Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

EcuTek and Z chip compared on the same dyno

Old Nov 30, 2008 | 08:37 PM
  #16  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
We will reiterate:

Unless the tuning was done on the same car with the same mods the whole thread is pointless.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #17  
dcasandman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
^^^Pointless is just a matter of opinion. A lot of people would like to see it. People are smart enough to understand that there will be a 10-20whp difference on different cars with different mods. If you get enough cars you will still start to see trends in each product. Consistencies vs Inconsistencies. Plus there may be positives and negatives that may sway a customer to one side or the other. I think this is far from a worthless thread. To me it very much like comparing 2 different cars STI vs EVO. There are few products now. Lets get them together and see which we like more. Nothing more nothing less. The only down side to this is if one of the sides has something to hide or is scared of coming out and may lose money cause of it. If not I say let everyone have the comparison. Im headed to Cobb in Dallas Dec 13th for an AP tune. Id be more than happy to meet someone with the Z-Chip for a comparison.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #18  
Rguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Va
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
We will reiterate:

Unless the tuning was done on the same car with the same mods the whole thread is pointless.

Im sure that can be done, easily.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 08:49 PM
  #19  
ibarkovic's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
We will reiterate:

Unless the tuning was done on the same car with the same mods the whole thread is pointless.
nobody ever said that they were planning on bring a highly modified ecutek tuned vs a stock zchipped evo. It seems that everytime someone compares your products , you get into like a defensive state, if your chip gives 100whp then you dont have to worry about anything, correct ?.. this "test" will oviously be done with stock for stock. and if better an off the shelf mail in so that ttp cant give more excuses later.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #20  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
We will reiterate:

Unless the tuning was done on the same car with the same mods the whole thread is pointless.
What we are talking about is 2 stock EVO Xs doing the tests, or two Xs with the EXACT same mods. If they both baseline within a couple hp of each other, then there's no reason to say that the test isn't legitimate. Why are you so against this test? Does that strike anyone else as a little odd? If you are confident in your product, then measuring it against the competiton should be no problem.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:06 PM
  #21  
smoothevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 440
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
We will reiterate:

Unless the tuning was done on the same car with the same mods the whole thread is pointless.
As a potential customer you have done nothing but turn me off the zchip with your posts in various threads. It seems like you do everything you can to stop someone from comparing a product to the "zchip". Almost like you are afraid of the results....

Last edited by smoothevo; Nov 30, 2008 at 09:08 PM.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #22  
JDMEvo9RS's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Houston
It is not possible to keep a test like this free from BIAS.

From my experience reading and lurking I have learned that;

1. Rguy is a ecuflash demo tester reflash supporter.

2. dcasandman is a moderator for another forum which is owned by an ecutek tuner. dcasandman also appears to be an ecutek user.

3. ibarkovich has begged TTP-Engineering for a ZChip sponsorship for months and TTP has denied his request for sponsorship. He now sports a signature supporting a competitor shop to TTP whose shopcar is ecutek tuned.

4. Sti2evox is either a current ecutek user or simply is a biased supporter of ecutek from a recent review of his posting history.


With these facts, how could one expect to take to Evo X's to a random dyno and expect there not to be bias one way or another?

Its just not possible and I fully understand what it means to have the same car custom tuned at the same place by qualified, certified tuners of both systems.

Its the only way to be fair, have both sides supported and insured there is no screwery going on.

The likelyhood of this taking place is slim to none.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:26 PM
  #23  
SASD209's Avatar
Admin Alumni
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,721
Likes: 0
From: KCEF
Originally Posted by JDMEvo9RS
It is not possible to keep a test like this free from BIAS.

From my experience reading and lurking I have learned that;

1. Rguy is a ecuflash demo tester reflash supporter.

2. dcasandman is a moderator for another forum which is owned by an ecutek tuner. dcasandman also appears to be an ecutek user.

3. ibarkovich has begged TTP-Engineering for a ZChip sponsorship for months and TTP has denied his request for sponsorship. He now sports a signature supporting a competitor shop to TTP whose shopcar is ecutek tuned.

4. Sti2evox is either a current ecutek user or simply is a biased supporter of ecutek from a recent review of his posting history.


With these facts, how could one expect to take to Evo X's to a random dyno and expect there not to be bias one way or another?

Its just not possible and I fully understand what it means to have the same car custom tuned at the same place by qualified, certified tuners of both systems.

Its the only way to be fair, have both sides supported and insured there is no screwery going on.

The likelyhood of this taking place is slim to none.
5. SASD209 does not have a horse in this race since he doesn't currently own a product. I'd like to see a "3rd party" result, but that's just me.

SASD209
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #24  
NMX's Avatar
NMX
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: US
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
This is a stupid test.

Unless the tuning was done on the same car with the same mods the whole thread is pointless.

You act as if you are doing the newer evom members some kind of favor when you, yourself think that octane alone is the defining factor as to what power can be obtained from tuning an Evo X.

This is far from the truth and making statements such as this as well as slanderous statements that our dyno reads high, only indicates that you are the newbie you describe, lacking an understanding of tuning, dynamometers and how each product works.
Wow, it's posts like these from TTP that have made me decide not to go with the z-chip. I was really excited to hear about the z-chip coming out as a viable piggyback solution, but I've seen more than one post from TTP that just makes me want to stay away. Customer service and professionalism (especially on a public forum) are quite important to me.

To keep this on topic, I think this test would be interesting to see. I bet peak power gains are comparable, but the area under the curves will be interesting to see.

Last edited by NMX; Nov 30, 2008 at 09:36 PM.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #25  
dcasandman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
^^^ I Have no flash on my car. Ive been waiting on a product like AP or Zchip for long time. I planned on unichip or procede, but they went to the waste side. If TTP does good business and proves reliable I have not issue buying one. I don't care what I use I just want results. This test would be great for me. Yes, Im a mod on another Evo X forum. I do it cause I like my Evo. I'm the Mod of News lol so nothing important or technical. Its not like I know anything technical, and have only talked to the admin once when I ordered a boost gauge. I have 0 agenda. I just want to see results.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:32 PM
  #26  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
Originally Posted by JDMEvo9RS
It is not possible to keep a test like this free from BIAS.

From my experience reading and lurking I have learned that;

1. Rguy is a ecuflash demo tester reflash supporter.

2. dcasandman is a moderator for another forum which is owned by an ecutek tuner. dcasandman also appears to be an ecutek user.

3. ibarkovich has begged TTP-Engineering for a ZChip sponsorship for months and TTP has denied his request for sponsorship. He now sports a signature supporting a competitor shop to TTP whose shopcar is ecutek tuned.

4. Sti2evox is either a current ecutek user or simply is a biased supporter of ecutek from a recent review of his posting history.


With these facts, how could one expect to take to Evo X's to a random dyno and expect there not to be bias one way or another?

Its just not possible and I fully understand what it means to have the same car custom tuned at the same place by qualified, certified tuners of both systems.

Its the only way to be fair, have both sides supported and insured there is no screwery going on.

The likelyhood of this taking place is slim to none.
While agreed that there should be some sort of monitoring to ensure that there is no trickery going down, why do feel so threatened by this test? If you're happy with your Z chip then that's all that should matter to you. This test is not meant to bash either product, but rather compare them on the same dyno; nothing more. Oh, and I don't have ecutek or open ecu. I'm bone stock except for a couple of bolt ons. I just prefer reflashes because I like controlling the ecu at the source; it's more precise and usually offers more parameter adjustability. But again, these products both have their spot in the marketplace and suit different user's needs.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #27  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
As I asked before, would current Z chip owners and ecutek owners state the city in which they live in so we could try to arrange a dyno day? Thanks to all who want to participate.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:37 PM
  #28  
Rguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
From: Arlington Va
Ecutek owner in Northern Virginia.
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #29  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
Originally Posted by Rguy
Ecutek owner in Northern Virginia.
Great! Thanks for stepping up. Anyone else?
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 10:00 PM
  #30  
NateDaJew's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: PHILLY
Ecutek Philadelphia Pa.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:58 AM.