Switching from Bridgestone RE71R to Nexen N FERA SUR4G.
#16
was thinking of switching, i heard they run pretty wide.. im surprised at the tire pressures, i've been running 36psi all around for autox, are you guys seeing benefit up closer to 40 for re71rs? they'll probably last me another half season here, then switch to nexens or maybe the bfgs
265 RE71R pinched on a 8.5 inch rim. 257mm sidewall to sidewall.
265 SUR4G on the same rim. Again, 257mm sidewall to sidewall.
I have to spray after the second run also. Even with the spraying, after run 4 or so the fronts would lose noticeable amount of grip. I run on medium grip asphalt and sweeper heavy courses.
#20
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
A fellow autocrosser who I'm friends with asked if he could try to drive my EVO. He is a good driver and drives an FR-S. Well I warned him of the "NO ABS" and this is what happens when you aren't use to having that feature. I lost a good set of RE71Rs as a result and moved on to the NEXEN.
#21
Evolved Member
Now, when you have a choice of running any rim, you could find better fit for sure from those that are mentioned above.
When you are in STU and you can run any rim, but limited to 265s, I would run those without hesitation on probably 10.5" rims.
When you are in BS and can run any tire that can fit on those OEM 8.5" rims (on the car that has over 1,000 lb on each of the front wheel), you should go 275s to get help with all that weight as much as you can. Since they are definitively stretched a bit, 265s might be an option as well, but would not recommend anything smaller than that!
#23
Evolved Member
As of the off topic part, we have B-Street topic in here, which might be an alternative...
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (29)
I run 265s for my daily driving and they are pretty much square on those 8.5" OEM rims (Conti DSWs 06). There is nothing wrong with this setup and it would be highly recommended.
Now, when you have a choice of running any rim, you could find better fit for sure from those that are mentioned above.
When you are in STU and you can run any rim, but limited to 265s, I would run those without hesitation on probably 10.5" rims.
When you are in BS and can run any tire that can fit on those OEM 8.5" rims (on the car that has over 1,000 lb on each of the front wheel), you should go 275s to get help with all that weight as much as you can. Since they are definitively stretched a bit, 265s might be an option as well, but would not recommend anything smaller than that!
Now, when you have a choice of running any rim, you could find better fit for sure from those that are mentioned above.
When you are in STU and you can run any rim, but limited to 265s, I would run those without hesitation on probably 10.5" rims.
When you are in BS and can run any tire that can fit on those OEM 8.5" rims (on the car that has over 1,000 lb on each of the front wheel), you should go 275s to get help with all that weight as much as you can. Since they are definitively stretched a bit, 265s might be an option as well, but would not recommend anything smaller than that!
#25
Evolved Member
none of the studies done by GRM/andy hollis support this. can you please cite any data regarding what you claim? This was true on r-comps, but on street tires (will vary depending on the street tire) this no longer holds, and the width of contact patch that best matches the width of the wheel tends to perform the best. If there are gains, they are limited at best and sacrifice things like steering feel
In our case, with all that weight (I have around 1,020 lb on each wheel, without me in there) in the front, the larger will be better in dealing with heat buildup that is the worst enemy of our front grip. If car would have any bad things from it, I would say don't do it. But, I have yet to see any issue with it, aside from the occasional rubbing at the full lock.
#27
none of the studies done by GRM/andy hollis support this. can you please cite any data regarding what you claim? This was true on r-comps, but on street tires (will vary depending on the street tire) this no longer holds, and the width of contact patch that best matches the width of the wheel tends to perform the best. If there are gains, they are limited at best and sacrifice things like steering feel
The drop in time came from faster turn in and more mid corner grip. The Type R never had any problem putting power down even on 245s.
#28
Evolved Member
Different car, but Danny Kao dropped half a second on a 40 sec course going from 245 to 285 (8.5 rims) on the fronts of his Type R. Brian Karwan tested the car with him and he had the same result.
The drop in time came from faster turn in and more mid corner grip. The Type R never had any problem putting power down even on 245s.
The drop in time came from faster turn in and more mid corner grip. The Type R never had any problem putting power down even on 245s.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
letsgetthisdone
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
6
Jul 9, 2015 06:07 AM