Evo X Logging
Just a few notes for USDM users of the code provided by SiC:
In the "Mode23 USA EVOX" and "Mode23 USA RA EVOX" area of EvoScan the formula for throttle positions is "(x-32)*129/255" instead of "x*100/255" Not sure why it is different, and not (yet) sure which one is correct for us to use.
All temperatures provided by SiC are in metric units. For US units use "1.8*x-40" instead of "x-40"
Speed provided by SiC is in kph. For MPH use "1.26*x" instead of "x*2"
Thanks,
Keith
Just a few notes for USDM users of the code provided by SiC:
In the "Mode23 USA EVOX" and "Mode23 USA RA EVOX" area of EvoScan the formula for throttle positions is "(x-32)*129/255" instead of "x*100/255" Not sure why it is different, and not (yet) sure which one is correct for us to use.
All temperatures provided by SiC are in metric units. For US units use "1.8*x-40" instead of "x-40"
Speed provided by SiC is in kph. For MPH use "1.26*x" instead of "x*2"
Thanks,
Keith
In the "Mode23 USA EVOX" and "Mode23 USA RA EVOX" area of EvoScan the formula for throttle positions is "(x-32)*129/255" instead of "x*100/255" Not sure why it is different, and not (yet) sure which one is correct for us to use.
All temperatures provided by SiC are in metric units. For US units use "1.8*x-40" instead of "x-40"
Speed provided by SiC is in kph. For MPH use "1.26*x" instead of "x*2"
Thanks,
Keith
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yes...
53040010:
MAFV:0x808f48:2:x,1023,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087d8:2:x,2,*,100,/:3
526800XX:
MAFV:0x808f50:2:x,1024,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087e0:2:x,2,*,100,/:3
Airflow for 526800xx is untested, let me know
53040010:
MAFV:0x808f48:2:x,1023,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087d8:2:x,2,*,100,/:3
526800XX:
MAFV:0x808f50:2:x,1024,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087e0:2:x,2,*,100,/:3
Airflow for 526800xx is untested, let me know
Last edited by tephra; Nov 10, 2009 at 04:58 PM.
However here comes in my moment of slight knowledge deficit.
Where do I enter this information. Data edit in EVOSCAN?
Thanks!
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
thats the format for my logger.
for evoscan just use notepad to edit the data.xml file
just copy one of the current entries (Load is a good one) and modify the address/name and Eval appropriately
for evoscan just use notepad to edit the data.xml file
just copy one of the current entries (Load is a good one) and modify the address/name and Eval appropriately
Anyone know the request IDs for the 2010 USDM Evo X (55570005) for logging the following parameters:
LTFT- Cruise
LTFT - Idle
STFT
WGDC
WGDC Correction
Thanks a bunch
LTFT- Cruise
LTFT - Idle
STFT
WGDC
WGDC Correction
Thanks a bunch
Last edited by nj1266; Dec 1, 2009 at 01:48 AM.
If I knew the request IDs for logging the parameters then I would not have asked. I would simply copy the code from the 08 xml and change the request IDs to those of the 2010, save, and test the logging on a 2010 car.
Evolved Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 730
Likes: 3
From: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
MUT Table is at 3f244
now when you look at the table in Ecuflash and you know the RequestId from evowiki you can write
logging item in EvoScan.
Example:
0D LTFTMid Fuel Trim Mid (LTFT) % (x-128)/5
Request number is 0D in MUT table so you take value from MUT0x row and D column which is 804575, now you take it and write mode23 EvoScan item as 23804575 using scaling from evowiki
Hope it helps.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yes sorry NJ I should have been more specific.
once you find the MUT_TABLE (as per CT9A) you can then use that as a common reference point for most useful memory addresses
ie MUT0F is ALWAYS the STFT, so in ANY rom if you find the MUT_TABLE then you can find MUT0F easy enough. and therefore you can see the memory address for MUT0F, which will the the STFT
once you find the MUT_TABLE (as per CT9A) you can then use that as a common reference point for most useful memory addresses
ie MUT0F is ALWAYS the STFT, so in ANY rom if you find the MUT_TABLE then you can find MUT0F easy enough. and therefore you can see the memory address for MUT0F, which will the the STFT




