SCC Sti shootout
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, Maryland
SCC Sti shootout
okay the new SCC has the STi vs 3 highly tuned WRX's.... one question...the SPI WRX had the most power and was the slowest...now...the turbo lag i understand...but they also said the CLUTCh wouldnt slip at all (theoretically a good thing) , but made it so they couldnt boost rev launch and ruined their 60ft 1/4 mile times....
I was contemplating changing clutches.... now Im afraid.... please lend some advice
-SHAHUL
ps- VISHNU had the fastest, but cheated with RA1- tires...lol, j/k
I was contemplating changing clutches.... now Im afraid.... please lend some advice
-SHAHUL
ps- VISHNU had the fastest, but cheated with RA1- tires...lol, j/k
Re: SCC Sti shootout
Originally posted by Shahul X
okay the new SCC has the STi vs 3 highly tuned WRX's.... one question...the SPI WRX had the most power and was the slowest...now...the turbo lag i understand...but they also said the CLUTCh wouldnt slip at all (theoretically a good thing) , but made it so they couldnt boost rev launch and ruined their 60ft 1/4 mile times....
I was contemplating changing clutches.... now Im afraid.... please lend some advice
-SHAHUL
ps- VISHNU had the fastest, but cheated with RA1- tires...lol, j/k
okay the new SCC has the STi vs 3 highly tuned WRX's.... one question...the SPI WRX had the most power and was the slowest...now...the turbo lag i understand...but they also said the CLUTCh wouldnt slip at all (theoretically a good thing) , but made it so they couldnt boost rev launch and ruined their 60ft 1/4 mile times....
I was contemplating changing clutches.... now Im afraid.... please lend some advice
-SHAHUL
ps- VISHNU had the fastest, but cheated with RA1- tires...lol, j/k
110 in the 1/4 for a off to shelf kit with 91oct (VERY NICE)My Best
Eric
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
From: Rockville, Maryland
so many complain about the evo clutch... is the exedy twin disc the best way to go you think? Will it "slip" a bit for spooling? 110 in the 1/4 would be nice 
-Shahul

-Shahul
Originally posted by Shahul X
so many complain about the evo clutch... is the exedy twin disc the best way to go you think? Will it "slip" a bit for spooling? 110 in the 1/4 would be nice
-Shahul
so many complain about the evo clutch... is the exedy twin disc the best way to go you think? Will it "slip" a bit for spooling? 110 in the 1/4 would be nice

-Shahul
Eric
u dun slip the clutch on a AWD turbo. U boost and dump the clutch, if you do it right, the wheels will spin, and give u sub 2 60' times. HOWEVER, if u don't do it right, say goodbye to ur old tranny and say hello to a new tranny. Something has to slip, whether it be ur tires or ur tranny.
Trending Topics
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
FWIW, we ran a Helix metalic clutch in our EVO (stage zero plus downpipe) for two magazine camparo tests (SCC and C&D) which should be showing up on the stands within the next month or two. While it was impressively streetable in stop and go traffic (as far as metalic clutches go), it slowed down high-rpm shifting a lot. Above 5000rpm, the gears would grind terribly if you tried to shift quickly. Needless to say, this slowed down acceleration times dramatically. ETs were a miserable 13.0 with good traps of 107-108mph on 91 octane. Datalogs showed the 3-4 shift taking 1 full second, compared to the usual 0.3-.06 seconds it should otherwise take. Appearantly, the Helix clutch wouldn't release well enough when it was spinning quickly.
Cheers,
Shiv
PS. Our last-minute wrenching revealed that the ralliart front differential won't fit in the EVO 8 housing either.
Cheers,
Shiv
PS. Our last-minute wrenching revealed that the ralliart front differential won't fit in the EVO 8 housing either.
Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Jun 19, 2003 at 02:59 PM.
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
FWIW, we ran a Helix metalic clutch in our EVO (stage zero plus downpipe) ...Datalogs showed the 3-4 shift taking 1 full second, compared to the usual 0.3-.06 seconds it should otherwise take. Appearantly, the Helix clutch wouldn't release well enough when it was spinning quickly.
Cheers,
Shiv
FWIW, we ran a Helix metalic clutch in our EVO (stage zero plus downpipe) ...Datalogs showed the 3-4 shift taking 1 full second, compared to the usual 0.3-.06 seconds it should otherwise take. Appearantly, the Helix clutch wouldn't release well enough when it was spinning quickly.
Cheers,
Shiv
Have you done any experimenting with removal of the valve plate and valve plate spring in the clutch release cyllinder? It appears that this setup is designed to increase the duration of the final pressure transfer from the release cylinder when engaging and disengaging the clutch. With the valve plate (restrictor) and valve plate spring (restrictor volume byppass mecahnism) removed, the pressure transfer should occur quicker and permit faster engagement and disengagement.
This probably has nothing to do with your shifting difficulties experienced with Helix clutch but may contribute to cluth slippage and slow engagement/disengagement cycles in general.
Originally posted by jfh
Have you done any experimenting with removal of the valve plate and valve plate spring in the clutch release cyllinder? It appears that this setup is designed to increase the duration of the final pressure transfer from the release cylinder when engaging and disengaging the clutch.
Have you done any experimenting with removal of the valve plate and valve plate spring in the clutch release cyllinder? It appears that this setup is designed to increase the duration of the final pressure transfer from the release cylinder when engaging and disengaging the clutch.

--Dan
Mach V Motorsports
MachEVO.com


