Focus RS
Jun 20, 2016, 09:04 PM
#3691
Do you chug a bottle of vodka before posting or something?
You initially claimed the Evo was never tested in the US. That was downright false.
When presented with the actual test, you claimed that 2/5 isn't horrible, despite it meaning you are 5 times more likely to be injured than a 5/5 rating. It means 1/5-1/4 people are injured in a driver's side impact. That's horrible.
Now you're trying to argue semantics, namely whether it's "horrible" or "not good" which is amusing given that you struggle with English at times. Like a child, you're saying that you'll keep arguing unless we quit.
Grow the **** up, Rob. You're embarrassing the rally community. You were wrong. That's fine, it happens.
You initially claimed the Evo was never tested in the US. That was downright false.
When presented with the actual test, you claimed that 2/5 isn't horrible, despite it meaning you are 5 times more likely to be injured than a 5/5 rating. It means 1/5-1/4 people are injured in a driver's side impact. That's horrible.
Now you're trying to argue semantics, namely whether it's "horrible" or "not good" which is amusing given that you struggle with English at times. Like a child, you're saying that you'll keep arguing unless we quit.
Grow the **** up, Rob. You're embarrassing the rally community. You were wrong. That's fine, it happens.
Jun 20, 2016, 09:05 PM
#3692
Have you learned the word irony yet?
BTW (By The Way), congrats on derailing yet another thread.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/lo...megamerge.html
BTW (By The Way), congrats on derailing yet another thread.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/lo...megamerge.html
Jun 20, 2016, 09:08 PM
#3694
talk to razer about that one of your romantic night 
http://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle+Shop...ESTA&year=2015
http://www.safercar.gov/Vehicle+Shop...ESTA&year=2015
What does your link have to do with anything? You've linked of the Ford Fiesta. How is that related to your incorrect claims regarding the Evo or the Focus RS?
Jun 20, 2016, 10:42 PM
#3697
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Last I checked, 2/5 is 40%, which is an F, as in FAILED....lol. I'm gonna have to start checking up before I go though green lights. I knew the ct9a wasn't great. But that's just plain bad.... 
Jun 21, 2016, 07:47 AM
#3699
Where did anyone even suggest that? Some of us are simply pointing that comparing a new car built to modern safety standards to a now 10 year old car built on an old chassis isn't fair or reasonable. We might as well compare the 2006 Evo to a car built in the 80s for the purposes of complaining that the Evo is too heavy.
Jun 21, 2016, 08:21 AM
#3700
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
So, this is no longer the FoRS thread? lol
The following users liked this post:
Erik@MIL.SPEC (Jun 21, 2016)
The following users liked this post:
Noize (Jun 21, 2016)
Jun 21, 2016, 12:46 PM
#3705
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)