HTA3794 I would assume 67mm compressor 94mm turbine... I could be wrong tho........

 

Actually its a 67mm Inducer and 94mm Exducer on Compressor..

 

Wow bad *** turbo, thats crazy power. Very nice box

 

A 4294r is a 70mm inducer I believe

 

Thats is correct.. and also a 6blade wheel..

Mike

 

Is this the same setup that you tested the 6765 on?

 

No completely different.. This one is Mivec, small cams, stock intake manifold ported, 2.5 piping not 3", lower compression.. if had this turbo on my kill setup 950 all day..

Mike

 

So how much do you think the smaller cams, mivec, and 2.5" piping helped the hta out spool the 6765? Can you do back to back testing on the same car, HTA3794 vs 6765. Please

 

it has a 3mm smaller inducer... same size exducer. That sounds like they applied the HTA treatment to the 4294R compressor wheel. I don't see how that isn't considered "close"

whatever. It makes hellsapower in a t3 frame. Congrats.

 

Because what it sounds like to me is your saying they use the 4294 wheel and modify it or base it off to "APPLY" HTA treatment which is not the case.. These wheels constructed 100% from the ground up.. I dont consider 3mm CLOSE myself.. 67mm & 67.8mm I consider close..

Mike

 

Inducer on the compressor has less of an effect upon power capability than the exducer.... that's why its not really wise to look at inducer size and base its flow capabilities solely on it. Furthermore why I say... pretty close

The HTA wheels from the past have had 1 or more extra blades than the Honeywell GT compressors. You might think that the MOI is less because its a small inducer, but *sigh* it has an extra blade.... so the theoretical benefit of the HTA wheel having a smaller MOI just isn't so.

HTA treatment = Leave exducer diameter the same. Reduce inducer by 2-3mm, add 1 blade, and cnc that hummer. I'm sure Robert does more than this, but from pictures this seems to be the "trend." Similar idea to BW's extended tip geometry.

When you're talking about 96.7% vs 95.7% reduction in compressor inducer diameter... It seems FP follows the same pattern... might have something to do with the height of the wheel explaining why the inducer of the 3794 was reduced by an extra 1%.

Bah. Who am I to argue with the guys who run 8's...

 

I dont get much involved in the Science and how things are SUPPOSED to work as i am just high school diploma no college regular guy... LOL

Who am I to argue with engineers and smart guys with college degrees.. Im just a guy who buys and tests everything in the real world and runs what i know works on my combinations..

Mike

 

Between you and Aaron I might have about 5% of the knowledge of both you.. Somehow though i sit and dream up combinations that come together and work for us.. You would be surprised how dumb i am.. LOL

Mike

 

Haha! You're doing something right.

* 2003 Black Evo GSR - 8.75@163mph (US Quickest 4g63 Evo )
* World's Quickest Evo 8 Street Car - 8.98@156mph
* World's Quickest / Fastest Stock Ecu - 8.99@163mph
* World's Quickest / Fastest Drag Radial Evo 8/9- 9.05@160mph
* World's Quickest / Fastest Mivec Evo - 8.99@163mph
* World's Quickest Stock Frame FP Black - 9.33@146mph
* World's Quickest / Fastest Stock Turbo Evo - 10.21@133mph ( Most-Wanted )

 

Thanks!!

Minor Details.. We are dedicated.. Most of that comes thru hard work and dedication..