Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

WRX owner dropping in. Possibly making the switch...

Old Apr 1, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #1  
japslapr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: va beach
WRX owner dropping in. Possibly making the switch...

I'm going to be roaming around the boards to see if this is something I really want to do. I can't exactly sell the Subbie as I have WAY too much invested in it and refuse to take the loss. I'm trying to pawn it off on the wife so I can build something else so we'll see how that goes. I'll either go old school EVO or build a V8 FI car.
The WRX:




It's one of (top 3) highest whp privately owned Ej205 powered cars in the country.

Built motor, AEM, dogbox tranny, etc...

See you guys around.

Derf
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 09:36 PM
  #2  
DeeezNuuuts83's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 27
From: Southern California
How much whp exactly?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2008 | 09:44 PM
  #3  
evo_domination's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Very clean rex
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 02:49 AM
  #4  
importjake00's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,873
Likes: 0
From: kent wa
Originally Posted by DeeezNuuuts83
How much whp exactly?
I would love to know.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 09:16 AM
  #5  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Unless he changed his turbo from the gt30r it should be 425whp on 93+meth and close to 500whp on c16.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #6  
japslapr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Originally Posted by importjake00
I would love to know.
The car made 483 on 110 octane on 8.7:1 compression. We just bumped the compression to a bit over 9 so that should go up some.

405 on 21psi... that's what I drove around on when I dorve the car on the street.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #7  
EVOSE06's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by japslapr
The car made 483 on 110 octane on 8.7:1 compression. We just bumped the compression to a bit over 9 so that should go up some.

405 on 21psi... that's what I drove around on when I dorve the car on the street.
Wow those are impressive #'s. I would love to have something like your wagon. It must be a lot of fun to sucker other high performance cars into playing and then just ripping them apart.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #8  
05ah8james's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Dooo it. I just did. 05 STi to 05 evo MR. Join the dark side
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 10:49 AM
  #9  
BURNALL_4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
NICE!..Great Power too.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:34 PM
  #10  
japslapr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Originally Posted by 05ah8james
Dooo it. I just did. 05 STi to 05 evo MR. Join the dark side
The biggest thing for me is the power those 4g63's are capable of. All comparisons of EVO's and STi's completely stop when you really get into modding engine internals and throwing on huge turbo's. I mean... my car makes great power... but there's NO reason a 500whp car should be anywhere close to setting records, even on a 2.0l. I'll go old school EVO if I do swap tho. I love the older bodies. That or hop on the big displacement FI band wagon. I'd like to come close to doubling the power I'm making now. Only issue now is choosing HOW to do so.

This is all me:
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 12:55 PM
  #11  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
FYI if you want to come close as possible to 1000whp I do suggest you don't get a stroker motor. The higher rev limits of the 2.0L make it easier to create high horsepower with the large gt42r turbo's.

To even do it your going to need a whole host of things to make it happen

Fully built 2.0L
Valve springs or a race head (ported would be better :P) after all you want to spin this to 9500rpm
GT42r turbo
LARGE fueling system twin pump for sure
Racing large diameter intercooler
Tail BOV
I'm not sure of the injector setup maybe twin rail
VSR intake manifold will help make the topend
AEM management system using Speed density setup
COP ignition setup MW box

I'm probably missing a whole host of things but this list by its own is quite expensive.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:18 PM
  #12  
japslapr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: va beach
Originally Posted by RoadSpike
FYI if you want to come close as possible to 1000whp I do suggest you don't get a stroker motor. The higher rev limits of the 2.0L make it easier to create high horsepower with the large gt42r turbo's.

To even do it your going to need a whole host of things to make it happen

Fully built 2.0L
Valve springs or a race head (ported would be better :P) after all you want to spin this to 9500rpm
GT42r turbo
LARGE fueling system twin pump for sure
Racing large diameter intercooler
Tail BOV
I'm not sure of the injector setup maybe twin rail
VSR intake manifold will help make the topend
AEM management system using Speed density setup
COP ignition setup MW box

I'm probably missing a whole host of things but this list by its own is quite expensive.
In bold... my Subaru has. Not to mention almost 7k worth of tranny. I understand how pricey this gets. Been there, done that.

I didn't realize the stroker motor wouldn't rev to 9k+. Makes sense tho. You'd think with a lightened rotating assembly you'd get there. Owell... I have no problems running the bottle.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2008 | 01:26 PM
  #13  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by japslapr
In bold... my Subaru has. Not to mention almost 7k worth of tranny. I understand how pricey this gets. Been there, done that.

I didn't realize the stroker motor wouldn't rev to 9k+. Makes sense tho. You'd think with a lightened rotating assembly you'd get there. Owell... I have no problems running the bottle.
Well AMS does make one to that spec a 2.3RR but the cost is double that of a 2.0L. Its your money though I'd just stick to what the big tuning shops tell you should go on there for high horsepower.

IE Buschur, AMS

Good luck with your future builds
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:41 PM.