Can someone explain (timing related Q)
https://img196.imageshack.us/img196/...coldtiming.png
Can someone explain why the car should have MORE timing when the Coolant Temp is cold? The percentage modifier gets applied to the timing table - so once the car is warm we have 0% of whatever is in the table... Forget that they are called EGR - I think thats plain wrong... This might explain my car knocking when cold, especially if its adding 9* of timing at 2000rpm Cheers D. |
Originally Posted by tephra
(Post 9112246)
https://img196.imageshack.us/img196/...coldtiming.png
Can someone explain why the car should have MORE timing when the Coolant Temp is cold? The percentage modifier gets applied to the timing table - so once the car is warm we have 0% of whatever is in the table... Forget that they are called EGR - I think thats plain wrong... This might explain my car knocking when cold, especially if its adding 9* of timing at 2000rpm Cheers D. I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-) |
Originally Posted by xhomm02
(Post 9112284)
According to what I have read, the engine tries to get as high EGT after starting as possible (via increased timing) to get catalysator quickly to its operation temperature to have best catalytic efficiency.
I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-) |
Originally Posted by xhomm02
(Post 9112284)
According to what I have read, the engine tries to get as high EGT after starting as possible (via increased timing) to get catalysator quickly to its operation temperature to have best catalytic efficiency.
I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-) |
Originally Posted by xhomm02
(Post 9112284)
According to what I have read, the engine tries to get as high EGT after starting as possible (via increased timing) to get catalysator quickly to its operation temperature to have best catalytic efficiency.
I think if you run test pipe, you can set the increase to 0. You can do it with catalysator as well, but environment wil suffer ;-) I just asked the same question and I got very much the same answer. |
Originally Posted by mrfred
(Post 9112530)
I think its timing retard puts more heat in the exhaust. There are cat efficiency tables that retard the timing when the engine is cold. This same cold engine ign advance table is in the CT9A ROMs. Perhaps cold engines need more advance to create a more complete burn. At any rate, I find it comical that both advance and retard tables exist.
I will have to look up the coldstart tables and see what their conditions are.. |
Originally Posted by tephra
(Post 9112246)
This might explain my car knocking when cold, especially if its adding 9* of timing at 2000rpm
Cheers D. Tephra can you get that table(s) for my rom? 55590107 (Your 2010 RA Tephra ROM) EDIT: I have the main one: <table name="EGR Timing Advance" address="57359" category="Timing" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Timing"> <table name="Load" address="61778" type="X Axis" elements="9" scaling="Load"/> <table name="RPM" address="6175e" type="Y Axis" elements="10" scaling="RPM"/> </table> |
Another question:
I've been curious about the table labeled "Ignition Warmup Retard" in the Evo 10/RA roms. With it set to "timing" scaling they read positive timing, with it set to "Min Timing" they read negative timing. The Defs currently out have them as "timing" Tephra, do you know which is correct? |
I was always under the impression that this was an absolute value that was mathematically applied as a subtraction to timing... but maybe I'm thinking about the other table.
|
Originally Posted by fostytou
(Post 9113344)
I was always under the impression that this was an absolute value that was mathematically applied as a subtraction to timing... but maybe I'm thinking about the other table.
I want 0, not -20 so I would like to find out for sure. |
emailed...
|
Originally Posted by razorlab
(Post 9113330)
Another question:
I've been curious about the table labeled "Ignition Warmup Retard" in the Evo 10/RA roms. With it set to "timing" scaling they read positive timing, with it set to "Min Timing" they read negative timing. The Defs currently out have them as "timing" Tephra, do you know which is correct? |
Originally Posted by mrfred
(Post 9112530)
I think its timing retard puts more heat in the exhaust.
|
Originally Posted by razorlab
(Post 9113330)
Another question:
I've been curious about the table labeled "Ignition Warmup Retard" in the Evo 10/RA roms. With it set to "timing" scaling they read positive timing, with it set to "Min Timing" they read negative timing. The Defs currently out have them as "timing" Tephra, do you know which is correct? The scaling is Timing, but what happens is that under certain conditions the ECU interpolates between this map and the regular timing maps. After about 50C it doesn't use this map at all... |
Isn't this the map that controls that?
(for the 2010 maps) <table name="Percent Low Temp Timing Trim vs Coolant Temp" address="561bc" category="Timing" type="2D" scaling="Percent255"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="61310" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="TempFarenheit"/> </table> |
Maybe when cold the engine needs a bit more advance to bring heat in and seal the piston rings bring the pressure up and up to operating temp a bit quicker. Or when the engine is cold it can't ignite fuel as well with lower timing.
|
Originally Posted by Golden
(Post 9113675)
Isn't this the map that controls that?
(for the 2010 maps) <table name="Percent Low Temp Timing Trim vs Coolant Temp" address="561bc" category="Timing" type="2D" scaling="Percent255"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="61310" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="TempFarenheit"/> </table> |
https://img687.imageshack.us/img687/...ompensatio.png
Sure its overly simplified and doesn't explain WHY, but at least we know it does it :) :thumbup: |
Got another table:
https://img842.imageshack.us/img842/...ccumulator.png This one seems to be linked to a MAFHz Accumulator, absolutley no idea, but it looks like it is activated when the MAFHz accumulator sees 1800 grams of air (yeh weird) I havn't worked out the interval for the collection period yet... |
Well I think that map is ONLY used when the engine isn't upto temp yet...
So we can pretty much ignore it :) |
https://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2175...ngcompensa.png
This one is VERY interesting, there are two tables, but they look similar. I am not really a fan of the +20*.. Seems to be applied when Actual MIVEC Exhaust is greater or less than the value in the map... Might be the source of our low load knock bryan? |
ok... There are 4 tables, 2 for Intake 2 for Exhaust MIVEC.
Basically the ECU works out if the Actual Exhaust MIVEC is less than or greater than the Map Exhaust MIVEC. Same for Intake MIVEC Once it chooses which table to get the data from it then multiplies the actual difference by whatever the map lookup results in then divides by 0xA00 THEN it applies that as an ignition timing compensation... ie, if you had 5* different between actual and map for the exhaust then it would be: (5 * 32) * (whatever is in these 4 maps, ie 20*) / 0xA00 = 1.25* so your timing would go up or down 1* now this doesn't seem to be very much, but I just dont like the looks of these 4 tables: https://img571.imageshack.us/img571/...vecoverrun.png https://img560.imageshack.us/img560/...vecunderru.png https://img101.imageshack.us/img101/...vecoverrun.png https://img823.imageshack.us/img823/...ecunderrun.png The values just seem so random, 20 with 0's on either side... I am thinking of zero'ing out these tables :) |
Hrmm
Bryan your maps are already zero'd out. I emailed you the def's.. a quick look at 52690022 shows they are similar to mine.. as is 2011 Au Evo. MR vs GSR same thing almost.. Why the difference for RA vs Evo?? |
Different cams stock?
|
Originally Posted by Golden
(Post 9113675)
Isn't this the map that controls that?
(for the 2010 maps) <table name="Percent Low Temp Timing Trim vs Coolant Temp" address="561bc" category="Timing" type="2D" scaling="Percent255"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="61310" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="TempFarenheit"/> </table> |
Originally Posted by tephra
(Post 9114021)
Got another table:
https://img842.imageshack.us/img842/...ccumulator.png This one seems to be linked to a MAFHz Accumulator, absolutley no idea, but it looks like it is activated when the MAFHz accumulator sees 1800 grams of air (yeh weird) That sure looks just like the cold ignition retard table(s) from Evo 8/9 |
Originally Posted by razorlab
(Post 9115114)
Every time I change that table it ends up triggering a P050B
When I zero out that table, my car runs a ton better in the cold when ECT < 120*F. |
Originally Posted by Golden
(Post 9115427)
Does it idle better when cold?
When I zero out that table, my car runs a ton better in the cold when ECT < 120*F. Yup works great on evo 8/9. I put it back to OEM values on my RA because I was sick of getting the CEL. Do you not get a P050B? The RA's seem to get it when tweaking that table. |
No I don't get it. I did it to a 2010 RA that I'm tuning. He is running an AP. I don't think he is throwing any codes. I'll double check.
|
Just checked.. no CEL after a week or so.
|
Originally Posted by tephra
(Post 9114261)
ok... There are 4 tables, 2 for Intake 2 for Exhaust MIVEC.
Basically the ECU works out if the Actual Exhaust MIVEC is less than or greater than the Map Exhaust MIVEC. Same for Intake MIVEC Once it chooses which table to get the data from it then multiplies the actual difference by whatever the map lookup results in then divides by 0xA00 THEN it applies that as an ignition timing compensation... ie, if you had 5* different between actual and map for the exhaust then it would be: (5 * 32) * (whatever is in these 4 maps, ie 20*) / 0xA00 = 1.25* so your timing would go up or down 1* now this doesn't seem to be very much, but I just dont like the looks of these 4 tables: https://img571.imageshack.us/img571/...vecoverrun.png https://img560.imageshack.us/img560/...vecunderru.png https://img101.imageshack.us/img101/...vecoverrun.png https://img823.imageshack.us/img823/...ecunderrun.png The values just seem so random, 20 with 0's on either side... I am thinking of zero'ing out these tables :) I see now need for these random values or how they would actually help at all... :thumbdown |
Originally Posted by Golden
(Post 9116836)
Just checked.. no CEL after a week or so.
I changed them for the RA Basemaps and everyone that used it started getting P050B's, but it back to OEM values and all gone. |
All 0's.
In my car, I run E-85 and when the ECT is cold, it runs very nice with those settings. Before I zeroed out the table, it would hesitate / miss a bunch when cold. My wideband would go massively lean and the engine would feel like it died. Now, it runs perfect when cold. I used to have to warm it up to 100*f before it would drive normal. Now I can drive it much colder if I have to. I normally like to warm it up though. |
1 Attachment(s)
Screen shot - 2010 RA is the ATR table; 2010 GSR is the EcuFlash table (my car)
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/at...1&d=1299005836 |
Originally Posted by Golden
(Post 9118580)
All 0's.
In my car, I run E-85 and when the ECT is cold, it runs very nice with those settings. Before I zeroed out the table, it would hesitate / miss a bunch when cold. My wideband would go massively lean and the engine would feel like it died. Now, it runs perfect when cold. I used to have to warm it up to 100*f before it would drive normal. Now I can drive it much colder if I have to. I normally like to warm it up though. On the RA, if i zero it or even half it, I throw the P050B. |
you guys might be talking about different tables.
there are two that are the same size and very close in values. maybe post up your addresses to confirm :) |
cold air is denser, which means there's more of it to use during the combustion cycle....principle #1 of turbos
|
The table I am talking about is at:
52680015 50793 555x000x 507a5 |
any updates on this? I suffer from excessive timing retard until coolant temp rises just a little bit... car falls flat on its face and goes lean, and I believe it is related (I knew there were more coolant related timing maps than met the eye)
|
Tephra, back to your original post question, warmup advance (adding), most aftermarket engine management have a 2D table to add timing when the coolant is low.
I believe it is to help with the slower burn rate of gasoline when cold. Adding advance when cold certainly has hepled in these circumstances, so I was always curious as to why a corresponding table was not found in our ROMs. Seems like it was there all along - will have to start searching again I guess. |
Originally Posted by merlin.oz
(Post 9216828)
Tephra, back to your original post question, warmup advance (adding), most aftermarket engine management have a 2D table to add timing when the coolant is low.
I believe it is to help with the slower burn rate of gasoline when cold. Adding advance when cold certainly has hepled in these circumstances, so I was always curious as to why a corresponding table was not found in our ROMs. Seems like it was there all along - will have to start searching again I guess. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:09 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands