Forced Performance Finally Releases the HTA3794.. 900+whp Capable T3!!!
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Mike
Most 6765 setups make between 650-750whp on average.. this looks like on a pretty mild setup it's making 850whp+ and like Mike said, on kill mode 900-950whp should be attainable.. I've yet to see a 6765 setup make close to that lol.
Evolving Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
I am curious to see a dyno layover of this vs the 67mm precision billet on a similar setup to properly compare them.
Interesting stuff.
Last edited by twkdcd595; Jul 12, 2010 at 03:08 PM.
Yah they made that on much higher boost and a much more aggressive setup. This turbo will outperform the 6765, the only reason theyd even do it is just to show by how much it beats the 6765. Lol this one only made 19hp less.. Throw like 2more psi at it and there you go, youve matched their highest dyno for a 6765.
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Mike
nick,
aaron,
You guys should run a t3 setup instead of the black and go with this turbo. with the silly tuning of ER, you guys might break 1000wheel! just make sure to have a neckbrace handy because I imagine if this thing hits boost at 40 psi, youll get some violent pressure to the neck
aaron,
You guys should run a t3 setup instead of the black and go with this turbo. with the silly tuning of ER, you guys might break 1000wheel! just make sure to have a neckbrace handy because I imagine if this thing hits boost at 40 psi, youll get some violent pressure to the neck
There are ways to get more, compression, fuel, even more aggressive headwork, etc. but I dont see that being practical for most budgets. I wont be tuning Nick's car when its all done and I am not sure I want to change my current setup. We'll see anything is possible.
aaron
I would have to be really silly, unfortunately I dont think that would happen as Mike pointed out. I am 50whp (lets say 5 lbs/min) above what the 3586 is rated (around 75, though 73 is hinted at). The 3794 is being billed as a 90 lb/min. I see 950whp about the limit, regardless of who is tuning it.
There are ways to get more, compression, fuel, even more aggressive headwork, etc. but I dont see that being practical for most budgets. I wont be tuning Nick's car when its all done and I am not sure I want to change my current setup. We'll see anything is possible.
aaron
There are ways to get more, compression, fuel, even more aggressive headwork, etc. but I dont see that being practical for most budgets. I wont be tuning Nick's car when its all done and I am not sure I want to change my current setup. We'll see anything is possible.
aaron
id assume with a 2.4 spool will b e helped significantly. this still would probably be too much for a street car definately. 950wheel is silly as it is. i look forward to many dyno results threads with this turbo. i can't believe 950 wheel is this attainable, with proper setup. turbo must sound great and must feel amazing when it "hits"
Evolving Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Yah they made that on much higher boost and a much more aggressive setup. This turbo will outperform the 6765, the only reason theyd even do it is just to show by how much it beats the 6765. Lol this one only made 19hp less.. Throw like 2more psi at it and there you go, youve matched their highest dyno for a 6765.
Whatever the case of the setup though, your comment was you have yet to see "a 6765 setup" (as in any by the context) make close to that (as in the 901awhp this unit just did and this thread is about). You did not specify any conditions in your post and my post was responding to that incorrect generalization that a 6765 setup has not made make close to that power. Thats how it reads and how I responded. Sorry if it sounds critical of your post.
Last edited by twkdcd595; Jul 13, 2010 at 04:22 PM.
