Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

GSC S2 cams on stock bottom end?

Old Jul 17, 2017, 09:35 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schmeevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 32
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Question GSC S2 cams on stock bottom end?

I recently picked up a low mileage evo8 with a Garrett 3582R setup.

The previous owner had made some questionable choices in the order of power upgrades in my opinion...such as the car is on stock cams =[

I see that GSC s2 cams are a good match for the 35R as long as you do valvesprings.

My concern is, will the s2 cams push the car into a power level that will jeopardize the stock rods?

Current power level is 360awhp / 308tq on a mustang dyno with 1.0CF, tuned just a few weeks ago. (This dyno is a heartbreaker but the car is still quick for what it is). Any advice is appreciated.
Old Jul 17, 2017, 11:17 PM
  #2  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
S2's are a fine choice. Proper tuning is what will control the torque to safe levels.
The following users liked this post:
schmeevo (Jul 18, 2017)
Old Jul 18, 2017, 01:14 AM
  #3  
Jp7
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Jp7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 1,637
Received 104 Likes on 79 Posts
I had GSC S2s with my HTA3076R and stock bottom end for a while.

Now I have the same S2s with the same turbo but on a buschur built 2.3.

(I upgraded the engine by choice, not because something failed)
The following users liked this post:
schmeevo (Jul 18, 2017)
Old Jul 18, 2017, 04:09 AM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schmeevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 32
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
S2's are a fine choice. Proper tuning is what will control the torque to safe levels.
I've heard somewhere around 400 tq on the dyno is around the max safe level for stock rods, would you tend to agree?
Old Jul 18, 2017, 12:09 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
meckert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Denton, Tx
Posts: 2,106
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by schmeevo
I've heard somewhere around 400 tq on the dyno is around the max safe level for stock rods, would you tend to agree?
That seems to be a safe tlimit from what I have seen...
Old Jul 18, 2017, 12:45 PM
  #6  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by schmeevo
I've heard somewhere around 400 tq on the dyno is around the max safe level for stock rods, would you tend to agree?
Depends on the dyno, but around there is safe.
Old Jul 18, 2017, 01:30 PM
  #7  
Evolved Member
 
4b11slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Santa Ana
Posts: 1,787
Received 89 Likes on 88 Posts
Gsc s2 with gsc beehives here. Love the cams. Car pulls like raped ape all the way to 8200 rpm. The cams really help the engine come alive past 5,000 rpm.

As for torque and keeping things safe. Thats all in the tune. Controlling either boost or timing advance or both to stay within safe torque levels.

The stage of cam doesnt matter really.
The following users liked this post:
schmeevo (Jul 18, 2017)
Old Jul 19, 2017, 04:48 AM
  #8  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schmeevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 32
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 4b11slayer
Gsc s2 with gsc beehives here. Love the cams. Car pulls like raped ape all the way to 8200 rpm. The cams really help the engine come alive past 5,000 rpm.

As for torque and keeping things safe. Thats all in the tune. Controlling either boost or timing advance or both to stay within safe torque levels.

The stage of cam doesnt matter really.

Thats great, I'm pumped to run these. Why'd you choose 8200 as your rev limit though? I know GSC says you can run these to 9k but I thought 8500 would be a reasonable limit. Should I have any concerns about rod bolts at those rpms?
Old Jul 19, 2017, 05:25 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
 
4b11slayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Santa Ana
Posts: 1,787
Received 89 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by schmeevo
Thats great, I'm pumped to run these. Why'd you choose 8200 as your rev limit though? I know GSC says you can run these to 9k but I thought 8500 would be a reasonable limit. Should I have any concerns about rod bolts at those rpms?

Theres no reason behind my rev limit honestly. Looking over my rom its actually 8306 rpm but when bounced off limiter i thibk it goes to 8500 rpm. I have noticed though that the higher i rev it out. The harder it becomes to catch the next gear. Seems the clutch doesnt slow the rpm down fast enough.
Old Jul 19, 2017, 05:34 AM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schmeevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 32
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by 4b11slayer
Theres no reason behind my rev limit honestly. Looking over my rom its actually 8306 rpm but when bounced off limiter i thibk it goes to 8500 rpm. I have noticed though that the higher i rev it out. The harder it becomes to catch the next gear. Seems the clutch doesnt slow the rpm down fast enough.
Ah I know that feeling already, I'm getting lockout sometimes even from 8k. I definitely have to adjust the clutch point up and see if I can get it right.
Old Jul 19, 2017, 01:15 PM
  #11  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Stock rods/rod bolts should really be kept to an 8k rev limit if you want to keep it together.
Old Jul 19, 2017, 05:19 PM
  #12  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schmeevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 32
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Stock rods/rod bolts should really be kept to an 8k rev limit if you want to keep it together.
Would dropping the oil pan and doing just arp bolts let me push it a bit farther? This set of cams is the last modification I plan on doing before a bottom end build. Cams this off season, bottom end build the following year.
Old Jul 20, 2017, 07:16 AM
  #13  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
I would say those give you extra security at 8k. I still wouldn't push the stock rods.
The following users liked this post:
schmeevo (Jul 20, 2017)
Old Jul 20, 2017, 07:26 AM
  #14  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
schmeevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 32
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
I would say those give you extra security at 8k. I still wouldn't push the stock rods.
Thanks, I'll keep it within the recommended limits. It's not worth the extra few hp/tq to risk the motor.
Old Jul 20, 2017, 07:32 AM
  #15  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,753
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
I like to err on the side of keeping it together, hence why my red was left at "only" 505whp. I'd rather my car be fun and mostly reliable, than go searching for that extra 30-50whp and really raise the risk of having a catastrophic failure. I'll save the kill tune for when the 2.2slr goes in..

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: GSC S2 cams on stock bottom end?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 AM.