn't speak much on making canyon runs, but going through some corners and twisty roads it's had plenty of get up for me and it doesn't seem to lag as bad as you may be thinking it does. As mentioned there is the GTX3071R option if you want slightly faster spool, however the few hundred rpm quicker spool up time wasn't worth the loss in power (and future potential power) for me. Good luck with whatever path you decide to take! Don't forget that I'm also on a bone stock engine and once the cams are changed and/or if the engine is built into a 2.2L/2.4L stroker it will help with the spool up time of the turbo.
Old Feb 28, 2016, 05:27 PM
  #12  
Newbie
 
Islandboy78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Island
Posts: 11
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Old May 3, 2016, 10:59 AM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Cloud0307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Garland,TX
Posts: 115
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
I have full bolt ons, I do have a HFC and not test pipe, GTX3076, ID1000s and fuel pump. Tuned on 93 and only made 383/356 I don't get it

Nice numbers man
Old May 3, 2016, 05:05 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 2,322
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by Cloud0307
I have full bolt ons, I do have a HFC and not test pipe, GTX3076, ID1000s and fuel pump. Tuned on 93 and only made 383/356 I don't get it

Nice numbers man
Different dyno, different day, different car, you can't compare. Even different tires will change the numbers.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Evo_AK
For Sale - Suspension / Brakes / Handling
5
Jan 12, 2018 05:42 AM
06MREvo
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
47
May 16, 2017 06:40 AM
jnassar89
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Apr 22, 2016 05:06 AM
kkakonn
Evo X Dyno Results
13
Jun 24, 2014 01:53 PM
Doug W
Vendor Announcements
40
Jan 31, 2009 07:40 PM



Quick Reply: 15 X GSR GTX3076R Dyno results Whalen Tuned!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:27 AM.