![]() |
Originally Posted by murlo26
(Post 9187152)
^You cannot spike 29psi on a 10.5 compression motor on pump gas...not a chance in hell.
Rob, I wouldn't go over 9.5 if you want to run 29psi spike. To utilize a high compression motor you really need to run race fuel or E85. My tuner prefers running E98 even on those motors. /we did run race fuel before(104), and really wasn't worthy for us by a big margin./ but myabe the new engine will require it. depends what we will decide to build. |
Originally Posted by murlo26
(Post 9187945)
There you go :)
It wasn't long ago I just wanted bolt ons and 300whp...now I'm double that power. It's a disease and it won't go away any time soon. that doesnt count for how many people you influence to go that way also. if modding were a real disease that hurt people, a lot of people would be dead, myself included |
I am going with H beams. Mike at GST uses them in his race car's and thinks they are the best rod for my goals. He decided to go with them as they are lighter and I want 9K plus rpm's and they are rated at a way higher HP level than I will ever want in a street car. As he has built many engine's I decided to go with his advice and see how it works out. I am using the Brian Crower H beams that are rated at 1000 hp. And he told me they are good for 800 easy at the tire on his dyno. As I am not looking to go over 650 I like the lighter weight.
|
Murlo you are wrong. 29 psi and 10.5:1 on 93 octane is no problem.
|
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
(Post 9188852)
Murlo you are wrong. 29 psi and 10.5:1 on 93 octane is no problem.
I am going based off my tuners advice who has done tons of high compression motors and he literally doesn't tune high compression evos aggressively unless they are running good fuel. Even Mikey (FP black evo 9 record guy) said his car couldn't run **** for boost without knocking on pump gas on higher boost, he only ran like 23psi on pump. Also AMS expresses "extreme caution" when running pump on high compression. I am not saying you are right and I fully respect your opinion, I am just saying its not worth it, all it does is increase potential problems on pump gas, I mean what advantages do you really gain? Regardless if I lived near you I would let you tune/work on my car but I don't so I listen to my tuner and I think for safety sake pump gas is a no no on that high of compression. |
Idk how 10.5 and 29psi could possibly be safe.
But what do I know..... what direction do pistons go in a motor again? *ducks and hides* |
Originally Posted by murlo26
(Post 9187539)
It's not that the H beams don't work or are bad...but honestly, you are talking what, a savings of 1-200 bucks...in the grand scheme of things that is small potatoes. The motor is apart already, you mind as well toss in a bit of extra safety margin in case you want to go bigger later.
I built my new engine with Manley H-beam rods for 4 reasons. Cost. Reciprocating weight savings - the H-beams are literally 100 g lighter IIRC. They will handle roughly 700 WHP just fine, which is the most I'll ever want to make with my Evo X. And conversely, they limit me to not making any more power than a PT 6262 or similarly-sized turbo will make {thumbup} I'm all about longevity and bearing reliability for this mild build, and the H-beams were the way to go. This block will probably see a LOT of miles just highway cruising. ;) |
well post up results once you get it built and tuned
|
Originally Posted by UT_EvoX
(Post 9191344)
It's more like a $400 difference.
I built my new engine with Manley H-beam rods for 4 reasons. Cost. Reciprocating weight savings - the H-beams are literally 100 g lighter IIRC. They will handle roughly 700 WHP just fine, which is the most I'll ever want to make with my Evo X. And conversely, they limit me to not making any more power than a PT 6262 or similarly-sized turbo will make {thumbup} I'm all about longevity and bearing reliability for this mild build, and the H-beams were the way to go. This block will probably see a LOT of miles just highway cruising. ;) |
Well just blew my stock motor on FP black E85 AMS tuned on 29psi... I basically pulled the whole wrist pin out of the piston.. Im undecided on what motor to do yet. Maybe the AMS 900x 2.2l ... we will see I want to push this FP black as far as I can.
|
Originally Posted by ToFastforU_99
(Post 9193314)
Well just blew my stock motor on FP black E85 AMS tuned on 29psi... I basically pulled the whole wrist pin out of the piston.. Im undecided on what motor to do yet. Maybe the AMS 900x 2.2l ... we will see I want to push this FP black as far as I can.
|
Originally Posted by UT_EvoX
(Post 9191344)
It's more like a $400 difference.
I built my new engine with Manley H-beam rods for 4 reasons. Cost. Reciprocating weight savings - the H-beams are literally 100 g lighter IIRC. They will handle roughly 700 WHP just fine, which is the most I'll ever want to make with my Evo X. And conversely, they limit me to not making any more power than a PT 6262 or similarly-sized turbo will make {thumbup} I'm all about longevity and bearing reliability for this mild build, and the H-beams were the way to go. This block will probably see a LOT of miles just highway cruising. ;) As for the 10.0:1 or 10.5:1, don't want to get into a slap-fest but with 93 you'll be fine AS LONG AS YOUR TUNER IS GOOD. All ways better to be using a Pectal ecu :) |
Originally Posted by kwlevo
(Post 9194439)
If your going H beam Carrillo is where you want to go {thumbup}, but your going to pay for those sexy rods with gold bars.
As for the 10.0:1 or 10.5:1, don't want to get into a slap-fest but with 93 you'll be fine AS LONG AS YOUR TUNER IS GOOD. All ways better to be using a Pectal ecu :) |
i might have plans for a full stand alone wiring harness for a Pectel with stand alone active diff, power, ect :)
|
I said 29 isn't a problem......34 psi at 11.5:1 isn't either but is getting closer to the safe limits.
You can't take a bunch of crap and throw it together and expect to run high boost on pump gas, with any compression ratio. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands