Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Everything you wanted to know or didn't want to know about the SRT-4 *VERY LONG*

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 11:28 AM
  #31  
evo77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Zion, IL
I like my basket-handle spoiler.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #32  
loj68's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally Posted by Steiner
I'm selling it and getting an Evo...of course.


of course!!!! Good decision for sure!
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2005 | 11:09 PM
  #33  
soule77's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Haleiwa, HI
The SRT4 is a good car, just like the STI is a good car, its all about personal opinion and how much money you are willing to sink into it. The #1 reason i like this forum is that it focuses on engineering and technical knowhow. One thing we can all agree on is that we all like small cars that produce alot of wHp. Bottom line is anyone who is a true car enthusiast should appreciate any vehicle that delievers on the track and on the street.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 06:58 AM
  #34  
xr4man's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: md
sweet article. i have been wondering since the turbo cruiser came out if the engine was a turbo 4g64 or a dodge powerplant.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 10:22 PM
  #35  
Steiner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Originally Posted by CF-Ninja
meh.... it will probably blow up and have all the paint fall off after 3-4 years as do most dodge neons.... They could have made a cool car (sort of) if it didnt look just like any other neon....

I saw one in a parking lot the other day. They have those things running extremely lean. The car shook and sounded like it was backfiring while idling. I'll stick with my RA
Wrong, wrong and wrong. My SRT-4 took everything I threw at it...stage 1, exhaust, stage 2, AGP WGA, MBC, etc...and didn't have a single problem for the 25,000 miles I owned it. Any car that traps 100mph+ for less than $20k is "cool" as far as I'm concerned. You drive a Mitsubishi...and it's not even an Evo. Get off your high horse dude. The SRT-4 is much better performer and a much better value than a Lancer Ralliart.

Also the SRT-4 doesn't come with a muffler...just a single resonator. That's why it's so loud. As far as A/F ratio...you couldn't have been more off. The car runs pig rich from the factory. That's why simply cranking up the boost another 3-5psi will yield 40whp+ with safe A/F ratios.

I love how the "it's just a Neon" fools spout off opinion like it's fact previous to even researching the car. At least bring some knowledge to the discussion before giving an opinion.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #36  
ARVSHOP's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: MILLBRAE,CA
OK GUYS...before this gets big lets just stop our swordfighting because it aint gonna do anybody good....

SRT4 is good value for the price
Reply
Old May 27, 2005 | 10:46 PM
  #37  
Santhology's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
From: Perris, Ca
Originally Posted by ARVSHOP
OK GUYS...before this gets big lets just stop our swordfighting because it aint gonna do anybody good....

SRT4 is good value for the price
Reply
Old May 31, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #38  
nitro's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by loj68
but the SRT-4 smokes any of the other alternatives at $21k and under.......very badly too. Like any car, when you jack up the HP you'll wanna upgrade your clutch accordingly. The stock clutch holds up to the rigors of the Stage I & II upgrades just fine. I agree though that you soon feel the limits of FWD with the amount of power that the SRT puts down which is why I got the Z. If you're spending $21k for a new car FWD is your only choice currently in the USA and as a former owner I'd recommend the SRT-4 all day......fantastic little car and TONS of potential.
Well, I can think of one other car under 21K that it won't smoke. It would walk away, but not terrribly hard. The Cobalt SS!
Reply
Old May 31, 2005 | 06:13 PM
  #39  
mike69's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
From: NA
The Cobalt SS doesn't have an LSD included in the base price, and I'm pretty sure it costs more than 21k.
Reply
Old May 31, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #40  
Steiner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Originally Posted by nitro
Well, I can think of one other car under 21K that it won't smoke. It would walk away, but not terrribly hard. The Cobalt SS!
I drove an Ion Redline (same thing as the Cobalt SS) and it really doesn't compare to the SRT-4 in terms of power. The horsepower is similair on paper but, depending on the dyno, the SRT-4 puts down another 25-40whp. It also only needs 6k RPM's to do it. The horsepower isn't the thing you notice right away though...it's the torque. The SRT-4 puts down another 75-100ftq than the Cobalt SS. That's significant. The Ion Redline/Cobalt SS are quick, but they're supercharged 4 bangers, not turbocharged 4 bangers. The difference you feel when you get on the gas is huge. The SRT-4 has low end grunt like a small block V8. The Ion Redline/Cobalt SS feels more like a Honda Vtec 4 banger on steroids. They're quick, but you never forget it's a supercharged 4 cylinder.

The SRT-4 is in an altogether different class of power than the Cobalt SS/Ion Redline IMHO.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 02:35 AM
  #41  
nitro's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
The Cobalt is a different car than the Redline. It is geared differently (For some odd reason, the Redline's gearing is very wide and many reviews state that they had a hard time shifting into the sweet spot without hitting the rev limiter, great for a car named the Redline.) and magazine tests have placed the Cobalt SS a half second quiker in the 1/4, despite the larger wheels/tires. The best run for a Redline so far is a 14.7, which is poo for what it is in my book. But the best run out of a Cobalt SS thus far is a 14.2. Stock SRT-4's (without the staged upgrades) run about 13.9-14 flat. If you consider 3 tenths to be smoking a car, that's your opinion. And the Cobalt is better in the twisties.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #42  
evo77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Zion, IL
People, the list can go on and on about why didn't Dodge do this or why didn't Dodge do that for the SRT-4. The fact is, they could have but the numero uno priority was to keep it affordable. Plain and simple.

RWD however was NOT possible. The PL platfrom was not designed to be RWD. And even if they somehow did manage to engineer a RWD system on the car, it wouldn't cost under $20k that's for sure.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #43  
evo77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
From: Zion, IL
I updated the info on the first page with the ACR and Commemorative Edition. Also changed a few of the pics.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2006 | 10:11 PM
  #44  
slo4door's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
evo , great write-up . wonderful . job on educating well done
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2006 | 07:15 AM
  #45  
EVOeight's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
If they would just offer an AWD version they would really have something. Having 300HP in a front wheel drive car is just not fun in my opinion...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:19 AM.