Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

AFR calibration map

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 06:15 AM
  #31  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
evox only...
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 08:46 AM
  #32  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by Mojito
does this go instead of the first line of the Tephra code?
Tephra's definitions are the correct ones. He said he was positive it is percent128.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 10:27 PM
  #33  
saytheb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 182
Likes: 2
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by tephra
ok I will post up what I see... see if you guys can think of anything.

in this subroutine which applies the AFR_Calibration to the injector scaling there are coolant AND IAT compensators

there is also a check to see whether this car is SST equiped

the value gets stored in a temporary variable which is then looked up with the AFRMAP variable AND LTFT's
Maybe something like:

if temp(<>=x) and IAT (<>=x) then use AFR_Calibration | if SST apply to ALL?

Can you UNsimplify your simplification?
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2010 | 11:13 PM
  #34  
Mojito's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Originally Posted by Golden
Tephra's definitions are the correct ones. He said he was positive it is percent128.
I thought they were the same tables, only one is in %%, the other is pulsewidth adder?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #35  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
They are the same table. Just the display is different. It's just simpler to say Tephra's definitions are correct.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 12:37 PM
  #36  
Mojito's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
I can't have this table appear in EcuFlash. I copied the code into the Misc section of the xxxx15.xml and evo10base.xml, but nothing happens.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #37  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
It should pop up in your Misc section in EcuFlash.

What Rom ID are you running?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:55 PM
  #38  
Mojito's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Well, I tried for 15 and 22 which inherits from 15.
Do I understand correctly that it should be put in both, rom xml and base xml?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #39  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
All that can go in your 15 file. You can put the Scaling part in your Base if you want. But if you do, leave it out of your 15 file.

To simplify, I'd just stick it in your 15 file.

I just realized what could be happening. EcuFlash used the information INSIDE the definition files for the ROM Id's, NOT the names of the files. So if you have one named junk.xml that has a 52680015 definition inside it, EcuFlash may use that one instead of your actual 52680015.xml file. So, if you have old versions you are trying to save, move them OUT of your RomMetaData folder.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 07:12 PM
  #40  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
or dont call them .xml
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 11:15 PM
  #41  
Bob_tm's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Ukraine
can it be some kind of injection phasing?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 04:05 AM
  #42  
Mojito's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Originally Posted by Golden
All that can go in your 15 file. You can put the Scaling part in your Base if you want. But if you do, leave it out of your 15 file.

To simplify, I'd just stick it in your 15 file.

I just realized what could be happening. EcuFlash used the information INSIDE the definition files for the ROM Id's, NOT the names of the files. So if you have one named junk.xml that has a 52680015 definition inside it, EcuFlash may use that one instead of your actual 52680015.xml file. So, if you have old versions you are trying to save, move them OUT of your RomMetaData folder.
Originally Posted by tephra
or dont call them .xml
It seems that I have some sort of problem with EcuFlash. Whatever changes I do to the xml files, they just don't get reflected when I open a ROM file. It looks like EcuFlash takes xmls from somewhere else. I tried to reinstall ecuflash, deleted all definitions, but it didn't help. This an offtopic, but may be you guys can give me a quick solution?
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 06:53 AM
  #43  
Mojito's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
From: Moscow, Russia
Ok, just got the map to show up and discovered that I had it completely flat @ 100%. So whoever tuned my car new about it.
I really hope you guys figure out how to properly use it.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2010 | 10:05 AM
  #44  
Golden's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
If you are tuned with it flat, then you are probably ok.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #45  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Any more info found on this map?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 PM.