moparfan

Being tested? If true what does that imply about possible release date?

http://www.autoblog.com/2017/05/23/s...sti-spy-shots/

LetsGetThisDone

iTrader: (1)

Not a fan of the wing. Looks like tacked on ricer junk vs an OEM looking piece that comes on the Evo and WRX STI's...

subiekilla

Looks sick, to bad its a boxer engine, which is also slow.

nemsin

iTrader: (19)

Yea, its really too bad they refuse to offer a turbo model of the FRS/BRZ. Maybe in the next generation of the car. http://jalopnik.com/subaru-boss-conf...ith-1601705084

Noize

iTrader: (24)

That's a current, relevant article.

nemsin

iTrader: (19)

Here you go http://www.leftlanenews.com/secondge...med-93504.html

WarmMilk

iTrader: (1)

if it turns out this thing is getting a turbo, I might have to sell my miata for one of these...

kyoo

iTrader: (29)

****. that wing, really? I think I saw the same one on a cavalier the other day. would much rather if it had the park bench the evos/stis have. wtf

WarmMilk

iTrader: (1)

I'd just replace that wing with a proper track wing

nemsin

iTrader: (19)

Hopefully Toyota ditches the boxer engine and goes with a detuned version of the turbo charged 1.6 from the WRC Yaris.

WarmMilk

iTrader: (1)

haha, yeah, thats not gonna happen... at least not with this gen

the obvious solution is putting in the wrx engine since it already has the same engine minus the turbo. those do 300whp with a couple bolt on's and a tune, and thats plenty for an 86... and they spool like nobodies business, its making good usable boost under 2k rpm. it'd be an awesome engine for the this car.

nemsin

iTrader: (19)

I meant for the 2nd generation.

WarmMilk

iTrader: (1)

personally I'd rather see the wrx engine. more displacement is better than less

LetsGetThisDone

iTrader: (1)

The FA20 is reasonably reliable. Especially compare to the EJ25. No need to change the engine. Just needs a turbo. As warmmilk said, the WRX unit would be solid.

moparfan

They'll put in the old STI motor to keep the ringland heritage.