![]() |
It's depends upon surface, like auto-x, but the real difference comes with elevation. Two cases are Road Atlanta and Sebring. RA or Roebling or Barber like tracks I run 600lb front 750 rear. Main reason is there are two key low speed turns that dip into a bowl before pointing straight uphill. You want the car to squat. Dallas's rear voodoo makes that ***** squat and launch. With more aero or non-dot's I'd jump up several hundred but on A's or R's it's about perfect.
Sebring, on the other hand, is dead ass flat and 60% concrete with high speed bumpy turns. Here you want a high rate on 90% of the course because of the G's you're pulling. However on the last turn right before the front straight it's a wild ass ride. In anything in the ranges mentioned earlier it would bounce you right into the wall or you'd have to slow or have to take a way outside line. Aka fail. So here I only go up to 700/850 but even then I liked the softer setup and carried more speed through. NOW especially with Dallas's stuff. Basically the "short comings" we used to make up with in spring,... aren't ....entirely....necessary when corrected at the arms. |
Originally Posted by Construct
(Post 11910453)
800 lb/in and 1450 lb/in is the largest front/rear difference I've seen so far. What's the reasoning behind such a large split?
|
Thanks to everyone for sharing setup info.
Originally Posted by Balrok
(Post 11910469)
Sebring, on the other hand, is dead ass flat and 60% concrete with high speed bumpy turns. Here you want a high rate on 90% of the course because of the G's you're pulling. However on the last turn right before the front straight it's a wild ass ride. In anything in the ranges mentioned earlier it would bounce you right into the wall or you'd have to slow or have to take a way outside line. Aka fail. So here I only go up to 700/850 but even then I liked the softer setup and carried more speed through. NOW especially with Dallas's stuff.
I still can't wrap my head around 1450 lb/in rears. That's almost double the rear spring rate. |
Speaking of springs:
8" 650lb/in Hypercoil: 4 lbs, 1 oz. 6" 730lb/in Swift spring: 2 lbs, 2 oz. Not huge, but I'm still surprised at how light these Swift springs are relative to the Hyperco. Judging by the marks on the shaft of the front Ohlins strut, the max travel I've used recently is about 3.4 inches. Swift rates this 6" spring for 2.8 inches of usable stroke and 3.8 inches of maximum stroke. So it won't coil bind, but it looks like I could go past the recommended stroke of the spring in certain circumstances. A 5" spring is a no-go on the front Ohlins R&T struts. |
Originally Posted by Construct
(Post 11910464)
I think those rates are more specific to AutoX and small radius cornering.
What spring rates are you running up front with those 16K rears? Maybe Dallas can fill us in on the latest thinking for track spring rates.
Originally Posted by Balrok
(Post 11910469)
It's depends upon surface, like auto-x, but the real difference comes with elevation. Two cases are Road Atlanta and Sebring. RA or Roebling or Barber like tracks I run 600lb front 750 rear. Main reason is there are two key low speed turns that dip into a bowl before pointing straight uphill. You want the car to squat. Dallas's rear voodoo makes that ***** squat and launch. With more aero or non-dot's I'd jump up several hundred but on A's or R's it's about perfect.
Sebring, on the other hand, is dead ass flat and 60% concrete with high speed bumpy turns. Here you want a high rate on 90% of the course because of the G's you're pulling. However on the last turn right before the front straight it's a wild ass ride. In anything in the ranges mentioned earlier it would bounce you right into the wall or you'd have to slow or have to take a way outside line. Aka fail. So here I only go up to 700/850 but even then I liked the softer setup and carried more speed through. NOW especially with Dallas's stuff. Basically the "short comings" we used to make up with in spring,... aren't ....entirely....necessary when corrected at the arms. What parts of Dallas' do you have? I definately need to hurry up and order a pair of front uprights. probably should consider some rears too |
Originally Posted by bee-raddd
(Post 11910484)
14kg fronts currently. or 12kg id have to check haha
What parts of Dallas' do you have? I definately need to hurry up and order a pair of front uprights. probably should consider some rears too |
800f/1600r is a good setup. Lets you stop compromising the rear alignment to get the car to turn. Put those springs on with -1.5 deg of camber and zero toe and it will be a mess.
edit: definitely an autox setup. I will say that for track work I would run a slightly softer rear spring to be able to run less rear toe-in. |
Originally Posted by griceiv
(Post 11910538)
800f/1600r is a good setup. Lets you stop compromising the rear alignment to get the car to turn. Put those springs on with -1.5 deg of camber and zero toe and it will be a mess.
edit: definitely an autox setup. I will say that for track work I would run a slightly softer rear spring to be able to run less rear toe-in. |
Originally Posted by MrAWD
(Post 11910540)
What numbers for the rear toe and camber would you recommend for such setup?
For toe, run as much as you need. If you have too much rotation on exit, you need more. I havent played with it yet, but it might also help stability if things are getting hairy in other places. |
How are you achieving that much camber in the rear? Are you using adjustable LCAs as well as toe arms or does your low ride height assist there?
|
Originally Posted by heel2toe
(Post 11910550)
How are you achieving that much camber in the rear? Are you using adjustable LCAs as well as toe arms or does your low ride height assist there?
|
Got it, so uprights then more low. Would like to start playing around with toe again. Years ago used to run lil bit of toe out in the rear to get the backend to dance but then dialed it back to 0 toe once I was able to power out with a more proper rear diff. Im only at like 1.8 in the rear with 0 toe as any more and toe became out of whack.
|
The thing that Marshal really got me to believe in is to do the thing that will have the most effect, sort out the ramifications with the minor adjustments. So everytime they added more rear spring and more toe in it got faster. We can logic out why it works, but at the end of the day they did the testing for us and we can replicate the results.
I still run low rear toe-in (like maybe 1/32-1/16" on each side) but if I can get to testing even higher rates I'll probably be upping that to even as much as 1/4" if necessary. Obviously thats full on AutoX spec though. But with my low rear toe, and just setting rear bar to soft I handle our relatively smooth tracks no problem. Now if I had to deal with bumps in the 100+ range, I may change my tune. |
Originally Posted by Dallas J
(Post 11910546)
At least another deg, but depends how low the car is. I run -3deg in the rear but I have less camber gain with the uprights (not in the steep ramp of the curve, a good thing).
For toe, run as much as you need. If you have too much rotation on exit, you need more. I havent played with it yet, but it might also help stability if things are getting hairy in other places. |
Your AYC becomes irrelevant once you move to SM and get rid of it :lol:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:14 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands