R35 GT-R Powered AWD Evo - VR38 Swap
#108
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
Has it been asked yet: Have you tested the vents in the front fenders? I've been seriously thinking of a way to reduce pressure there. I don't mind cutting up some fenders to do it.
#110
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
Maybe he is expecting the GTRs inline powertrain to move the vehicle's COG aftward, relative to the 4G63's front-heavy transverse setup. Look at his firewall and trans tunnel modifications, that VG38 is tucked in there. The GTR powertrain may be heavier, but I think his prediction of improved weight balance is plausible. Afterall, a stock Evo is around 60/40 F/R weight bias. It's not too difficult to improve upon that, especially if you posess the fab skills that are evidenced in this build thread. That being said, he has taken a lot of weight out of the rear of the vehicle so it will be a balancing act. I can't wait to see what happens.
#111
Dude... You have made this car into something absolutely stunning. I checked back up on this thread to get an update on progress and instead got motivation to proceed with my own projects. Thanks, Conrad! Awesome job!
The following users liked this post:
Conrad (Jun 25, 2017)
#118
Better?? How in heck to plan to do that? Surely the GTR engine/etc is heavier than the Evo stuff?
Has it been asked yet: Have you tested the vents in the front fenders? I've been seriously thinking of a way to reduce pressure there. I don't mind cutting up some fenders to do it.
Has it been asked yet: Have you tested the vents in the front fenders? I've been seriously thinking of a way to reduce pressure there. I don't mind cutting up some fenders to do it.
Maybe he is expecting the GTRs inline powertrain to move the vehicle's COG aftward, relative to the 4G63's front-heavy transverse setup. Look at his firewall and trans tunnel modifications, that VG38 is tucked in there. The GTR powertrain may be heavier, but I think his prediction of improved weight balance is plausible. Afterall, a stock Evo is around 60/40 F/R weight bias. It's not too difficult to improve upon that, especially if you posess the fab skills that are evidenced in this build thread. That being said, he has taken a lot of weight out of the rear of the vehicle so it will be a balancing act. I can't wait to see what happens.
The standard Evo engine and drivetrain layout is very front heavy, there is a LOT of weight forward of the front axle line. In this set up that is not the case. The transmission is behind the front axle line as is 2/3 of the engine weight.
When it went on the scales before turbo and intercooler mounting etc the front axle weights were 200Kg (400 lbs) lighter than a conventional evo layout.
#119
Updates, Guys, I am sorry to say it but there has been a massive delay, when the car came from the paintshop it wasnt up to the standard inside or out I was expecting so it went back to the paint shop to be redone inside and out.
The delay to the initial paint completion plus this new delay of a further 5 weeks has set me back along way! :wallbang:
Lost the will at the moment...........:shake:
The delay to the initial paint completion plus this new delay of a further 5 weeks has set me back along way! :wallbang:
Lost the will at the moment...........:shake:
The following 3 users liked this post by Conrad: