Evo X MR SST Precision 6870 952/635
2 Attachment(s)
Finally getting around to posting my car up. SAE 933/622 Standard 952/635 Dyno Jet.
Kozmic built 2.2L Manley internals Kelford 214-C Precision 6870 Turbo ETS T4 Twin Scroll Turbo Kit ID 2000s Custom Dodson/Kozmic 14 plate Clutch Pakc Open Source Tune E85-Actual was roughly 76% |
That is huge amount of power for an X (or any car for that matter) to put down. That it is going through the SST is amazing. My hat is off to you and everyone involved in the build.
Do you care to share what it took to get the SST to cope with that amount of power? |
Originally Posted by Cannonballer
(Post 11804610)
That is huge amount of power for an X (or any car for that matter) to put down. That it is going through the SST is amazing. My hat is off to you and everyone involved in the build.
Do you care to share what it took to get the SST to cope with that amount of power? |
|
how long before you let it rip to 8800? what are 6870 and what did the boost curve look like?
|
Originally Posted by BEWST
(Post 11805192)
how long before you let it rip to 8800? what are 6870 and what did the boost curve look like?
Rev limit is set 8600 but the way its tuned currently its optimal shift point is between 7-7500rpm. After some strengthening upgrades we will change it up and rev it out quite a bit more. Not sure on the boost curve. I don't have it on any of the graphs I have and we didn't look at it at the shop while I was there. |
Originally Posted by PDCC_EVO
(Post 11805262)
Rev limit is set 8600 but the way its tuned currently its optimal shift point is between 7-7500rpm. After some strengthening upgrades we will change it up and rev it out quite a bit more. Not sure on the boost curve. I don't have it on any of the graphs I have and we didn't look at it at the shop while I was there.
|
Originally Posted by bewst
(Post 11805564)
i meant to ask what ar the 6870 is.
1.15 |
Originally Posted by PDCC_EVO
(Post 11805581)
1.15
|
Great #’s!
what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0? was fitment if the 6870 any issue? any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR? |
Originally Posted by jake33
(Post 11805858)
Great #’s!
what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0? was fitment if the 6870 any issue? any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR? |
Wow. That's all.
|
Originally Posted by BEWST
(Post 11805670)
Thats good and early power from a 6870. What compression ratio?
Originally Posted by jake33
(Post 11805858)
Great #’s!
what made you guys go with a 2.2 compared to a 2.0? I am not sure on the compression or why he went with a 2.2 as the engine was built by the previous owner and the invoice is just listed as a stage package. The car was originally built for autocross was fitment if the 6870 any issue? There were no fitment issues but its very close to the cam sensor shield. any reason as to why you chose it over the 9180 EFR? |
I see. Why the 1.15 AR and the not the V-band .96? |
Originally Posted by jake33
(Post 11807388)
I see. Why the 1.15 AR and the not the V-band .96? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:54 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands